Roulette R-Sim - Giz2 - Reading Randomness Validation

I completely understand your "need" to attack me and be on the offensive. That's fine.
Everything in my posts is factual, so attack away if it makes you feel any better.

You have 25 numbers covered here, do you see it ?
25 numbers is what percent of the table ? 67.5%

Since we're here and your attacking me - and you do this in the casino.....
Define your chip values ?

FOR THIS SINGLE BET ALONE -
You're going to need 44 $1.00 chips
You're also going to need 17 chips at $5.00 each.

Now tell me that you're going to place 61 chips on the table of two different values before "no more bets" is called.
Don't do this.
You can attack me all day, that's fine. Don't think people are ignorant as to how to play at a table.
You just required 61 chips for 1 SPIN
Do you buy in with $100.00 after every spin ?

Just stop, you're making yourself look bad.
Instead of attacking, just understand that people see right through this. People that have actually played
in a casino.
And yes, now you have the option to delete your account and stomp away saying
"I tried to demonstrate it but TG ruined it so I lost on purpose !!!"
Be a man for God's sake.

 

No, I get to say that you are full of it. That's what everyone has been saying for years about you anyway. You can't get 26 individual stacks down in time from many different selected sets, hour after hour. I can go for ten hours using 12 to 16 different sets ranging from 22 to 26 numbers and get all the bets down in time. I have real qualified brain capacity. You can't even imagine it.

 

That's projecting. see a doctor. PKB

 

Great. So now you are advertising another one of your whacky contraptions.

 

David Gregory, Don't feed the troll.

 

Of course you can('t)
But on a simulator with no pressure and no time limits and no issues with placing chips.... you can't do more than 10 sessions at a measly 14 spins average over 5 whole days...... You are afraid that it will lose (which it clearly will) and then you'll attack more I suppose with stories of how you did it on purpose.

You're digging yourself into the hole, I'm not playing anymore because frankly it's sad at this point.
Good luck and keep winning.

 

Bull shit Turbosmartass. I want to win the session and leave. I bring enough bankroll to do just that. If I have to fight my way back during a difficult session then I'm there longer. Where in the hell do you come up with this BS?

 

100% bullshit. But it does read impressive. If I recall, I'm not supposed to win every session. Your axioms are not right. They are just more of that crap you believe is real truth.

 

It's total crap. I don't get to keep recovering from a downturn and succeeding in a won session because of one of Turbo's rules about the number of bets it takes to recover and win. I have to win more than the bets placed or it does not count. You actually have a few people here suckered into thinking that makes sense. You are not a real player.

 

Look at the value of the extra bets. I hedged the bets. You valuation does not account for this. I placed the big bets on 16 numbers and the smaller bets on the rest. The doubled up bets were reverse hedging to make a few of the bigger bets better if they hit. And I worked too. You have lost what ever credit I had given you in the past year. You are clearly the king of the crash test dummies when it comes to whacky contraptions.

 

I'm just disagreeing with you and showing others here your faults and obvious misconceptions.

 

Been doing it for decades. And I have the brain power to make snap decisions and switch bets after each spin. It takes real smarts and fast hands. It also takes taking the only two seats that best feature this capacity. So I have you down now as slow in that regard too. Thanks for being such a genius.

 

I can show people what you don't know thanks to your own big mouth. No wonder you are a system player.

 

I can buy in with just $400 and paly all day including many many $100 to $150 bets and still keep going. I know when to attack and I know when to lay back with throe out bets. You don't.

 

It's just you projecting again. Get help.

 

God? That would be you, right?

All I'm going to do is stomp you. I'll just keep on winning sessions, showing all my impossible to place bets to anyone that wants to see it, and I could care less what an uninformed crash test dummy like you of a system player thinks.

 

You and your crystal ball will be smoking. I'm starting to get a sense for envy. The motre you predict that I need to attack you the more you look like you hope that it will happen. All I have done is show that your axiomatic rule is BS. That suggestion that I must win more than the value of the bets placed for instance. I'm not attacking you. I'm saying that your rule is bullshit.

 

You are playing more, and on and on. These comments of yours don't go away. All I have to do is keep winning. Then you can get your mom to drive you home.

 

There is enough here to show that Turbo has no idea what a real player can do at a busy table. Tells you something. His ad hominem comments did not change anything. He just showed off what a good salesman he is. He sees disagreement as a personal attack. Get some help. I don't need you projecting and your assumptions.

 

We are here to make money. So the longer Giz's winning streak continues and stays above 50% showing some edge in RR, the more the reputation of TG and other mathboyz will disappear. Works of course in vice versa.

This is going to be fun -> popcorn