Baccarat Neural Strategy

I already did explain it. Go find it since that is all you ever do around here "hey hey." You don't actually do anything constructive. I gave away Reading Randomness for free. It became completely open discussion. I was convinced that I could give away a working method to beat the casinos for free by a suggestion by Jono. All it takes is learning a skill. It's hard. You must use your brains. You must learn it and practice it. I gave all that away including practice software that I developed for free use. It's all there to prove to yourself that you are good enough to use it at a casino. You want a "Holy Grail?" Well here it is. That was my penitence. I apologized for losing the money. I said no to the $50,000 because I knew I was not ready. I even went as far as dealing with people that keep demanding an explanation like you. So that is all you are going to get for now. BTW, you never dealt with my question to you. You just changed the subject. So what do you think?

 

Yes, it looks like gibberish to me as well. It's looking way back to a point that I don't remember the context of the methods. It requires reading the entire thread all over again. I'll do that if you want. It's a stepped progression I think. It has very little to do with reading Randomness. But it is also a thing where I was searching for the best times to use RR to pick the best times for placing bets. I also used a stop win method I think.

 

You misinterpret my post, Gtz. Quite the contrary, I do appreciate reading most of your posts on various threads. I never intended to attack you, only to comment I could not make head's or tails of a specific post pertaining to The Neural System. You apply to Roulette, However Baccarat is also applicable.

As to my knowledge of online Casino cheating, I am referring to a now decease friend who worked as a comptroller at an Indian Casino. He told me the Casino had an aftermarket chip that could be placed in a table game machine (Roulette, Baccarat, Craps, Blackjack.) that would profile the player's wagering style and adjust the outcome in the house favor as necessary. He was a very good friend and I trusted him completely. If this chip is available, it would apply to any table game that was not live play at B&M Casinos. Thus, any internet Casino is suspect. You, being a programmer, should be aware of this technology. With this knowledge, it is a dealbreaker using any table gaming machine.

On this Neural Strategy thread, you seem to have made a lot of progress and then stopped further mention. Did you lose interest or just stopped posting? I would appreciate any further knowledge you acquired along these lines. Your posting along these lines dates back to 2019. After that date, almost all mention of the Neural System cease. Was the system ever disproved?
rb
.

 

Yep. I can go on about trying to contain context and end up getting further into the weeds in the process.

 

I'm 100% knowledgeable about computer based targeting at these unregulated casinos. I can write cheating software with no problems. Stitching video together is easy. How could you possibly know? I've seen a ball come to rest in a slot as a winner and then all of a sudden when they jump back to a wider view it's a loser in another slot. They don't even care anymore. If nobody does anything about this they will just keep on cheating. It's B&M or forget it.

 

I don't really care much about it. If a thing works then you attack it and make money. If it does not work for a while then you leave that behind and switch to anything else that is working. It's so simple. You expand your awareness of things that can work. You increase your skills. I personally believe that there are imaginations, like magical thinking, that go through phases of it working and also go through phases of it not working. If you can target that then you can make money off of these changes. That's why I stopped criticizing other people's methods of things that tend to look like they work at times. You don't have to use trends or patterns. I just use them because I have trained myself to see them. With them I can see when the phases are working and when they are not working. In other words I can see the win streaks and the losing streaks with them. Others can see the win streaks with their methods. It's so simple.

 

Giz, you typed a bunch but really said little. However, it was a great stab at statesmanship dialog. It would rival the late great master statesman of all time, Adali Stevenson. To quote the master statesman, "Some of my friends are for it and some of my friends are against it. Me, I am for my friends."

What I ask was your opinion of The Neural Strategy? Worth looking at or a waste of time? Same question for Jimske if he will answer.
rb

 

Railbird, I started out with my own magical thinking period. I had no idea what makes winning and losing work. Politicians, or even ambassadors, are nearly never accused for being short on words and saying nothing. I have been put on the defensive more times than not for my opinions since 2006. That mostly by people making assumptions of claims by me that were never made. So I'm almost always making it clear that I don't stand for magical powers that I never claim to have. I find it odd that the "Neural Strategy" gang never needs to defend their capabilities but the people that use trends to identify phases of things working do. This by math oriented statistical players that always jump on the notion that trends don't predict the future. So, given more mumbo jumbo, yes, Neural Strategy is worth looking at. There was one guy here in the past year that is, was, all for it. He was all about premonition and claimed the powers.

 

So to give this thread a real chance and to answer Railbird properly I found the original PDF file and have reached page 21 of the more than 100 pages in the document. I plan to read the entire book from that document. I just read this from page 21: "The optimum results were attained when bets were increased moderately after
losses within an identified pattern."

I would say that 'The Neural Strategy' is worth reading. At least so far it is.

 

The results ( page 23; The Neural Strategy ) tend to go along the same results found in the Reading Randomness thread where practitioners started finding a 4.6 to 1 win to loss ratio that equated to a two to one advantage in the end result. This is what they wrote in the PDF book:

"The ability to recognize and exploit patterns gives us a powerful edge in
attempting to beat these casino games. Does this mean that the laws of probability have
been repealed? Of course not. What has occurred is that we have identified a situation
wherein certain patterns, once they begin, are slightly more likely to continue for a
limited number of decisions than pure randomness would indicate."

 

Here it is in a nutshell:

 

I find this funny. The author refers to conditions that are "less than random."

Every strange or wild condition is part of the nature of randomness. There is no "less than random," there is just randomness.

 

Even a string of p p p p p d d d d d is random. You don’t see it consistently so you can’t capitalize on it as such. Every pattern can be considered random, you are correct giz.

 

It was never my intention to put you on the defensive Giz. I apologize for any undeserved pressure I may have placed on you. I was under the impression you had made much more progress than page 23. Consequently, you are presently not deep enough into The Neural Strategy to form any kind of opinion one way or another. If this is something you don't have the time or interest, I understand. I certainly don't expect you to do all the work and I do nothing. I am researching myself with pen and paper manually, as I am not that computer-literate. Furthermore, I'm not saying this Strategy will work or not, but maybe with patience, discipline along with good record keeping it may work. Regardless, I would appreciate any thoughts you may form as time passes. Furthermore, I would appreciate anyone else opinion on this subject.
rb

 

I disagree with the weights.

 

What weights are you talking about?
rb

 

Actually, I'm about to place all my attention into doing what Proofreader has been doing for ages. He is running tests in front of everyone. I'm going to run my own tests of the Reading Randomness software. It has a graph function for the EC version. The older double-dozen version, I can do screen shots of the charts that include results telemetry. So I can do EC's or Double Dozens and just see what happens. It will get boring but I need to do this. I'm just going to start posting these at the end of the Reading Randomness thread.

 

Giz

can you post a link to that thread when you start? Thanks buddy!

 

Here is the very beginning of that discussion:

https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

Here is the approximate link location where that page that I started running those practice sessions begins:

https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/page-139

 

Putting more emphasis on certain outcomes.