Roulette Scams Questions for Ion Saliu (saliu .com gambling system seller)

Ion Saliu (Parpaluck), Please forgive my late response (years). You've written extensive material misleading people about me. There's a lot to add in time. For now, I'll focus on particular parts.

For reference, your last post regarding me is here. I understand you're a "competitor" (technically), selling various gambling systems and software. The history between us is:

1. Around 10 or so years ago, I read your claims that you have the "holy grail" of gambling. I offered you I think $100k if you could prove it (which you didn't), then I'd purchase it. It's an offer I've made to many others who claimed to have the HG. You declined. I forgot you existed.

2. Some time later, I was informed by someone you wrote claims that I "pirated your software". Your claims were on your website. It was nonsense, and our approaches are incredibly different. Your approach is a particularly clumsy attempt at "dealer signature". I contacted you to explain your mistake. You didn't respond, or amend your false claims about me. So I published a copy of my email to you (for others to see), and let the matter rest.​

To this point, it must be like 10 years ago. I ignored you. You continued to attack me though (and you're still going).

I have no interest in "competitors". I mind my business, and they mind theirs. I do have interest in refuting false claims about me.

Before I make you a new one, I have two questions:


Question 1: You state below you're "the most truthful Homo sapiens who ever was". Let's test that. If I irrefutably prove your various claims to be false, will you issue a public apology for your mistakes? Just YES or NO will do.




Question 2: Exactly what experience do you have with advantage play in roulette, and specifically roulette computers?
For example, do you know what scatter and a dominant diamond is? Have you ever tested any roulette computer? Don't be vague. Please, give precise details of your related experience.

Again there's more to come, but it's important to focus.

 

Krookooyak:

Holy smokes! A criminal must be also a thicko to round up the picture!

You did contact me via email way back, after your release from prison. In fact, your email begged me for my software. You claimed it was for a good cause: “in the name of science”! You sent me the link to your “scientific cause”: a fake laboratory. You published on that “site of insane science” all kinds of caricatures!

On that site, I also found a link to another “mad site” of yours: “genuine winner”. And that’s where I found out more clearly that you pirated my roulette system based on the wheel halves. I was hearing a guy with a strong Down-Under-English accent explaining a roulette system that I had created while the sheeply-speaker was in jail! What was even more outrageous, you, the ex-convict, was asking for a steep price for a system that was available for free from the true author of the strategy. That is, from the saliu .com website!

I was also led to a newspaper story that read like a veritable crime novel:

• https://forums.saliu .com/pirates-haters-jealous-attackers.html
• Pirates, Haters, Jealous Attackers; also Stefano Hourmouzis

Search for Stefano on the long page.

What “roulette computers”, skum of two screaming bitches and three krazed dawgs — one without an eye, one without an ear, one without a tail? “Roulette computers” belong in the same realm of insanity as UFOs or “end of times”.

I read that Edward Thorpe built a quasi-mobile computer designed to “clock the roulette wheel”. It ended up as a joke, although the effort was commendable.

Not even NASA can build such a precise instrument (not to mention that it must be extremely small and lightweight as to be used in a casino, at a crowded roulette table. But what can such a “tool” measure? The acceleration or the deceleration? Would a single rotation of the wheel be sufficient? The dealer howler “no more bets” in a couple of seconds!

Not to mention that the casinos could enforce “no more bets” before spinning the wheel! But they love the suckers (one is born every minute!), so the casinos keep alive the “clocking the wheel” bait!

As I wrote in my previous posts, the “roulette computers” are best represented by insane crooks. A notable case is your bud (or one of your alter egos?) once known as Mark Anthony Howe. He was advertising his “roulette computer” by showing a plastic toy of a “Fisher personal computer” of the 1980s! Insane is insane is insane!

I repeat the saying that best applies to Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano”:

• “Once a criminal, always a criminal.”


Ion Saliu,
Founder of Roulette Mathematics
Founder of Theory of Streaks
Founder of Mathematical Axiomaticism

 

Parpaluck,

Which of your systems will provide the player with an edge?

 

Parpaluck,

I'm going to assume that you're relatively new to roulette. Not only do ballistic computers exist, but they've been around for a very long time. APs have been effectively predicting where the ball will land without a computer for a very very long time as well.


https://www.canadiancasinos.ca/tech...o-outplay-casino-de-charlevoix-and-bag-ca50k/

 

Ion Saliu (Parpaluck), I asked you these:

You didn't answer, indicating you aren't interested in the truth or correcting your mistakes.

You didn't answer this either. Presumably because you have no related experience.

---------------

Your response is as expected. It appears I didn't need to rip you a new one. You did it yourself.

• You don't care you've misled people.
• You're unwilling to correct yourself
• You have no experience with roulette computers or roulette advantage play

Everyone makes mistakes. But only people with integrity are willing to correct them. It's not about truth for you. Your intent is purely to discredit me.

As such, I'll provide further information. Then people can make their own conclusions about you.

 

Below I've responded to your other post:

Yes, they should. The problem with anonymous cowards is they're anonymous cowards.

IHeartRoulette:

• Has never dealt with me,
• Doesn't even have basic knowledge of advantage play,
• Is not at all interested in the truth or correcting themselves.

And clearly, they put a lot of time and effort into attacking me. They're not the good Samaritan they claim to be. They're someone with a stronger motive. Like a "competitor", or someone with a vendetta.

I wonder why that might be. We'll get to that later.

Yes, some people are downright stupid.

Are you referring to my bizarre claims that roulette spins are often predictable with the application of basic physics, and that it has been done for some time?

Or is it my explanations that when game outcomes are random, no system can work because your "win rate" is the same as random bets. Therefore, the only way to beat roulette is by "increasing the accuracy of predictions", which can be done by exploiting the mechanism that determines the winning number (the wheel), rather than nonsense like "streaks"? Is this what you find difficult to believe?

No, I wasn't. You're probably referring to the forfeiture of my PC. None of it is relevant to my roulette computers. You know this. You don't care. But I'll educate you.

The prosecution wanted to "seize" my PC purely for the media (newspapers & TV). It was a publicity thing. Everyone in the case knew it was just for publicity. I agreed to the request and did not contest it. And before I handed it over, I already had a different computer. Everyone knew this would be the case, but even prosecution said in our meeting it was just for "show".

Now that's amusing.

No you aren't.

No, you aren't. And "streaks" are fallacy.

Apparently you're the founder of everything.

 

Ion, now I'll address your false claims that I "pirated" your system.

From your page explaining your Hemis system (which you falsely claim I copied from you):

Deflectors don't "wear out". Maybe you're referring to dominant diamonds. They are caused by a combination of wheel tilt and ball track deformations.

And you're referring to the distance in pockets from one winning number to the next. At this point, you're looking at a method related to"dealer signature".

Short-term "imbalance" is nothing to rave about. In 20 spins, you can have 18 reds and 2 blacks. It's meaningless.

What you observed to this point is neither "dealer signature" or "wheel malfunctioning". It is normal statistical deviation, and "fallacy" like streaks.

I didn't even know of your "Hemis" software's existence, until you accused me of "pirating" it. All I knew of you is you claimed to have the HG despite your theories being a muddled mess, as I already explained. It's not the first time someone claimed to have the HG.

Nothing was "pirated". Simply you saw my video demonstrating something basic, I mentioned "wheel halves", and you made ridiculous assumptions without investigating. Your "Hemis" system appears to be a clumsy approach to dealer signature, with no effectiveness.

Frankly, your whole website is a mess. It's hard to navigate, you frequently contradict yourself, and your understanding of roulette is abysmal.

Show everyone here this logo. I would never put that in a logo because:

1. This is not what my system does. I only ever mentioned wheel halves for the sake of simplicity when tracking profit/loss in one of my videos. I already explained this in my email to you (and I'll give more detail further down).

2. It would be a stupid "logo phrase"​

It appears your software uses command line, without a GUI (interface). I don't think I have ever used any "command line" program for roulette, at any time. They are clumsy and tedious to use. It's like comparing Linux command line to Windows operating systems with regard to user-friendliness.

Have you seen my Hybrid roulette computer software? Perhaps you should, so you understand your DOS programs are quite different to what my company develops.

Initially players needed to send me spins for analysis, and I'd respond with betting charts. This was to protect my intellectual property. Current versions use an interface on either PC, MAC, iPhone or Android to connect to a remote server. The end-user's software is freely available. It doesn't matter if it's copied. The server-side software is what does the analysis. And even if the server were hacked, hackers would find it nearly impossible to decrypt the software without the decryption dongle.

I have various businesses. Licensing my roulette technology is not my primary source of income. Due to time constraints, I ceased taking new players a few times. At one point, I licensed the relevant company to 3 players who took control for 12 months. I just didn't have time. The company continued without me. However, they haven't had time to continue either. So most recently, my company is being sold. I'll put you in touch with the broker if you'd like. The asking price is AUD$1.7M. But it does not include source codes, and probably not my forums.

None of that has anything to do with you, your "Hemis" nonsense, or suggestions that your rants scared me.

That'd be because your approach is nonsense.

The fact you didn't have a practical solution for "counting distance between pockets" reveals how far behind you were (are).

Discovering a circle can be divided into halves, then that halves can be divided into quarters, is not a groundbreaking revelation.




Now I'll explain an important point. In my email to you, I explained WHY betting so many numbers isn't a good idea. I'll elaborate below. The chart's X-axis is "jump value", and Y-axis is "number of occurrences". Peaks are groupings of high bars.

Say we had a "peak" at about +15 pockets. Our "maximum edge" is the very center of the peak. But if we bet just one number, we can have many "near wins". So "edge" isn't everything. More important is "profit per hour". This is why we bet neighbors too.

The green area is typically where we'd bet. We would NOT cover too many numbers, because then we'd be betting in areas with a negative edge (the red areas).



So should we bet HALF the wheel? Actually the amount of numbers we bet depends on which areas are profitable to bet.

If your peak is narrow, your edge is only on the narrow peak (perhaps 5 numbers maximum).

If you peak is quite broad, your edge is on perhaps 15 or so numbers.

If your peak is very broad, it might be 24 numbers.

Furthermore, sometimes the peaks are in separate areas - you can have multiple peaks, in different areas.

You cannot say "bet on half the wheel" without potentially diluting your edge. In layman's terms, it is like blindly betting in the "red" area. You must bet only in the "green" area.

Again your website is messy and difficult to understand. But from what I gather, your Hemis system is:

1. Track whether the ball moved IN or OUT of the previous half.
2. Track STREAKS of the INs and OUTs, as explained below:

So initially, your Hemis approach appears to be a clumsy attempt at dealer signature. But at least you're kind of on the right track (or so it seems).

Then secondly, you obliterate any chance of the system working by tracking "streaks" with typically gambler's fallacy. It's fallacy because your notion of streaks is typical random behavior. What happens after your "streaks" is random. That means your "streak tracking bet selection" has not change your odds, at all. So you may as well just bet randomly.

Here's a summary of your sample results

So you're assuming normal statistical deviation is a legitimate "bias" of some kind (although "bias" actually means something completely different), and that you have some kind of edge.

To make it worse, you say this:

So you haven't even given consideration to dealers. You're attempting to apply an approach similar to "dealer signature", without consideration to dealers, and/or distance traveled by the rotor and ball.

Excluding 0, the chances of one half of the other spinning next is 50%. It's the same as red/black (without 0). What you've done is precisely the same as tracking streaks of reds/blacks, then considering any imbalance of reds/blacks to be an "exploitable anomaly". It isn't. It's text-book fallacy.

Now I have a headache from reading your website. It's a mess. Your explanations are poor. And nobody uses .html websites anymore. Please upgrade to a PHP CMS like Wordpress.



Now I'll explain why in my video I used "19 pockets":

The system I demonstrated used ballistic principles. To determine if a spin was a win or loss, I aligned the predicted number with the diamond nearest to me. And the diamonds 90 degrees to the left, and 90 degrees to the right, served as "markers" so it was plainly easy to see if the ball was in the right area.

The image below illustrates this:



As I already explained, betting so many numbers often actually dilutes your edge. The optimal amount of numbers bet depends on the width of the peak in the bar chart (as in my earlier example).


To sum it up, your Hemis system is garbage. It is a mess of classic gambler's fallacy, with an incredibly clumsy look at what happens on the wheel. This is the first time I have ever fully read your page about Roulette Hemis. And now I agree - it's not dealer signature. You are just tracking streaks of events that have 50% probability. It's exactly like tracking streaks of red/black.

Ion, you're 70 in March. Perhaps it's time to grow up. Or perhaps time to get a different hobby. Anyone who understands basics of gambling and roulette, with the fortitude to read your messy website, sees your knowledge is exceptionally poor.

You have no experience in advantage play, or roulette computers. You have attacked me unjustly, and don't have the integrity to correct your mistakes.

While I could waste more time pulling apart your website full of fallacies, I don't have time. It doesn't mean I'm finished with you.

 

Ion Saliu, Now I'll address points from your other post:

As Caleb already highlighted:

It's quite easy to verify roulette computers are legitimately effective. The above link is one news story, where a player won a large amount in a few days. There are others, involving much larger amounts.

You claiming not even NASA could do it indicates again your knowledge is abysmal. Here's more for you:

A UK lab conducted their own study:
roulettephysics.com/nwml.pdf
(copy and paste link)

For many wheels, you don't even need a computer. You can often use visual ballistics. There are also other approaches that work, enabling you to bet before ball release (in the right conditions).

Almost every wheel has dominant diamonds (diamonds the ball hits more frequently than others). So we know WHERE the ball will fall, an inordinate amount of times. Getting an edge is as simple as knowing which number is under the dominant diamond WHEN the ball falls, then using analysis to find how far the ball usually bounces. And it's really not hard, because rotor and ball deceleration rates/curves are predictable.

This is at least a simplification of the physics involved.

"Millimeters per second"? I assume you mean a slight timing difference will mean a completely different outcome. And if that's what you mean, it's not true.

A visual ballistics player's estimations of rotor and ball speed are somewhat clumsy and inaccurate (compared to a roulette computer). They don't need precision timing for an "edge" anyway. That's because they already know WHERE the ball will "mostly" fall. They just need to determine approximately WHEN the ball will fall, and this involves basically determining how many revolutions the ball has remaining before it falls.

This is an over-simplification of the physics involved. But essentially it's not hard to beat many wheels without the precision timings of a computer. It is well-documented fact, only you are uneducated on the matter.

More deranged than your "fallacy claims" that "streaks" are the "holy grail"? I'm no fan of Mark Howe, but even his knowledge is well beyond yours.

Again, you're clueless. Their computer's algorithms worked well. The only problem they had is the hardware broke down. Keep in mind this was in the early 1960s. They didn't have anywhere near the hardware of today. Take smartphones, for example. They made about $10,000, which was a lot back then. Enough to buy a house.

Fast forward to more recent times, and you'll find news stories like these:

The Ritz Players (1.3M Pounds in 3 days)
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2004/mar/23/sciencenews.crime
(although some speculate they only used visual ballistics instead of a roulette computer)

Australian man wins $50,000 (CAD) in 4 days:
https://www.canadiancasinos.ca/tech...to-outplay-casino-de-charlevoix-and-bag-ca50k

$200,000+ won by Laszlo Kovacs in Australian Casino
https://web.archive.org/web/2005031...s.com.au/story/0,10117,12534638-38200,00.html
https://www.engadget.com/2005/03/19/wired-shoe-helps-gambler-cheat-at-roulette/

These are just what you hear about. Just the players that get caught. 1.3M pounds in 3 days is getting a bit greedy - it's no surprise they were noticed. $200,000 in a few months is more like it, but he made mistakes that got him noticed.

How many others are there, which you don't hear about? You've got no idea what my teams do.

I could go on, but it if you're after a UK Goverment-commissioned study into roulette computers, see this:
roulettephysics.com/nwml.pdf
(copy and paste link)

This was with only a basic roulette computer provided by a casino consultant. It did not adjust for ball deceleration rate changes. Literally it is something that can be coded in a day. It is about the equivalent of my Lite version roulette computer. And I make a version like this available so anyone can test for free, on any wheel they want. This is one way anyone can do proper research for themselves, instead of believing people like you.

I've provided ample proof here for anyone to know the likely truth. I could provide much more. Certainly you wont correct your mistakes. And if you truly believe your claims, perhaps it's time for aged care.

I expect you'll respond with more dribble. Steve scammer this and that blah blah. Because your intent is only to discredit me, for personal reasons. You have no interest in the truth. You want to sell your book and software.

Ion, I don't care what you do with your Hemis system and streak HG nonsense. Go make money with your system. Sell to whoever you want. I want nothing to do with you. It took me years to bother pulling apart your bullshit.

 

Kokodrilo “Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone”:

I.
Actually, you are “old” to roulette — ruminating in that rocking chair of the gambling-disabled. You widely claim all gambling systems are part of the “gambling fallacy” — so you have no sane reason to gamble!

Only a suicidal psychopath would do something to harm himself gravely. (People do commit suicide caused by losses from gambling.) Since I do not consider you a suicidal psychopath, it is reasonable to conclude you the one out of contact with roulette. You are certain gambling means losing; therefore you have stayed far from roulette your entire (adult) life.

I repeat: “Roulette computers” belong in the same realm of insanity as UFOs. You talking about HALLUCINATIONS. You’ve never seen a “roulette computer” ‘cuz they do NOT exist. The two cults are about of the same age.

Show me, to the rest of us, other than the criminal sickos like Stefano, a real photo of a real roulette computer. Other than Howe’s plastic toy, there is none. They show also an old pic of Thorpe’s first attempt to create a “roulette computer”. It looks like a backpack — go inside a computer and “clock” the roulette wheel speed with that! What a joke!

I’m sure, you, and other afflicts of “roulette computers”, are also avid believers in UFOs — watch again and again those “extraterrestrial” shows on the History channel.

II.
As for your link, it simply is casino self-promotion. They self-describe: “The premium casino venue…”

And they show caricatures promoted as “photos” — a male model pictured in handcuffs. Very much like photos on UFO conspiracy “venues”! Not to mention that the “premium” guys absurdly claimed the “roulette clock” was on a mobile phone. That’s ridiculous!

“The ball passed 0! Press a button of smartassphone. Connect instantly with another smartassphone. Calculate — in a fraction of a second — the speed (accel or decel). Generate instantly the number to play. By then, ‘no more bets’ was issued… actually, the ball had already stopped! “

I’ve been very near roulette tables hundreds of times (I played a couple dozen times, when I was allowed). See:
• https://saliu .com/winning.html
• Fearing Losses, the Casinos Bar, Ban Winning Gamblers, Skilled Gambling Players.

I’ve never seen a “roulette computer” — ever! You haven’t either, mainly because you hardly played roulette. Again, show us a good photo that speaks louder than 1000 words. There is none. The casinos know there is none. That’s why keep the “clock-the-wheel” bait alive.

Otherwise, the casinos would make a very easy change: “No more bets before the spinning starts”. Just a couple of seconds’ differential! But them kasinos want the bait alive as many gambling afflicts would give up roulette altogether. Most of them afflicts do have more money than the average gambler. Allowing the “no more bets” delay of very few seconds, the casinos insure some guaranteed money from roulette — otherwise not a popular game anymore.

III.
My roulette systems are well described on my website. The first mathematical roulette strategy has been widely imitated but never duplicated. It is based on theory of streaks. Only the streaks are founded on mathematical formulas. Anything else in roulette systems is founded mostly on some static parameters — red/black, odd/eve/low/high.

Some roulette systems add the frequency parameter. But they “sin” by advising the “sleepers” — unfortunately, they can skip easily 200 consecutive spins.

Playing more frequent numbers is a better mathematical roulette strategy. The skips are also a form of streaks. A good roulette strategy based on skips is presented here:
• https://forums.saliu .com/apache-roulette-systems.html
• Roulette Gambling Systems Based on Number Skips.

The easiest and most straight-forward roulette system relies on reading the marquee.
• https://download.saliu .com/roulette-systems.html
• Roulette Systems, Strategies: Wheel Bias, Marquee.

This system offers a winning chance of over 51% for any roulette player. There ain’t no 100%, pal! 100% certainty is the UFO that devours your days and nights!

Of course, there is also that roulette system of mine pirated by the notorious criminal Stefano Hourmosusis. It is the major point of this thread started by the criminal himself. The system divides the wheel into two hemispheres based on the previously drawn number. Every roulette wheel is biased.

Bias is the attribute of The_Everything, the Universe, that is. Everything is random. One essential attribute of randomness is repetition: Some elements repeat (even several times), while other elements do not appear at all. This fundamental factor creates bias.

I first noticed bias in the year of grace 2000. I wrote the spins at a roulette table in the Trump’s Taj Mahal casino (!) The bias was very strong in favor of the outer hemisphere (80% to 20%):
• https://saliu .com/bbs/messages/156.html
• Casino Test of Super Roulette Strategy, Halves System: Trump Taj Mahal.

I analyzed a longer run — also based on the real-life spins you saw on the marquee system page (about 8000 spins recorded at Hamburg, Germany, casino). In this case, the inside (inner) half was biased by almost 5%.

This roulette strategy is very, very hard to implement in a casino. They made it impossible now. You need to use quickly the charts I created for identifying the inner/outer hemispheres. You are not allowed to use those charts on the premises. Besides, it requires extreme quickness — the time to bet will expire before you make a decision.

So, show us your UFO… er, “roulette computer”! Pull it from your pocket! Better still, pull your head out of that barrel of whiskey!

 

Krookooyak:

Holy smokes! A criminal must be also a thicko and a pathological liar to round up his image!

Again, the saying that best applies to Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano”:

• “Once a criminal, always a criminal.”

I.
The pathological liar Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” knew about me first. I did not know him, I hadn’t heard of him, before he contacted me. He started by showing me, in his email, his praise for my work on one of his sites.

Based on that praise, Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” asked me for the favor of gifting him with my gambling systems, my software, even the source code of my software. He self-proclaimed it was “in the name of science”.

Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” wanted to be clean in using my roulette systems based on wheel halves. He received my system and dedicated software from Chip (Frank Accardi) — another criminal (for different offenses).

In his praising email, Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” also sent me links to his “dedicated-to-science” websites. One was named some energy-research “laboratory”. It was a joke showing all kinds of caricatures.

I realized this guy was a scammer beyond reasonable doubt. I had the “chance” to deal with other crooks and insane cuckoos — but not on the Stefano scale!

I followed another link sent by this insane criminal in his praising-yours-truly email. The “genuine winner?” site was dedicated to roulette. It only presented one roulette system. It was my system based on wheel hemispheres. He only called them halves. "We consider which HALF of the wheel the ball landed in." (He lately changed the story to various amounts of roulette numbers in order to avoid resemblance of piracy — after I and others exposed it.)

I realized immediately I was dealing the worst pirate of the “third kind”. (I use this term from a UFO movies that added fuel to the UFO affliction, very similar to the affliction to the cult of “roulette computer”.)

I did some Internet research and I found out more — a lot more and disturbing — about Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano”. A CRIMINAL, A CONVICTED FRAUDSTER IN STOCK TRADING!

II.
“Roulette computers”


I repeat: “Roulette computers” belong in the same realm of insanity as UFOs. You talking about HALLUCINATIONS. Nobody, I mean a SANE PERSON, has ever seen a “roulette computer” ‘cuz they do NOT exist. The two cults are about of the same age.

Anyone show me, to the rest of us, other than the criminal sickos like Stefano, a real photo of a real roulette computer? Other than mad Howe’s plastic toy, there is none. No SANE PERSON could ever show us a credible “roulette computer”.

Well, there is an old pic of Thorpe’s first attempt to create a “roulette computer”. It looks like a backpack — go inside a computer and “clock” the roulette wheel speed with that monster! What a joke!

Links to sites truly analyzing “roulette computer” fall into two categories:

A. Casino self-promotion – them kasinos want the bait alive as many gambling afflicts would give up roulette altogether. Most of them afflicts do have more money than the average gambler. Allowing the “no more bets” delay of very few seconds, the casinos insure some guaranteed money from roulette afflicts — otherwise not a popular game anymore.

B. Links from mad gambling scammers represented by the crook of the crooks, Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano”. His ring owns at least 25 websites, including forums. They used to fight fiercely — or so it seemed. ‘Cuz now they are in the same bedlam. They pretend fights, but they advertise for one another.

Perhaps it is a “global” scheme to lure afflicted gamblers to very expensive gambling systems. The casinos are also beneficiaries as the criminal ring creates more gambling afflicts, therefore more surefire losers. I won’t be surprised if casinos wouldn’t be financial participants (sponsors) in this “Stefano” scam.

The so-called “UK Goverment-commissioned study into roulette computers, roulettephysics.com” is a lie that should be prosecuted. Is the “creation” of the madman Anthony Howe. He was the first to advertise it. Now, the criminal Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” is the owner of the site, or owned by his criminal ring. The UK government has nothing to do with the fraudulent scam.

But, then, again, the saying that best applies to Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” and his scam-ring:

• “Once a criminal, always a criminal.”

Ion Saliu
Founder of Roulette Mathematics
Founder of Theory of Streaks
Founder of Mathematical Axiomaticism
“A good man is an axiomatic man; an axiomatic man is a happy man. Be axiomatic!”

 

Krookooyak:

Holy smokes! A criminal must be also a thicko and a pathological liar to round up his image!

Again, the saying that best applies to Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano”:

• “Once a criminal, always a criminal.”

I.
The pathological liar Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” knew about me first. I did not know him, I hadn’t heard of him, before he contacted me. He started by showing me, in his email, his praise for my work on one of his sites.

Based on that praise, Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” asked me for the favor of gifting him with my gambling systems, my software, even the source code of my software. He self-proclaimed his request was “in the name of science”.

Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” wanted to be clean in using my roulette system based on wheel halves. He received my system and dedicated software from Chip (Frank Accardi) — another criminal (for different offenses).

In his praising email, Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” also sent me links to his “dedicated-to-science” websites. One was named some energy-research “laboratory”. It was a joke showing all kinds of caricatures.

I realized this guy was a scammer beyond reasonable doubt. I had the “chance” to deal with other crooks and insane cuckoos — but not on the Stefano scale! Crime-prone, insane, thick, and pathological liar!

I followed another link sent by this insane criminal in his praising-yours-truly email. The “genuine winner?” site was dedicated to roulette. It only presented one roulette system. It was my system based on wheel hemispheres. He only called them halves. "We consider which HALF of the wheel the ball landed in." (He lately changed the story to various amounts of roulette numbers in order to avoid resemblance of piracy — after I and others exposed it.)

I realized immediately I was dealing the worst pirate of the “third kind”. (I use this term from a UFO movie that added fuel to the UFO affliction, very similar to the affliction to the cult of “roulette computer”.)

I did some Internet research and I found out more — a lot more and very disturbing — about Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano”. A CRIMINAL, A CONVICTED FRAUDSTER IN STOCK TRADING!

II.
“Roulette computers”

I repeat: “Roulette computers” belong in the same realm of insanity as UFOs. You talking about HALLUCINATIONS. Nobody, I mean a SANE PERSON, has ever seen a “roulette computer” ‘cuz they do NOT exist. The two cults are about of the same age.

Anyone, other than the criminal sickos like Stefano, show me, to the rest of us, a real photo of a real roulette computer? Other than mad Howe’s plastic toy, there is none. No SANE PERSON could ever show us a credible “roulette computer”.

Well, there is an old pic of Thorpe’s first attempt to create a “roulette computer”. It looks like a backpack — try go inside a casino and “clock” the roulette wheel speed with that monster! What a joke!

Links to sites truly analyzing “roulette computer” fall into two categories:

A. Casino self-promotion – them kasinos want the bait stay alive, otherwise many gambling afflicts would give up roulette altogether. Most of them afflicts do have more money than the average gambler. Allowing the “no more bets” delay of very few seconds, the casinos insure some guaranteed money from roulette afflicts — otherwise not a popular game anymore.

B. Those are links from mad gambling scammers represented by the crook of the crooks, Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano”. His ring owns at least 25 websites, including forums. They used to fight one another fiercely — or so it seemed. ‘Cuz now they are in the same bedlam. They pretend fights, but they advertise for one another.

Perhaps it is a “global” scheme to lure afflicted gamblers to very expensive gambling systems. The casinos are also beneficiaries, as the criminal ring creates more gambling afflicts, therefore more surefire losers. I won’t be surprised if casinos wouldn’t be financial participants (sponsors) in this “Stefano” scam.

The so-called “UK Goverment-commissioned study into roulette computers, roulettephysics.com” is a lie that should be prosecuted.It is the “creation” of the madman Anthony Howe. He was the first to advertise it. Now, the criminal Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” is the owner of the site, or owned by his criminal ring. The UK government has nothing to do with the fraudulent scam.

But, then, again, the saying that best applies to Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” and his scam-ring:

• “Once a criminal, always a criminal.”

Ion Saliu
Founder of Roulette Mathematics
Founder of Theory of Streaks
Founder of Mathematical Axiomaticism
“A good man is an axiomatic man; an axiomatic man is a happy man. Be axiomatic!”

 

Sorry for the duplication! I only wanted to edit my first post. Admin, please delete my first post.


Ion Saliu
Founder of Roulette Mathematics
Founder of Theory of Streaks
Founder of Mathematical Axiomaticism
“A good man is an axiomatic man; an axiomatic man is a happy man. Be axiomatic!”

 

Parpaluck,

I visited your website.

It's very tough to read because of the background pattern that's used behind the font.
My suggestion: Less is more, get rid of the background so that it's easier to read.

 

Ion, by any chance do you believe Earth is flat?

And do you think humans are probably the only intelligent life in the universe?

I'm not sure what to say about this.

You think the UK government, the NWML (lab), casinos, and various newspapers and TV stations are in a conspiracy. And the conspiracy is fooling people into believing roulette computers exist and work?

Ion, if I put you in touch with the government lab I referenced, and they verify the lab test is true and accurate, what then? Would it mean it just validates your theory it's all a conspiracy, and roulette computers don't even exist?

 

Somenoe who believes in flat earth must have been rocked too close from the dome when he was a baby...

 

• roulettephysics.com is a blatant scam site even to every normal person on earth who first accesses its home page. No government in the world would accept endorsing a known ex-convict. Your lie about the endorsement of the UK government in your scheme should be prosecuted.

And where is one photo, just one, of a “roulette computer”? There is only the image advertised by madman Mark Anthony Howe, your alter ego. It was the photo of a plastic toy dubbed “Fisher personal computer for kids” of the 1980s.

• Where is your UFO, flat-earth insane stupidiot???

These are signs of severe INSANITY! Forget about directing law enforcement to this deranged ex-convict. Methinks the authorities have already been notified and they have already investigated the insane crook. There was another legal case against this insane Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” after his first conviction in stock-trading fraud.

Methinks the law enforcement realized he is only insane and he could always plea “not guilty for the reason of insanity”. They might have decided that Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” is no longer a danger to society. They concluded that no normal person, not even another insane person, would be so foolish to pay Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” for his scams. Everybody can “smell” his stinky scams!

Maybe Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” is no longer a danger to society. But how about a danger to himself? Persons showing such grotesque hallucinations certainly fill the profile of a suicidal psychopath.

Ion Saliu
Founder of Roulette Mathematics
Founder of Theory of Streaks
Founder of Mathematical Axiomaticism
“A good man is an axiomatic man; an axiomatic man is a happy man. Be axiomatic!”

 

I'm still anxious to see your UFO... er, "roulette computer". Why don't you pull it out of your pocket? Better still, pull your head out of that barrel of whiskey! It might make you think that your eyeglasses are a ballistic roulette computer...

 

I never said they endorsed anyone. I said they tested the viability of roulette computers, albeit a simplistic one. Again, I'll gladly give the researcher's contact details if you like.

You're right. Report me. Tell them I fabricated this report, and that their testing was a hallucination. Here:

UK Government Lab Report:
roulettephysics.com/nwml.pdf
(copy and paste link)

There are quite a few. Start with the simple one in the government lab report.

Right.

I was thinking the same thing about you.

 

Holy smokes! You are drowned in the deepest sea of INSANITY!

The “UK Weights and Measures Lab (government lab)” is another of your SCAMS! You fabricated that “UK government lab” as your “Energy Nat Lab” you fabricated for Australia!!! That’s why they do not arrest you: YOU ARE TOO INSANE!

The “UK Weights and Measures Lab (government lab)” even has two “roulette systems” –

“Both our roulette system (roulettephysics.com) and computers (roulette-computers.com) use these principles.”

These British government employees! Look how they spell: “Both our roulette system”!!! They does know British English, doesn’t them?

Maybe we should alert the national health agencies of Australia and UK. Some said they put madman Mark Anthony Howe in a mental institution years ago. Perhaps that’s where Steven Hourmouzis “Stefano” posts from…