Roulette My question to Gizmotron and all pattern/trend players

Nothing changed, it's just a different way to play the exact same winning way.
I've detailed how to do this in my posts.

 

Turbo;
Some people would say that your last way does not work (same as all previous)
See my graph of that last "lossing" way

 

Jefra,

It looks like it virtual bets for 20 to 40 spins then goes into a progression that recovers and makes a little on each deep recovery. How is this related to trend and pattern play?

 

Glad to see you posting buddy, may I ask you why are you tracking some past spins in your current strategy whereas the last strategy you presented was playable from spin 1, when you sit at the table.

 

Its always funny to see people play virtually "skipping" spins. It doenst change one iota.

When I got the time ill start a new thread. With all the excel data I calculated in the last few months.

The sad truth is there is no statistical advantage to bet one way or another. Yes even the way turbo bets. After 1000's of spins you get the same data as betting random!

 

For example turbo's flawed math that after 37 spins 12 numbers wont show and after 1 cycle 6 still wont show!

Well stop waisting time and pick 12 random numbers. After 1 cycle of 37 spins, 6 wont show as well!

Ive tested this for 1000's of spins and the data is exactly the same!

 

There is one way of playing for everyone's taste, personally I would prefer playing almost every spins because when the table is busy, if you get 150 spins in 4 hours of play for instance, and you skip/track 50 spins before making a bet, you will barely not play, and the goal is to have fun when you go to the Casino. Of course, but it is a fiction, if it is proven that tracking 50 spins will bring you an advantage over the player who plays every spins in the long run, it would be legitimate to be patient, but of the latter, the proof never came since almost 300 years now.

 

This is' fun isn't it. I'm in the mood to squish, or is that squash, or quash your uppityness. My entire purpose for the Reading Randomness thread is to dispel your notion of reality.

"it doesn't change one iota." Well, I can't convince you by producing the math that has not been invented yet. Perhaps you will show everyone how that will be done. More likely not. But this is how you will be dragged through the mud for going along with conventional thinking and pretending to amuse yourself. I have people in this world that are learning the skill.

You know for a fact that all Roulette spins, and other forms of randomness are independent events and that past events can't effect future outcomes. You know this is reality. Only that is about to be changed and your beliefs can't stop it from being validated. I do know this much though. If, by coincidence alone, I avoid paying or funding a losing streak then I won't dig a huge hole to recover from. I know that you believe I can't know when I'm in a losing streak. This is not my first rodeo. Well you just keep believing that. I'm going to make such a big noise that even you will hear it one day. Meanwhile why don't you dazzle us all with your excel-data thread somewhere new. Make sure it is at this gambling forum somewhere so that you can't redact it after I make you my boy. People are going to look back at the entire forum and not just my work being done on this topic. References to a flat earth might come to mind.

Yes, this is fun.

P.S. A virtual bet is a bet selection that is not funded. It is not sitting out bets or spins.

 

This is my version of the Escalator HolyGrail System:



Don't be impressed because I used 25$ chip on the due numbers.

 

Ooohhhh boy secret math... I stopped reading after that...

 

The hidden math buddy

http://web.archive.org/web/20071230041728/http://windontlose.com/

 

50.000 to learn hidden math... for 4,99 extra you get the special glasses and pencil. Eraser not included!

 

Good, now own that. Stop reading troll.

It's not secret math. That's just your warped mind trying to castigate me. You actually didn't say anything. Math that has not been peer reviewed and validated yet is just theoretical math. Evidence of an unexplained phenomenon is not yet explained data. You pounce on something smarmy with delight and think that you are the only one with brains. That makes you a common run of the mill dickhead. You do have a three digit IQ, right?

I love people that side step the issue with sophistry, erect a straw man, and then declare their superiority over obtaining victory over the straw man that they erected in the first place. It's like watching you jack off in public. You are an idiot. But you are in fact entertaining. Try this. It's the real issue, your name, "Ka2." Maybe it should be KaKa2, or just Ka Ka for shit, (caca)

 

Hidden Math by A Wendell ? ROFL

 

Keep jacking off dickhead.

Where is your Excel Data thread, Fred?

 

Since KaKa2, that's #2 from the down-there side, brought up the fallacy of virtual bets, and thinks they are spins that are sat out, then how many individual players would it take to validate that his reality is in error?

If 10 people learn my free teaching here at this forum and demonstrate that they can beat the mathematical expectation while also demonstrating that they used virtual bets effectively, then would that be enough to at least demand further discovery and a possible mathematical explanation for the results? Since beating the expectation would be considered a kind of heresy against mathematical teaching, would it not be prerequisite to assume that this would be a kind of unknown math? It would be a yet discovered math that would remain to be undiscovered wouldn't it?

That is how to talk caca.

 

Gizzie you sound frustrated... all I hear is badmouthing... no real facts, show me your data. And ill give you the same data in return but then randomly picked...

 

Why don't you just pick your butt like a monkey. I'm not bad mouthing you. This is a compliment.

 

Ka2 there are like a few posting members here that if you do not side with them and fall into their gang, you will be talked down to and made fun of. No matter if you have lots of talent, info or data, it is that classic thing, their way or no way.

oh also lots of secret this or that and i cannot say because of being ID'd type of defense LOL. Understand?

 

Are you an ex drug dealer or casino dealer?.