Roulette Reading Randomness

More boost for this forum here . Get with it.

 

Mark , View the romantique holy grail thread page 3 .

 

What forum is it in?

OK, I found it.

I'm not interested in stuff like that. I know what works. No braincells will be wasted on jive turkeys and their pencil & paper theories.

 

Spike is a very conservative player. Je knows his limits with rhose on line casinos and they will never wise up to him .

I believe that he makes his set quota foe rhe month .


But his critics dee it from their perspective .

 

Hello friend, it's good to see a Brazilian active in the forum!

 

I have told those math zombies at a certain forum that a fish monger praises his ware even if it stinks .

 

...jive turkeys and their pencil & paper theories.-Gizmotron

and we were getting along so well. M'kay.

 

If you don't have live play experience with your own money then you are like only half a man. It's a matter of real context. Sure you can beat a sim. You can pretend you know what it's like. It's not the same. I can tell you.

You can go to an indoor climbing wall and do all kinds of amazing things with those giant bucket sized hand holds and foot holds. But you will in no way be ready for Yosemite Valley and those 3,000ft escarpments. It's that different. In Yosemite having a finger hold or foot hold the width of a penny to a nickel is welcome. Getting one the width of a quarter is great.

 

Giz, are you selling something or why this thread is up ? Whats the purpose ?

Btw. Im not trolling just a honest question.

 

It's all just variations on a theme and not worth wasting your time on. They take the same old crap and recycle it into new crap. Who cares.

 

Something happens in a real casino, even an online casino, that cannot be explained. Things are different when you're playing for real money, things never go the way they go on a Sim. You can be a Monopoly money billionaire at your kitchen table and when you take it to a real Casino you could be broke in 3 hours. Fact of life.

 

So true, this statement is, has been reiterated add nausea countless times throughout this forum. Those that can’t understand the subtle nuance of the statement will continue to pepper threads with the same prove it to me dross.

Run a sim , get your technical/ mechanical aspect down pat THEN play with REAL money and get your emotional/ ego/ adjustment next. Cheers

 

Just confirming a theory. For decades I was sure that if I made it simple enough everyone would latch on and over expose this. A person here suggested that I could openly explain things and it would have very little effect on the gambling world. Now that could be just me confirming his skepticism. Nevertheless there are a few here skilled at this and using it. The only people that like it are those that have worked on it and become skillful at it. Most people look for a reason for it to be worthless. Nobody would actually give away a working method after all. Look at all the trouble Spike is having dealing with the math oriented trolls. They try so hard to suggest that it is all about a fake claim of prediction. From that obvious conclusion they think there is no point in making any coherent discussion. It's just like eating your own excrement and then telling others how wonderful it is. They are so sure they know what this really is. Only none of them can see how simple it is. So I trash talk them for posing as intellect.

 

That is very important to them to try and get you to say you make predictions about random outcomes because they know this is an impossibility. The next outcome is unpredictable because it's random. The best you can do is make a guess just like everybody else in a casino who deals with random outcomes. But you want to have a little more information to make your guess a little more accurate. But it is still not a prediction. They like to pretend that prediction and guess are the same thing when they know damn well they are not.

 

Ok I understand.

I don't play roulette. I am a financial instruments trader trading mainly futures. I've been trading for a living something about 10 years now. Retired programmer. 50+ years old. My system(s) are based in some level on the same kind of principles you have. Time to time I go an search new research papers and other articles about randomness and this is why I got to know this thread. There is not much info about trading randomness. The reason is quite obvious

My point here is I will agree with you.

I see financial markets are often very similar with the roulette ECs: up or down. There is not much difference between some equity index chart compared for example to a chart generated by the red/black outcome. I've done some analysis in this.

 

Al l of Spikes critics should first post their method .

 

I got the idea from a guy that posted a youtube video on trading stocks like a casino. He got the assumptions wrong but he did show the strategy for a rigid playing style with the use of moving averages, resistance and support indicators, and buy and sell points. I took from that and came up with my three net wins or seven net losses tactics. It's very rigid and takes out greed and fear. I needed that when I wrote this thread about three years ago. You can use several randomness's characteristics to expose moving averages. I use maybe five or six main characteristics, for one example singles on the weak side, against 6 independent simultaneous groupings of EC's to expose common formed moving averages. It's very difficult to not see a time where something is in a nice condition of support or the beginnings of support. Thanks for chiming in.

 

Here is a simple script I did for Amibroker to make some visual and computer based analysis. I am using a 1M spin data from real roulette found somewhere in the forums. I can simulate different kind of groups and settings with all technical indicators (if needed) normally used in financial charting. By this way it's very easy to catch trends when looking a broader picture of the situation.

[Btw. hopefully moderator does not approve my another post I just did because it has a link and it didn't work and then came 5 minute limit while trying to fix it: that message is garbage and can be deleted]

 

Wow. It's almost exactly the same.

 

Mark, I have taken off the A - G idea . N G.