Roulette R-Sim - Giz2 - Reading Randomness Validation

David,

it's so pity y'r 1000,000 usd bank-account, is only worth 890 K.

the difference has been floated away, like the Mississippi river, only it's called Inflation.

Very wise to go from 25$ to 5$ minimum bet...lol

 

With all those wise words and floating away this seemed appropriate:

 

EC flat betting as its best: +25 ticks, -7 tick max drawdown.

https://roulette-simulator.info/en/game/390fd7a8c59bd975aec988d3a7427687

 

Seems you had a typo, there I’ve fixed it. Cheers lol.

 

At first when I saw this, I was very impressed, but after close examination, I am not impressed at all. I noticed that before this particular game there was 1,308 resets. That means 1,308 lost games were deleted before getting lucky enough to post this one. Give me a break.

 

I saw that too. Here is how it works. I launched Giz2 at R-Sim and I won't reset it. What you see is what I will get. It's like Yosemite rock climbing. You go up there and you do what you do. Now you make it up, rappel off, or you eat shit. I didn't die in Yosemite. I won't die if I fuck this up. Gads. Get a pair.

 

Sure one shot doesn't prove the system is valid, but still that kind of result is a good example of the very good run.

 

It's nonsense. Those 1,308 losing sessions delete whatever this one shows and then some.
That's why that person hasn't played using that account since forever because it will just fail and they'll lose that position that some people find impressive because they don't know any better.

 

Then actually play on it. Is 1 run a week with 14 spins too much ?
Since you should already know it fails then you're just delaying that event on purpose to avoid what comes next. You already said you just lose on purpose (lol) to bait others. A man would just admit the failure, learn from it and try again using what they've learned.
(Or they charge "students" to teach them how to fail).

 

But it still is a good example of the good run.

 

It's meaningless if it can't be reproduced.
It might be the definition of luck.

If I could hit a coin with a bullet 300 meters away would you think I was a marksman if I missed 1300 times before and could never do it again ?

 

This is proof that you mother dressed you until you were 15. BTW, I'm breaking your law of baloney using hedged bets. Now use that razer sharp mind of yours to see what I mean.

 

Sigh. Guess I'll just wait for the excuses. You've had plenty of time to come up with one.

 

dry up

 

You're making conclusions based on what YOU can or cannot do. There is a lot of things happening ouside of your box.

But thank you very much for your opinions.

 

Look, the cat started with a 3,000.00 bankroll and his first bet was 1/3 of that, 1.000.00. Pure crazyness. That was an example of getting extremely lucky, not a good example of a strategy of any kind. However, I did notice his bet placement was almost identical to mine; except he always missed the chops.

 

I could make 10 million dollars given 1,308 chances. Actually, my grandchildren could do that also.

 

If that $3k was really the system's total bankroll then you're absolutely right about that bet, but could be a part of bigger picture. From the point of total end result it wasn't so much.

Anyway I will care more about the "ticks". In this kind of system with this "much" of information the size is a bit meaningless thing.

Btw. My curve looks very similar too but I don't use so tight stops.

 

Excuse me for being naive, I do not know what 'ticks' mean. Also, what do you mean by you don't use so tight stops?
Why don't you play some rated games also so we can view your actual strategy curves? Thanks

 

stops = how long do you take losses by the same bet structure until you change it or stop betting.
tick = a tick up/down on your bankroll

I don't disclose my systems. Too much hard work to give for free. And I don't do OPM

OPM = Other People's Money (I m just fine with I already have and I am doing)