Roulette Proof of Turbo's Fallacy

Y ain't that in the signature ..

 

It's not me, ... or just me that can do that well. It's other people. This is about them anyway, because they are doing it without tutoring. I wrote the thread to be self taught. It's an experiment to see if they can read it and teach themselves. So far a few can. And there are not that many complaints so far. So I don't mention how it is going. In fact this comment back to you will soon go unread and unfound. That's fine with me. Nobody will know why it's not in the signature pretty soon, or soon enough.

 

LaLaLaLaLa

 

yep! LaLa land is where Reading Randomness comes from. That belief is the only thing protecting the use of it. The dr. anyany serves a perfect purpose here. He's recruiting suckers to do his leg work and the mathZombies are telling sailors that they are going to sail off the edge of the world. That's fine with me.

I don't care who does this or who doesn't. It's on the record. It might get plagiarized or even sold as a winning system by somebody in the future. A mathematician might steal it and grab fame. But just about everyone in the gambling world will recognize it.

 

Ever heard of Cyrus Reed Teed? Well Reading Randomness is my Cyrus Teed period or I have been right all along. That's OK with me too.

I'm referring to his "Hollow Earth" theory.

 

Oh, how deep is with you...not far talks about Shambala I think......

 

Meanwhile, someone listened to what I said.
Good for you Merv. As Steve would say "Go make millions".

 

Turbo,
I have a question for you. What determines the probability of a number winning?
1. Is it the number of pockets on the wheel in which a number can fall?
2. The distribution of how the numbers have hit over the last several spins?
3. Both 1 and 2?

 

This is great, more people get smarter. Such people fully deserve it.

There are many ways, each person's choice depends on his/her risk tolerance and how much real time practical "work". And all these "ways" are easy once you get it.

I play the simplest "way" with minimal drawdown.

 

READ! Dont take my word for it. Spin out data out of excel for 37 numbers, take 14 or so numbers that are “behind” use them with your own spins from the casino.

compare the results what do you see???

 

@TurboGenius , @Luckyfella , and @Raf , also others, as you might know, I have a thread here.

I'm doing statistical tests and researches and leaving side notes behind. I'd be very thankful if you shoot some ideas for new tests in there. I am trying to demonstrate the limits of what we call chaotic randomness. You seem to be exploiting the same idea. Any input would be appreciated.

 

I have one for you as well.
Are numbers expected to appear 1 in 37 on a non bias wheel producing random outcomes ?
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Both 1 and 2?

 

@TurboGenius

You are funny as hell lmao

 

No LaLaLaLaLa is rather than addressing the things talking straight, you're casting some already repeated context.
You're turning into a modern Democrat ? Their virus getting to you?

 

Can compare my eyes being in someones else body .. doesn't match, doesn't fit.

 

@gizmotron

"My edge is a large enough number of people doing this and producing loss to win results that are demonstrably beyond the possibility of inaccuracy."