Baccarat Proof that Jae's OG System is Validated

Giz chill facts are facts do not be like me ((()))))

 

Ok Jae has stable back we need Nathen Detroit in here to be REF or REE the guy only states fact and the real deal, AS RAV WOULD SAY (WAITING)

 

not in the hands of a trained and skillful RR context.

The only way to test RR is to play and record practice sessions and get a consensus of aggregate results.

 

I’m not a saint, but yes... I am sitting on a higher perch than you.

Fortunately, I’m a person who can typically acknowledge my downfalls and continually try to do better. Fortunately, I have no mental-illnesses that prevent me from seeing my own pitfalls. And while I too may be an asshole for taking my stabs at you, I’ve carefully chosen my battles. I’ve despised you from the moment that you made what I consider a shady business venture with a fellow board member and also what I consider to be a con of more than $5,000 to gamble away without any real blowback. I’ve witnessed you treat this dealing with the saltiest approach.

But I honestly don’t hate you. I think you’ve had an over stimulating life, and a good run and a bad run with life’s cards. You have faced adversity and fir the most part dealt with it, but you have not overcome it.

Your a self-absorbed cynical piece of shit living in a trailer off a small social security benefit trying hard to be relevant or to find something to give your life and legacy more meaning.

I want to believe that you can do better and I genuinely hope you will do better. But that’s only on you if you ever decide to make changes fir the better.

 

Just let me have a day or so when I feel like searching the code and hunting down the problem. We can save the rest for the debating society.

 

Nathan Detroit is equal parts troll and retard. The only thing he should be reffing is a farting contest where his nose is the judging decider.

 

Yes, I can see that. It's the award podium for fuckheads.

 

It's You're a self...

You wouldn't by chance be from New York City?

 

I'm keeping the ultimate reality experience a secret. It does not pay to share pearls with swine.

But that doesn't mean we can't have fun down here in the mud.

 

gotta go for now. I have an algorithm calling.

 

Jae can you please tell me why you said Nathen Detroit is what you said he is

 

Troll yes, retard no. He's really a Roulette player who seldom plays Baccarat. He's the Yoda Troll of the forum. He's like elevator music. There is nothing really to bother to even to turn off.

 

A better question would be, why do you think that he only speaks facts and is the real deal. Here’s his very own quote on your thread from awhile back.

Maybe the reason you tend to like him is that you overlook the real him. I believe he has complimented your style and play afterwards, which in my opinion is insincere and very troll like.

He often likes comments from scammers and people making absurd comments which leads me to believe he is a troll and encouraging stupid shit, or genuinely likes these comments and contradicting himself because he’s also quite possibly mentally retarded. I give him the benefit of the doubt by stating he is equal parts, although realistically he could be a higher percentage of retard.

Trolls often make baseless accusations in forums to invoke a response that gets them off. On this thread he made several comments directed towards me that aren’t true. Claiming I don’t have a team, that I’ve gone in ruin, that my girlfriend left me, etc. utter nonsense, just a troll fishing for shit. Trolls tend to try and bait people that they view as stupid for their own entertainment. Perhaps, he thought I was a good mark, but then again, he probably thinks you’re a good one as well.

 

I know how to use words and compound words in their proper context. You are correct, you caught me red handed. I’d blame it on my autocorrect on my phone, or the fact that I’m responding to a lot of stuff and typing fast, but I won’t make excuses. I own that. Good looking out.

 

I was just kidding. I make typos every day.

I'm still not finding what's wrong. It must be adding it up and keeping it from past sessions.

 

I'll try to go at this from the bottom up.

Do these Vig amounts look reasonable for 100 sessions? Each (line / number) is a session's vig.

Code:

130
425
390
150
450
60
45
275
315
150
195
105
195
130
225
45
360
175
100
90
120
175
150
425
220
90
75
315
175
110
280
100
495
340
45
165
125
315
390
360
180
280
390
585
225
150
280
340
25
325
225
75
315
210
70
125
245
440
75
360
75
270
495
180
225
340
210
225
220
175
270
110
180
455
180
255
300
180
375
90
175
105
45
260
30
70
220
325
270
125
--------------
19835

 

What is a session in your criteria? If you mean a series of recovering from -20 as a session, then I suppose I couldn’t argue with those numbers.

 

LOL, yes. His one liners and short quips are a constancy in the universe. Sometime it just drives me crazy. He's playing the roll of Nathan Detroit from the movie "Guys and Dolls."

 

Yes, a series. It means that the application starts over going after -20 with virtual bets on its way to a trigger at -20.

So these numbers are taken from a single series. I will post a result of a single series and show that Vig is only taken during real bets.

 

Here is a winning series: The vig for each bet accumulates for each hand after real bets start. In other words after the -20 trigger is reached.

Code:

1 hands, Virtual bets total = -100 -- Player @ 100 bet
2 hands, Virtual bets total = 100 -- Banker @ 100 bet
3 hands, Virtual bets total = 0 -- Player @ 100 bet
4 hands, Virtual bets total = 100 -- Banker @ 100 bet
5 hands, Virtual bets total = 100 -- Banker @ 100 bet
6 hands, Virtual bets total = 100 -- Banker @ 100 bet
7 hands, Virtual bets total = 100 -- Banker @ 100 bet
8 hands, Virtual bets total = 0 -- Player @ 100 bet
9 hands, Virtual bets total = -100 -- Player @ 100 bet
10 hands, Virtual bets total = -200 -- Player @ 100 bet
11 hands, Virtual bets total = -300 -- Player @ 100 bet
12 hands, Virtual bets total = -400 -- Player @ 100 bet
13 hands, Virtual bets total = -500 -- Player @ 100 bet
14 hands, Virtual bets total = -600 -- Player @ 100 bet
15 hands, Virtual bets total = -700 -- Player @ 100 bet
16 hands, Virtual bets total = -600 -- Banker @ 100 bet
17 hands, Virtual bets total = -500 -- Banker @ 200 bet
18 hands, Virtual bets total = -800 -- Player @ 300 bet
19 hands, Virtual bets total = -1100 -- Player @ 300 bet
20 hands, Virtual bets total = -900 -- Banker @ 300 bet
21 hands, Virtual bets total = -600 -- Banker @ 400 bet
22 hands, Virtual bets total = -1100 -- Player @ 500 bet
23 hands, Virtual bets total = -1600 -- Player @ 500 bet
24 hands, Virtual bets total = -1200 -- Banker @ 500 bet
25 hands, Virtual bets total = -1800 -- Player @ 600 bet
26 hands, Virtual bets total = -2000 -- Player @ 200 bet
27 hands, Real bets total = 200 -- Vig so far = 10 -- Banker @ 200 bet
28 hands, Real bets total = 500 -- Vig so far = 25 -- Banker @ 300 bet
29 hands, Real bets total = 900 -- Vig so far = 45 -- Banker @ 400 bet
30 hands, Real bets total = 400 -- Vig so far = 45 -- Player @ 500 bet
31 hands, Real bets total = 900 -- Vig so far = 70 -- Banker @ 500 bet
32 hands, Real bets total = 300 -- Vig so far = 70 -- Player @ 600 bet
33 hands, Real bets total = 900 -- Vig so far = 100 -- Banker @ 600 bet
34 hands, Real bets total = 200 -- Vig so far = 100 -- Player @ 700 bet
35 hands, Real bets total = 900 -- Vig so far = 135 -- Banker @ 700 bet
36 hands, Real bets total = 1700 -- Vig so far = 175 -- Banker @ 800 bet
37 hands, Real bets total = 800 -- Vig so far = 175 -- Player @ 900 bet
38 hands, Real bets total = 1700 -- Vig so far = 220 -- Banker @ 900 bet
39 hands, Real bets total = 2700 -- Vig so far = 270 -- Banker @ 1000 bet

This looks like it adds up the Vig correctly. It also adds up the bets correctly.