TurboGenius Moving forward with Turbos work

So there is plenty of threads and posts from the man himself. I've poured over every thread, and every post he has made. I know guys like @Denzie and @Nimo as well as @Mako have "made it". I am happy for them.

Yet there are still many (or at least a handful) that work on this daily spinning our wheels. Now I understand one has to comprehend what turbo has said and I will assume that is MY struggle. I get the horse race, (I hope), I get the law of thirds (I hope). Still don't know where to look on how to get on and off numbers.

I don't plan on giving up. I could use some help, but honestly I am more worried that this work from turbo will vanish into the void of the internet.

So with that said, I will be posting things here that (I hope) are important. Anyone can and should chime in if they are working on turbos work.

 

So... Turbos early threads... Let's start with "roulette random predictable". He is in my opinion talking about law of thirds... Brainstorming a bit here, using law of thirds, a THIRD of the hot numbers should be hoy in the next cycle no? Same with the avg and the sleepers.. Does anyone else here have a thought or two they would like to add?

 

Good old turbo. Same thread as he let it sleep for a month and then posted what I quoted above. But he says we can find the answer...

So. I guess my next post will do what he says. I will run a few with 1's.... Then a few only playing when a number hits twice.... Then 3's... We will see what it shows...

 

This was done on my phone. Moving forward I will use RX. Anyway. One cycle playing a number once it showed.. Balance -44.. Will run some more charts tomorrow.

 

Hi Gary,

The above is certainly true and predictable. I’d like to add that numbers repeating are predictable and at faster than 1/35 needed to win.
I am in the same boat as you and I’m constantly working on this and would hate all this to just sink into internet oblivion.
I can’t for the life of me figure out what it is I’m missing.

 

Hello Gary! Glad to see you! And I'm glad you made this thread, because I probably would have done the same thing next week. Because this topic suggests itself. I'm with you too! I'm glad that the old guys like Gigi and others just showed up. I hope they will join too. In the last few months, I probably wouldn't have been able to test anything extensively due to work, but I'll be taking a break for a few weeks starting next week, and I wanted to devote this time entirely to testing. But together I think it will be more interesting and productive!
I understand that you also want to start from the beginning of his threads or something like that, but in general I would like to decide what exactly we will explore, since although he has one base, as he himself said, but nevertheless There are many different variations of this base for the game. We will still explore the advantages of repeaters, as I understand it?
P.S. And we must be prepared in advance for those guys who will immediately appear, like vultures, who will try to stop any progress of this topic. I think everyone already knows why. And I hope everyone will put in ignore them.

 

Glad to see you guys. In a little bit I'm going to post some charts from RX. According to turbo, waiting for repeaters changes the house edge. In fact, he posted a chart summary that showed the house edge was ZERO. Let's try to get that as well. Charts coming up soon.

 

Also @Platton anyone who tries to derail the thread, I'm placing on ignore. I suggest you do the same. If they want to work with us, sweet. Gigi, nice to see you here! Hope you are well man!!

 

OK, so it seems he is saying if you sit down and play a number that hasn't hit, its 1 in 38... Got it, understood. So he says start at 1x, start at 2x.. Or 3x or 4x lol... Does anyone have a pic of the stats he was trying to show?

 

OK, house edge not zero. However we didn't lose at the house edge either did we? Let's continue..

 

Same thing. 1x numbers and staying on them for 1 cycle. Still not a ZERO house edge.

 

The next chart will be 1x 3 cycles.. Let's see how they look!

 

Well that is interesting ain't it? Just shy of ZERO.. Will run a few more charts to make sure it holds up! Remember this is 1x playing all that show.. Flatbet. 3 cycles.

 

Reread Advantage of Repeaters part 1. It's all there.

 

Will look into that nimo. Thank you!

 

Hello Gary! I wanted to write yesterday, but it was already too late, because I got carried away with re-reading the topic that I quoted from Turbo. Yes, I remember this was one of the first topics. And when I re-read all the Turbo topics for the second time, and this took about 5 days from morning to night, then the second time I decided to immediately write out the necessary quotes and immediately with translation. And then I re-read only these quotes, which I wrote out with translation. But I started writing them out just after this thread, and I kept wanting to go back and look at it, because I remember it concerned Fossell. I appreciate you quoting this particular thread. Although I wanted to sleep for a long time yesterday, but I ended up reading the entire thread, even though it took a couple of hours.

I don’t know how our testing will go in the end, but I want to say that in theory we only need this one thread that you quoted from Turbo. As he wrote in it, that he could not add anything except step-by-step instructions, what he would not do, and the rest was all there.

There’s not enough time to write about your tests yet, but yes, what Nimo wrote about part 1, and what you’re testing trying to figure out how Turbo’s ideas change mathematics, as I understand it, that’s essentially what’s written in the first part . But this is not the most important thing, although of course there should be an understanding, which I only have theoretically, and what this gives in application will need to be clarified. In general, we continue. I think we will succeed. Must go for now.

 

@Platton yup. Most certainly I'm going right back to part 1 and will do my best to work it multiple ways. And yes. Tg did say everything in that thread was all that was needed. Although, he was generous enough to continue with threads of examples for many more years. I have some charts of more 1x 3 cycles.. After that I will move to 2x. In my off time I will be looking at part 1 as well. @Nimo I'm a truck driver so you know we get some downtime waiting for our loads lol.

 

This one didn't get up closer to zero and that's fine. This is collecting data!

 

This one did great lol. Gotta love random!

 

And this one tanked as well. I'm going to move to 2x 3 cycles next and then probably move to turbos next thread.