TurboGenius Math and the art of describing randomness

Averages are the only things which matter in gambling, everything else is just variance. And even if you were right, it doesn't change the fact that the same pattern can repeat. Turbo seems to be saying it can't, which is clearly false.

 

Perhaps another urban myth or two in the above sentence , One there are no patterns , TWO there are patterns. and people will bet accordingly to what they have read here and what they now start to believe ,then they will tell their friends either concept one or concept two. And thank you for the self perpetuating of another gambling fallacy the promotion of more urban myths.. Love you work.

 

I love this. Great observation.

The mathZombies try to tell everyone that the averages rule everything. Yet I win because of the variance. I love that "everything else." Math has yet to have any powers over it. Hoo Ray for the variance.

 

It's really quite remarkable how hard people will work and the convoluted explanations they will create in order to avoid the blindingly obvious... because they don't want to see it.

I can't say the feeling's mutual.

 

Variance can be friendly in the short run, but many short runs add up, and that's when averages trump variances. Saying you win (in the long run) because of variance is a contradiction in terms.

 

What does your session consist of? Not from spins?
If from the spins, then you cant win session without winning spins?
So where is the difference ?
The same like to session - you can look to any spin and to any amount of spins... And that to win each of these spins which you need, that to win session you must know - which numbers have greater chances, others simply not possible...
If all numbers have the same chances - not possible be the winner simply because of the payment ratio...
And again we return back that for wining we need some physical defect or some physical special knowledge...

 

Pretzel deduction. What mathematical command post did you get control over? It's just axiomatic hog wash. It's like saying the world is flat because it is round.

Anyway, it's no longer an issue because I am demonstrating that my opinion is in fact correct at Roulette Simulator. I take small chunks at a time from the wave formations of the common everyday ups and downs of almost none existent extreme variance. There is only one thing that can get me. It would take a monster sized perfect wave of first selection fails in a swarm to do what you suggest. I just don't let that happen. I can control it because I decide when and how much to bet. I am not controlled by a decision mandated by an imaginary mathematical dictator. I'm not a zombie.

 

Just go to the Roulette Simulator and look at each of my games, each bet placed, and look here and other places where I fully explained Reading Randomness. Actions speak louder than words. You are rapidly becoming an extinct minority.

 

If you cannot formulate in simple words how do you get the advantage - then there is no need for me to watch something. Negative bets cant produce an advantage that is simply logic.
Roulette is the same as target shooting.
To win you have to get more to the centre than to the edges. And that is not only in roulette that is everywhere.
Increasing and decreasing bets - nothing change. You can this way be a winner - some are quite a long time, but that is not solution .
Solution is to learn hit to the center of target

 

BS

You are doing just what I hoped that you would do. Thanks for cooperating. I want you mathZombies to get the message last, once it's way too late. That is all spelled out in my documentation.

 

I would not look at any roulette simulator until hell freezes over .

 

No one cares about your opinion.

 

No matter what is spelt in your documentation, simply are peoples who understand what you do here in forums and are peoples who not understand... That ratio I not will change and I not have such aim. But which is my aim in forums - you seem, for sure not understand...

 

ND, it keeps track of every bet. Every chip value on each number is recorded spin by spin. You can take all the time you want to read each bet I place. It's a fair RNG in my opinion. It plays just like the software that I built for practice as far as kicking out random numbers. You could not get a better demonstration of what I really do. It's far better than my videos. It's proof of my method. Are you afraid to show us your play?

 

Another math zombie has replied .

 

Thanks for your cooperation. See, everyone, these people will not see it until it is shoved down their throats.

 

Great video. For those interested ( everyone else except the spandex boys), the main idea starts from minute 7:18. Replay it over and over again until you get it. The minimum continuous run in 64, 128,256 etc.

 

Giz,

I never played in the make believe mode . Always at the casino live tables .

 

It's not make believe. My reputation is the win. The past 14 years is all summed up. My activity on the forums is all on the line. I play at the live casinos because I'm not sure that any of the online games are rigged or not. Once your reputation and credibility is on the line there is a value in it.

 

You seem to be the only one who would venture to a B & M casino .