Roulette Reading Randomness

There is no other roulette thread available . Marks`s thread is right on target .
Any other complaint see the Chaplain .



ND

 

Here is what I wrote about characteristics during my double dozen days:

"On every spin I check to see if a new characteristic is forming or that any existing ones are changing. So I scan the chart. I can see a characteristic in approximately one third of a second.

Look for sleepers in the dozens and columns.
Look for singles, then doubles, triples, and larger in the dozens and columns.
Look for global effects for all this.
Look for perfect and almost perfect patterns in the dozens and columns.
Look for a perfect or almost perfect dominance in the dozens and columns.
Look for dominance in all of the even chance bets.
Look for sequences of singles, doubles, and triples and above in the even chance bets.
Look for perfect patterns in the even chance bets.
Look for sleeping zeros and wide awake zeros.
Look for any active attacked bet ending.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the current state.
Repeat this process after every spin and before every bet."

EC's
Now my first glance is looking for the strong side vs the weak side of each grouping in the chart.
Once I have identified a strong/weak side dominance I look at any patterns on the weak side?
Are there singles on the weak side in dominance?
Are there doubles on the weak side in dominance?
Are there a mix of singles & doubles in dominance on the weak side?
Is there a domination of continuous singles on both side anywhere? (chop)
Are there any huge one sided streaks?
Is there a swarm of streaks with very few singles on either side?
Are there any absence of singles dominating?

You should know what these are in the charts and be able to recognize them in just a few seconds.
You will build the skill to see the best ones and to get bets down in time. This is where this is all heading.

 

I wrote this more than 7 1/2 years ago.

"Can you see an over all continuing theme in this:"

++^^^++++^^+++^^^++^^++++^^^+++^^^^+++^^++++^^^^^+++++^^+++^^^++

 

Crickets... That's all you can hear are the crickets here in American slang.

"++^^^++++^^+++^^^++^^++++^^^+++^^^^+++^^++++^^^^^+++++^^+++^^^++"

There is an absence of singles.

I know what to do now. I'll have to create an online video teaching platform that costs about $19.95 for all admittance. Then host it at one of the finest teaching / hosting websites. Then create YouTube videos that will go viral with millions of hits.

I'm done here. I'm going to pull the downloads too. It just won't launch from here.

 

Gizmotron, I think this site is a bit similar to the old Glen just without the 'wild west' for the most part.
Readers can see what you are saying. The above is great for FTL when there are no singles.
A 12 neg progression above and you are around +40 units. Doesn't happen a lot but JK posted a shoe in the B+M Shoes thread yesterday I think which pretty much performed like above. Enough to make a nice +20 anyway without any stress.

Who cares losing a few 'test the water' bets along the way when you can get things happening like above. All you really need is an arsenal of opportunities and a bit of patience. Not rocket science as I am sure most of us would agree.

 

Thanks for listening. I liked the interaction I got from a paying student. They wanted their money's worth so they asked a lot of questions. I'm not getting a lot of questions. I have illustrated one or two good forms of reading randomness. I have a lot more to share. But this is not fun talking to the trees. I feel like this is out there somewhere in the forest.

It's funny too. You get everyone all chiming in if somebody comes up with a clever new progression. Turbo is real good at starting threads that just go on and on for months. So far all of Turbo's machinations have proven fruitless.

I'm trying to change mathematical beliefs forever. It's not going to be happening here.

 

To be a long term winner, one of the questions has to be how does someone avoid the one or two losing bets at the end of the sequence leading on to the next opportunity and how do you spot the next opportunity early enough to bag a few wins before that ends as well because not everything lasts for ever and you will get shoes where the characteristics are changing very quickly and you might only be presented with a very short window just to grab a unit here and there. That's the sort of information that is going to turn a lot of negative shoes into either break even or positive ones. But I get it, nobody who knows will discuss that and quiet honestly, why should they when a few lurkers will just steal it and sell it and you won't get any credit for it.

 

My motivation is to change the world and its beliefs about gambling. So I don't care if people steal it and claim that it is theirs. They could get it from the original source for $10. Why would they pay some joker thousands for it?

People will need to understand the wisdom of just taking three net wins. A win here or there works great for that.

They will learn from their own experience most of all. My videos will astound people. I will make the cost of access enough for paying for hosting lots of videos. It could be as low as $10 for the entire course. That's if they allow such low prices for courses. And I will go back to having fun.

 

What's funny is that the crowd are out there. How do I know? Because you only have to look at some of the gambling streams on platforms like YouTube and Twitch to see that some of these streamers have 50k subs and they have a chatroom full every other night that they need half a dozen or so moderators to keep the peace.

But they don't play Baccarat or play the EC's on Roulette. They burn through some of their affiliate cash on slots and then have a few crazy spins on roulette. So it kind of tells you where the next generation of gamblers are heading. After all gambling is supposed to be fun (so the Manager at my local B+M tried to tell me. ROFLMAO)

My advice would be to play for yourself and I think a lot of us old farts on here who like to discuss strategy are a dying breed!

 

Now there is a trend that does have a predictable outcome, "a dying breed!"

P.S. went looking at YouTube, found this interesting thing:
Gambling Channels Are the Latest Victims of YouTube's Arbitrary Moderation Process

https://www.theatlantic.com/technol...youtubes-arbitrary-moderation-process/562157/

 

Still there anyway:
https://blog.feedspot.com/casino_youtube_channels/

 

So check this out. I did a video demo.



If you put this on full screen then you can see it better.

 

Great Giz. Better than Ignatus' HG.
Could you do a long run. I laughed when you bet black and see you had not changed the bet.

 

That was 8 minutes and 15 minutes is the limit for uploads.

I suppose I could just bet, and play. I'm not kidding about going after 3 net wins.

My long run goal is to win at least three sessions for each lost session.

It's not me that needs this. It's you guys that train yourself to see the trends and to target them.

Did you download the software while it was available?

I just wanted to demonstrate how I think about conditions. I took a chance on the stronger side Black and the singles on the weak side Red. The pattern continued.

All you would see with more videos is trends that continue and trends that bust out on the first tries. The software was designed to practice.

Perhaps you don't know what value three net wins can actually be. You walk into the door of the casino and it is more than just likely that you will leave with your three net wins.

If I use $25 chips, then that's the maximum allowed at a Native American casino near me for straight up on a number. That makes bets $450. Three net wins and gone is good. I have other places where $100 chips are allowed. That's $5,400 for three net wins. And those casinos allow for $5,000 on the EC's So three of those is $15,000.

I don't need to post videos. I can post examples of really hard to win sessions. You can see what I bet on in the telemetry and you can see the amounts bet by doing simple arithmetic. That is the information that you want to know.

Anyway if you are going to do this you need to use index cards, ink pens, and a real live wheel at casino speeds. Knowing the strategy and filling out the cards in time is like playing lead guitar. If you know what you are doing then you are all over the neck without thinking about it. You need to know your extra groupings, the numbers in each set. That needs to be fast like instant recognition.

It's not me that needs to demonstrate stuff. It's you guys that need to demonstrate your sessions so that I can mentor you. If nobody is going to do this then I'm going to be forced to give up on it.

 

OK, I ran 4 winning sessions in a row, then a lost session played very badly. The video picks up at the beginning of the fourth session won, and then losses the next. It is clear to me, in that session, that I missed some real good opportunities. I also pushed trying for a fast comeback.



Is anyone trying to learn this?

 

Giz keep posting the vids, its interesting.

 

Do you have my practice software? That's the software in the videos.

 

both you guys are so smart of great ideas and intensive gambling times.

thnk you alot because i won last night another trip.

glad i find such pro players

 

So do you use some kind of charts?

Do you have my software downloaded? You could be doing your own sessions on my software.

 

I'm uploading this video to YouTube right now. It's a wild ride with sections of just playing the common variance. I never do this in a casino because it is too wild.

I play it to win. It should be in ten to fifteen minutes.

Code:

 W | B  R | O  E | L  H | 0  6 | P | S |  --  SN  --  SP 
 nb| X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  01  --  28 
 nb|    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  02  --  14 
 nb| X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  03  --  28 
 nb| X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  04  --  28 
 nb|    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  05  --  05 
 nb|    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  06  --  01 
 nb| X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  07  --  10 
 nb|    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  08  --  03 
 nb|    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  09  --  01 
 nb|    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  10  --  18 
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  11  --  20 ( $ -36 ) Low
 X-|    X |    X |    X | X    |   | X |  --  12  --  30 ( $ -36 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    | X    |   | X |  --  13  --  13 ( $ -72 ) Red
  -|    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  14  --  18 ( $ -72 ) Not Primes
 X | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  15  --  02 ( $ -34 ) Primes
 X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  16  --  12 ( $ -16 ) Red
 X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  17  --  25 ( $ 20 ) Zeros
   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  18  --  38 ( $ -20 ) Not Primes
 X | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  19  --  02 ( $ 18 ) Primes
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   |   |  --  20  --  19 ( $ -16 ) Primes
 X-|--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  21  --  38 ( $ -16 ) Specials
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  22  --  08 ( $ -52 ) Specials
 X | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  23  --  22 ( $ -16 ) Specials
 nb| X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  24  --  02  No Bet
 nb| X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  25  --  02  No Bet
 nb|    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  26  --  21  No Bet
   |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  27  --  25 ( $ -56 ) Not Specials
 X | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  28  --  24 ( $ -24 ) Not Specials
 X | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  29  --  06 ( $ 8 ) Not Specials
 X-|    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  30  --  16 ( $ 8 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  31  --  17 ( $ -28 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  32  --  11 ( $ -68 ) Not Specials
   |    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |  --  33  --  32 ( $ -108 ) Not Specials
   |    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |  --  34  --  32 ( $ -148 ) Not Specials
   |    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  35  --  05 ( $ -188 ) Not Specials
   |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  36  --  25 ( $ -228 ) Not Specials
 X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  37  --  14 ( $ -196 ) Not Specials
 X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  38  --  03 ( $ -36 ) Not Specials
 X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  39  --  14 ( $ 0 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  40  --  02 ( $ -18 ) Red
   |    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |  --  41  --  32 ( $ -54 ) Black
 X | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  42  --  17 ( $ -18 ) Black
   |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  43  --  18 ( $ -54 ) Black
   |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  44  --  18 ( $ -90 ) Black
 X | X    |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  45  --  08 ( $ -54 ) Black
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  46  --  21 ( $ -90 ) Black
   |    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |  --  47  --  34 ( $ -126 ) Black
   |    X |    X |    X | X    |   | X |  --  48  --  30 ( $ -162 ) Black
 X | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  49  --  04 ( $ -126 ) Black
 X | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  50  --  10 ( $ -90 ) Black
 X | X    | X    |    X | X    |   |   |  --  51  --  29 ( $ -54 ) Black
 X | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  52  --  10 ( $ -18 ) Black
   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  53  --  37 ( $ -54 ) Black
 X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  54  --  16 ( $ -22 ) Not Primes
   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  55  --  31 ( $ -62 ) Not Primes
 X | X    | X    | X    |    X |   | X |  --  56  --  15 ( $ -30 ) Not Primes
   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  57  --  37 ( $ -70 ) Not Primes
 X | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  58  --  24 ( $ -38 ) Not Primes
 X | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  59  --  10 ( $ -6 ) Not Primes
   |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  60  --  03 ( $ -42 ) Black
 X | X    | X    | X    |    X |   | X |  --  61  --  15 ( $ -6 ) Black
   |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  62  --  23 ( $ -42 ) Black
 X | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  63  --  20 ( $ -6 ) Black
 X | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  64  --  22 ( $ 30 ) Black
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  65  --  04 ( $ 10 ) Not Primes
 X |    X | X    | X    |    X |   |   |  --  66  --  07 ( $ 42 ) Not Primes
 X | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  67  --  04 ( $ 60 ) Black