Roulette Mathematical Averages

No, you just really suck at math and basic probability.

 

You just described every single one of these systems/method players. Casinos must love these guys.

 

jbs,

I'm guessing that you're not much of a roulette player.

 

Any roulette player is subject to the house edge

No matter what

At the end of the day, King caleb’s chips are at an edge of -5.26%



These math guys can scream and cry allll they want to. Hey, they can even read about the history of the game and learn about basic probability. Guess what. Same edge.

 

No, I don't play unless I have the edge over the casino.

 

The information and exchange of professionalism is astronomical, simply really informative!!!


Thank you guys honestly

 

5.26 % . If you wanna dance you gotta pay the fiddler .Otherwise stay away from the casino and see a Broadway show :
Tickets $ 800.-- for 2 seats .



ND

 

.....well, I can see that nobody here can prove me wrong when I say that G/N (1/4) = a predictable consecutive average miss of 4!....if nobody here can understand that predictable is a beautiful word when dealing with games of chance.....I'm out of here.....adios.....

 

Tis cat was not in a happy mood when he left . LOL .

 

[QUOTE = "juneau, post: 56712, member: 4456"] ... well, I can see that nobody here can prove that I am wrong when I say that G / N (1/4) = a predictable consecutive failure average of 4! ... if nobody here can understand that predictable is a beautiful word when it comes to gambling ..... I'm out of here ..... goodbye ..... [/ QUOTE]
I love the things that you have to decipher on ways to win the rulera, I respect your words and I appreciate it, but I can not understand where you want to go, I do not know if it is because of the bad translation or that I do not understand where You go, but what ahradagra and if you could say it in a more understandable way I would in this to know what you say and get another way to win, as my name says in other forums I am passionate about roulette, thanks and regards

 

Sergio if I were in your shoes I wouldn't care about some random strange post claiming to have yet another system, and would instead focus on getting the software work done for your pigeon loft work.

Stay focused, he was likely just someone screwing around.

 

What is this ?

 

El mal interés lo puso porque entendí una parte de lo que dice y tiene mucho sentido, de lo contrario no lo habría hecho ...
Silencio, las palomas son muy buenas y no creo que nadie haya podido dedicarme las palomas a mí y a otra persona que me dijo que sí, aunque no estoy seguro de tu parte, pero tienes que mantener tu mente muy abierta.
Y lo que joneau dice, tiene mucho sentido, 1/4 tiene 4 fallos, no tiene más, ahora qué pasa con B2. No lo entendí para saber cómo aprovechar al máximo, pero estoy convencido de que Es decir algo realmente genial y lógico.
Saludos y gracias por hacer que mi mente funcione, diga a mis ojos algo tan simple, pero difícil para el Eye Ruletero.

 

What a bad translation ... I'm sorry ...

joneau add me to skype if you can and we speak for the skype translator: sergioisisastrid.
Thank you

 

.....can't anybody on this forum understand basic mathematics: the odds are 1-4....you will average 1 in 4, 2 in 8, 3 in 12, 4 in 16 we are even; now pair that 4th X at the 17th pick on average....prove the math is wrong....

 

But I know what you mean, it is impossible to know the mathematics behind ... I would like you to tell me exactly what you mean, thank you

 

What are YOU talking about..... ?!??!?

is this related to "what you are talking about?"
???

 

What he is trying to say is that 9 numbers sector has 1 in 4 chance to hit, but this is just theory, in reality we should bet against 4/16, 4th hit in 16 results, so when any 9 numbers sector has 3 hits in 15 spins or less then we should bet the other 28 numbers till the 16th spin.
After 16th result restart counting all 9 numbers sectors.
Another way is to have 3 different 9 numbers sectors hit on 3 spins in a row, then we should bet those 3 different 9 numbers sectors for 1 time.
28 numbers against 9, the average makes sense only on GREAT totals, from a few hundreds to a few thousands of results and even then it is not exact.

 

Bet against a 9 numbers sector to become 4 hits from 3 by betting 28 numbers from 13th up to and including 16th spin, 4 times 28 numbers for total net profit 4 times x 8 units = 32 net, or lose 1 time 28 units.

 

Blue and everyone else,

When you test your systems always run a control bet test along side of the system test...where you place a bet on the same amount of numbers using a random guess for the bets.

Good luck.