Roulette Ramblings of the Inept for the Misfits

#13 is a runner

 

The Hare ?

 

Just 1 runner and betting the Hare

 

Got to like the Hare

 

Well that's enough for me

 

Thank you for the clarification about the use of 1-5-25. Although I never liked it untill I have strong BR.
Thats a steep drawdown you had there but even nicer comeback

 

*light bulb*
That system could be considered what happens between Turbos Repeater system.

Same principle, different hunt?

 

A. Now do the same test with 4 random numbers see if there is a difference...

B. You are using a NEGATIVE progression, turbo only spoke about POSITIVE progression so only add units when you are winning.

C. And where the hell are all the REPEATERS turbo was talking about?????????????? Where are the 14 repeats in one session????? This was all about them now suddenly all this has changed in betting the last number in a set...

So how is this going to show the REPEATERS, because according to turbo that was THE ONLY WAY to win...............

 

Actually Turbo in this thrad never said anything about repeaters as numbers.
That was another thread on another forum (which recently I finished reading btw).

He also said a few pages ago that the logic is the same about hotness not in numbers but in "hot sectors" in that case.

I'll give that though: The negative progression I also think is wrong.
But it's the only way when an expected hot number (from a hot sector) is becoming colder than the payouyt.

 

If that dude turbo took out his penis most of you would get down and suck it but that's just my opinion.

 

Exactly. Why doesn't he understand this ?
Hot numbers repeat. A hot set of numbers show before the rest. This is common sense
but he's somehow seeing it as two different things.

I'm not sure how many ways I can explain, or how many analogies I can use to get across to some people.
*Bago likes that post
So clearly that's two people that don't understand a word I'm saying and I can't make it any more clear.

Picking numbers randomly to use for the sets ? That's what you want ???
That is EXACTLY what you are supposed to be doing if you read what I wrote.
Why are you asking people to do something that you think proves you right -
yet it is exactly what I said to do.
I'm confused.

 

We understand perfectly that's why we spot the contradiction. A number is a number, whatever it belongs to a hot sector, a hot random set, a hot street, a hot dozen, it is still a COLD number, and your theory until now is it is a BAD IDEA to bet on a cold number because there is a risk it will sleep for a very long time (we lose nothing betting on a number that never shows, remember?).

And as Joe said on RF.cc, and I already told you this, several people with the same random sets arriving at the table at different moment, will obviously do not get the same remaining number into the "hot set", so different people with the same system will bet on different numbers and all can't have their different numbers hitting before the expectation.
That's why systems based on past spins are worth sh**.

 

13 repeats in 37 spins; you only had to count.
Also on Roulette forum; a member shows repeats are usually 16 for 40 spins. These 103 spins yesterday had 16 repeats in 1st 40 spins.
No mountain KA2

 

EXACTLY Hot number repeat, that was the way to win! A hot set of numbers has NOTHING to do with repeats, it has only ONE number remaining. IF for example one set with the numbers 1 2 3 4 5 6 and there are

14 repeats on the number 1
1 hit on 2
1 hit on 3
1 hit on 4
1 hit on 5

the set in it self does not increase correct??? we are suddenly waiting for number 6. Number 6 could be a long time sleeper, correct? How did we take advantage on 14 repeats on 1??? We did not we used it 1 time.

If you would have READ my posts, that EXACTLY what I did in my test, using random numbers for the sets, and I showed you, that it did not make any difference, we still lost. Yes a lot of sets will finish early but some will finish LATE and thats where you lose! And on average you get 1:37

 

I can count. 13 repeats indeed, and how many did you "catch"??? If i calculate correctly from the above picture you got 5 right???

 

I'd say R-sim is playing fair. Our runner wins on spin 36. One more spin for the mathboys; plenty of repeats.

 

So of alllll those repeats, you got 1 and you got it on spin nr 36. So that's almost 1:37 where is the magic? Do this test 1000 times more and it will be 1:37

 

But did i bet it for 36 spins

 

My bad it came on spin 36 and you have bet it for 16 spins if I'm correct, still It might take longer again do it 1000 more times and will be 1:37