Roulette More silliness from RouletteGhost & company

Dogshit Denzie has a cool signature >> EC's ? Dozens? Naaaah. BET THE NUMBERS THAT HIT ABOVE AVERAGE! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Forget my old topics. I've moved on. And so should we all do. Don't stay stuck in the same methods that didn't work and never will. <<<

Geez, ya think? Welcome to the party idiot. Like I have said though, be careful, there are *MANY* ways to play "hot" numbers. You CAN play them and still lose. Why? You played them wrong. You have weak rules/standards for your method. Study what works best !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ken

 

lol, so I can say, if you played COLD numbers and lost it's because you played them wrong. There are MANY ways to play "cold" numbers.

In fact, didn't TG show us how to play cold numbers in a recent thread (the hot number system lost)?

 

I'm not talking about "Turbo" and I'm not talking about "cold". Thats YOUR conversation and I have no idea who you are having it with?

I'm talking about playing hot numbers and the fact that there are dozens (hundreds) of ways to play them.

Bob plays hot numbers and Joe plays hot numbers. They both sat down at the exact same time, at the same table. Bob is a winner, Joe is not. How can this be? Play them CORRECTLY (which I know I won't talk about) and you will do VERY VERY well at your local CASINO. Thats a fact, not my opinion.

Argue it, deny it......whatever floats your boat.

Ken

 

Absolutely correct.
You can even add another "VERY" onto that too lol.
It doesn't matter though - they don't get it. That's just how it's supposed to be.
Is Bago still around spouting his mouth ? lol. I keep seeing "show ignored content" - It has to be him making a continuous ass of himself lol

 

Remember what you said about Celtic - that you can see the list of cold numbers, and when you come back later some of them are Hot numbers ? Now imagine the fact that the "anti-system" people can't figure out how to win and it really makes you wonder lol. Maybe roulette isn't for everyone.

 

My personal favorite....lets not forget the loons that privately agree with you but will argue anyways. Dont believe for a second, every member that says hot numbers are BS and they dont play them. Some will/do play them but arguing is so much more fun.

Ken

 

Oh, rest assured - the anti-system people read every word and play what's posted.
Like you said, it's more entertaining to be the opposing force instead of just adding to the progress or giving credit where it's due. You can't help those people. Fortunately, lots of people read and don't post but learn - they know who to ignore and who not to.

 

You guys think I'm nuts for flogging my double dozens bets. But consider this if you will. I accept that many here are now endorsing their own esteem regarding hot and cold numbers and what they know about them. And everyone here has a little different slant on how to exploit them their way too. So consider this also if you will please. You can make up an on-the-fly set of three dozens based on the coldest 12, the middle 12, and the hottest 12. And your expectations on the transitioning of hottest to medium or coldest can be tracked too from cycle to cycle by observing changes from cycle to cycle.

But something that most of you have no clue whatsoever occurs in these cycles anyway, mainly because you haven't bothered to look there. More streaks of sleeping dozens occur in the coldest dozen set than in the other two remaining sets. This is something you can prove to yourself if you want to really argue the point. Sure, they are just random coincidences, but they happen just the same. Now you know why I play the double dozen bets.

That was for you Denzie. I never taught you to use a custom on-the-fly grouping. I needed you to see the concept of sleeping dozens first. So that secret is here and not at the school. Funny where I hide my secrets all over the place. This is the only time and place that I will mention this. BASTA!

 

Has betting double dozens made you wealthy?

If so sign me up

When I started with roulette I was a dog in heat over double dozens

Now I know it's a bad bet

With rare exceptions

You can bet against a rare pattern but the wait could take all day

Grassroots had a nice idea but it just doesn't cut it by itself.

 

The math says that you will win two wins for each loss with the double dozens ( any 24 numbers) . That's not 100% true because of the zeros but it is ruffly the truth for the sake of how the game tends to work out. It is the truth while the zeros sleep, and they do that a lot.

So the trick is to have a game where two wins is enough. If I can win two net wins, three times in a day, then I'm happy. I don't need a gazillion bucks. I'm retired. All I want to do is win room and board for road trips. A paid trip is a gazillion bucks for me. All you need is $5 chips on 24 numbers and six net wins is $180 per day. That's more than enough to explore the Oregon Coast in summer.

Just lay off the deep holes in your game. You don't need to play every spin with the bigger chips. The losses in a row are what kills your progress. Don't have them. Just wait until your guesses are doing real good and then go for it. All of this hot and cold number stuff is just guessing. Just learn how to bet big when you are doing good with your guesses. You have math on your side if two net wins is enough to satisfy you. You don't owe the casino anything for the comps that they give out as morsels of scraps. Play your game and strategy not theirs. If you need more money then use $25 chips but still learn to be satisfied with two net wins. If you can settle for three successful wins at two net wins, per day, then you can beat this game. Most people don't have the self control to do this.

 

What's the difference between a rare pattern and a pattern that you just make up in your head?

Just trying to make you think...

The answer is that they are of course the same.

 

Here is how it works Sknowshit. My brother is a clinical psychologist and academic author and research scientist. When we rarely talk about randomness and statistics he can only see that randomness is some perfect form of chaos. I can let him just pick randomly with my practice software and he dives right into downturns almost immediately. He has no idea how to select from opportunities. Your argument is that nobody can have an intelligent and informed guessing method. That is the world that you need to believe in. It makes you secure and reaffirms your own position of superiority. Only it's the dumb shits way. I like you like this. In fact it's your best face to the crowd. So keep up the home front for wayward boys. Never let down your guard. Because nothing else matters.

 

A great short post at RF >> from member: Drazen..."Hmm.. it is really that simple?"

His response to Dogshit Denzie in regards to playing hot numbers. Well, Drazen is at least 35% there. (lol).

No, its NOT that simple which I have stated dozens of times. Why would you ask a question that King Kenny has already answered? (lol) If I said it, bank on it. There is a correct way and a wrong way in which to play repeats (hot) numbers. If you are relying on members (this includes Almighty Bayes) at RF, you are in deeper shit than you might think.

Ken

 

From Falkor at RF >>
Fact: A repeat of red/black must happen within 3 spins (excluding zeroes)
Example: red appears once; now there is 75% chance that red will repeat within the next 2 spins. Try it and confirm what I am saying is true!

 

They're always excluding those zeros. I wonder why. It completely changes the math once you stop excluding them lol. The zeros HAVE to be incorporated into any method and used exactly like any other number on the table.

 

What he means is, that a repeat of red/black must happen within 3 spins, unless zero shows 4 times in which case a repeat of red/black must happen within 7 spins.

 

Over at RF, I love reading the posts from the "B" team. Its entertaining.

Ken

 

Denzie and RouletteGhost planning out their next roulette scam >>