Misc Reading Randomness the Course, or the Book.

I was thinking of writing a book because many have complained that the Reading Randomness thread is way too nebulous and strewn with distractions. That book would be available in print & eBook format. It would likely cost between $9.99 and $39.99. Then there are the teaching websites. I have a great one and could put it there in steps of learning as a course. So I'm wondering if people would risk a few bucks for a book or a teaching website with clear enough steps of learning that they would become skilled at my technique?

This is being done because I'm fed up with taking any crap from the mathZombies and want to dish it out , once and for all. I will take any student from no knowledge at all to understanding how this shows that Reading Randomness utilizes "Variable Change" as an advantage.

 

Your own personal forum might be a better choice




ND

 

I have already reserved that for whenever a book or the online course is all out there.

This is my dilemma. I have to pay at least $360 per year to host the online course. I can pay that easily. But I expect to completely wreck Baccarat, Blackjack, Craps, and Roulette. I expect the world to go viral over this. My online course will take people from no experience to beating the casinos. I expect all of those that do the work to reach at least the 2 to 1 win to loss ratio and for that throng of people to validate RR as an example of variable change. This will put the mathZombies on their backs. That's going to happen. $30 per month is a small price for me to get what I want. I want validation for Reading Randomness. The RR thread is not a teaching course. It's just the basics and is meant as self learning. I want to do again what I did for the first student. he proved to me that he could keep going and not bonk out on a losing streak. Geez, the entire point of RR is in self control over the losing streaks.

 

Laughable nonsense!

I'll say this again. You couldn't read your way out of a wet paper bag!

 

When did you say that before?

 

Here is a possible course description foundation:

Reading Randomness Course Outline

Forward: Course Overview

Lesson 1:
The importance of using the Virtual Bet

Lesson 2:
The only characteristic that you need to know, Strong Side vs Weak Side

Lesson 3:
Seeing characteristics in a live playing chart ( visual dexterity )

Lesson 4:
Money Management: Putting trends or patterns to work with Virtual Bets

Lesson 5:
Understanding moving averages, win streaks and losing streaks

Lesson 6:
Using stop wins and stop losses ( 3 / 7 ) vs ( 3 / 28 )

Lesson 7:
Other common characteristics of trends or patterns

Lesson 8:
Using the practice software

Lesson 9:
Playing live at a Bricks & Mortar Casino

Lesson 10:
How to take all this and make a living from it

Lesson 11:
What gambling addiction Therapists and Psychologists say about gambling and the odds.
A. The House's Edge
B. Variable Change ( The Monty Hall Problem ) How this applies to Reading Randomness

 

The first question that comes to mind is that why write a book when reading randomness is a open door to fortune?

Kind regards

B

 

Can't live forever. It will still take time. It's a guess. I might get a lot of students if the course were only $9.95 - $39.95. The mathZombies want proof. Read my signature here. I just want more people. I'm trying to kick this thing off and get it going.

 

Are you suggesting charging more? The only way this has been taught like this cost $1,000 and that was to make sure the student was willing to do the work.

 

gizmotron there must be another way to proof it by using a roulette simulator computer program with fix rules regarding reading randomness because if human dissension are made during bet selection the results will differ from person to person .

Run 100 000 000 random outcomes with a positive worth wile outcome then you will have attention of lots of players.

Kind Regards

B

 

Already did that. I played at RS and one other simulator three times. Each time I won 50 sessions in a row using (1, 2) or ( 2, 2,2,2,2 etc) There were no comments. It did not impress. So I got ticked off and self destructed using doubling down to death. That worked perfectly. They declared that RR does not work. I was pleased. So I did that two more times. After 50 wins in a row using RR and showing all my bet selections and amounts all I got was crickets. So That will prove nothing.

I'm going to train and send an army of advantage players using RR into casinos all around the world and then at least the casinos themselves will begin to look at what is happening. It's a good plan. So you had better get of your ass and get while the getting is good. All I need to do is get people to do the work it takes to make lots of money. Nobody starts out a winner without earning it. The School hosting site recommends from $1,000 to $2,000 for this course. There are too many scammers in this world. That market is dead or full of people that have been burned enough. That is why I'm thinking about a fee commensurate with the price of a common gambling book.

 

At the end of the day if you do net get enough players to use your method it will also not work,but not ventured nothing gained.

Start a discord chat group with many members use your bet selection on on line casinos and make a killing and charge a percentage on wins?

Good luck with your venture bro.

Kind Regards

B

 

This will take a few months just to get it off the ground. I'll make better edited videos for instance. What I need is examples of people going at it day by day with my practice software and showing their improvement. I have all the interaction from the first student. I will try to use that a little to demonstrate what to expect and the kind of questions that people have asked in this past year. People want to know why I'm such a dick head. We must get to the bottom of that.

 

Your first student still committed to RR and how is his progress?

What is the time frame for being a proficient at RR?

Kinnd Regards

B

 

Don't know, haven't bothered him.

I spent 30 days walking him through everything I asked him to notice and learn and made sure that he was good on each step all along the way. During that time we started using the practice software and he asked questions about bet selections with that too, sometimes spin by spin. The next thirty days was spent with him flying on his own and showing me what he thought about the opportunities and the changes that can switch instantly. So we kept records of all his sessions played for those next 60 hours of personal one on one training. He produced an unbelievable 2 to 1 over all large number win to loss ratio. We are talking about a play where no progressions were ever used. I know because the telemetry in the software shows no lies. Add to that we were talking between spins. I succeeded. The RR experiment is a rudimentary self taught test. People self actuate, share results or not, succeed or not, and go on or quit.

I'm going to run this online course with milestones so that the student can see if they are not up to speed on any step of the way.

Most of the critics of RR don't even know what singles on the weak side are. They are clueless to visual dexterity. It sticks out like a thumb. They have made up their minds before ever checking it out. I'm just doing this for people that want to really win at a casino and to have a real chance. I'm using human nature as a weapon in order to protect it. I want the skeptics to keep on believing that it can't work. They are my most effective tool. They are the reason the opportunity still exists to use it.

 

gizmotron .Do you remember Lankleys(2007) even money bets selection using LW's registery on VLS Roulette with a 6 piont divider MM.Most bet selection regarding reading randomness is based on that principle.

WWW,LWLWLW,LLL and so on.

Kind regards

B

 

Hey Gizmo,

Bet selection is simple enough what I'd like to know more about is how to avoid losing streaks. Anyway, had quite good results from practice software as you know, but trying same in rng did not work that well and live dealer is just bit too fast although migh jus record the spins and see if it'd work or not.

 

It's all spelled out in the reading randomness thread. Now you can see why I'm going to make each lesson clear. After every first loss go back to a virtual bet, still making bet selections, unless you are in a streak of singles on the weak side. I've said it hundreds of times. Wait, based on your unfunded bet selections, until your first try swarm of losses ends.

If you put 0 in the amount window in the practice software those will now chart wins or losses for you and add a little hyphen to indicate virtual bet in the W L column on the far left.

 

I'm skipping a lot of spins in practice software but applying same in rng roulette does not bring same results. I will test on live dealer but for now its been shelved as getting better success rate on rng table with number repeats.

 

I was trying out online RNG, because it lets me take my time, and at first I was getting killed off. It turns out that 7 net losses is way too short a span for me. I learned a lot from RS with it's 30 net loss equivalent at 100 per bet. So I have also noticed that RNG has nice win streaks and about the same sized losing streaks. I just drop back to $1 bets until the losing streaks back off. I also get out at 3 net wins. I might play two session per day. I just keep making bets at $1. If I hit a good patch then I raise it up. In that way I'm getting the same results. They can't make you lose every bet forever, just in case there are algorithms that cheat. I was scared of the RNG at first and now I see that it was just me.