Roulette Reading Randomness

he is not the manager here?

i ask question this morning and he jump on me like i was a puppet? but i won money use his messages here and thought it was correct win ways.

now i am not sure of much i read here. thank you for answers.

 

Gizmorton is a compulsive person.Roullete ghost is ignorant.

 

Cannot wait to go mohegan .roluette is also good at fox wood but I prefer mohegan.Its been a termondous year for me wining n wining.

 

Still with the fake news You should work for CNN.

 

Yep, all true, thanks

 

Mark

I had a fairly busy weekend but I was able to record nine sessions. Eight winning sessions for one losing session. The losing session was a grind where I started positive, had a few losses, recovered and went backwards again before another partial recovery. I decided to quit when I was -36 units (2 net losses).

I have taken your advice and calculated all of my sessions as net wins and net losses. Obviously very easy to do because all of the results have been exported from the software as .txt files.

• Session 1: 3 net wins
• Session 2: 3 net wins
• Session 3: 3 net wins
• Session 4: 3 net wins
• Session 5: 3 net wins
• Session 6: 3 net wins
• Session 7: 7 net losses
• Session 8: 3 net wins
• Session 9: 3 net wins
• Session 10: 7 net wins
• Session 11: 4 net wins
• Session 12: 1 net loss
• Session 13: 3 net wins
• Session 14: 3 net wins
• Session 15: 3 net wins
• Session 16: 3 net wins
• Session 17: 3 net wins
• Session 18: 3 net wins
• Session 19: 3 net wins
• Session 20: 3 net wins
• Session 21: 3 net wins
• Session 22: 2 net losses
• Session 23: 3 net wins
• Session 24: 3 net wins
• Session 25: 3 net wins
• Session 26: 3 net wins
• Session 27: 3 net wins
• Session 28: 3 net wins
• Session 29: 3 net wins

The total of all sessions are 86 net wins and 10 net losses.

 

Gizmoron and stupid ghost are scammers they work together beaware.If they ask money for system please do not give.

 

Yup he is nutjob and a bottom feeding, scamming nutjob as well, hey hey.

 

This sounds more like what I have been expecting. Nice work on getting out of a difficult session without a total loss.

Can you say how the virtual bets have helped or hurt yet. I mean do you have any thoughts about your ability to control things?

 

What part of free to the entire world don't you get? Or is it that there is no way that anyone would do that so it must be a scam. I have played you to the hilt. It's free. It works, and you are just guessing at this point. You are like the poop on the streets of San Francisco and Los Angeles. You are homeless living in a tent on skid row in your mindset. Keep up the fake news idiots.

This is all you guys have? Watch out for the scammer, he must want something. HaHa, you are the assholes parade. There is nothing better than watching you actually try to figure this out. I told you that one day I would get you and I have. You are clueless as to what is going on here. People are learning this for free. I know it works and some of them are figuring out that it works too. When they are sure they will thank me for scamming them with the truth. I want to thank you guys for me in giving it away. It is the only way that I could figure out how to get you cornered in your own fake world and expose you for what you really are. I take it that you guys like being a public disgrace? Thanks again for showing up here and making idiots out of yourselves.

 

I have no idea what’s going on in this thread but I guarantee there is no reading random

I mean random has limits in my opinion meaning we won’t see 37 unique numbers in 37 spins.

But this doesn’t really help

 

When u think u can predict roulette numbers based on patterns which only u can see.Thats typical of visual hallucination like schizphrenic.Thinking that u r teacher and teaching people how to play roulette thats grandoise delusions.Blaming media fake news for ur illness its typical of paranoia.

 

I'm sort of glad that you don't know what's going on in this thread. Perhaps people will call it something else that the mathematicians will classify it as. Perhaps "Reading Randomness" is just too radical considering some of the definitions for randomness that are already out there. I also agree that random has limits. I don't really care what is at the far edges of what is possible. I make this work with common occurrences most of the time. Random has common occurrences. I show people how to see this.

It's not really reading randomness. It's a little spotted magical frog sitting on a sequined paisley mushroom that tells me the next spins. I put that magic in my practice software. I'm selling this secret through psychic projections. The idiots have been right all along. They even have gotten secret information from the Russians. And best of all, this forum with its 35 to 50 visitors at a time is the secret hiding place of Shangri La.

 

The virtual bets have helped. It stops you rushing into anything on the spur of a moment.

The only time I feel confident about controlling things is when the pattern is very strong. See the image below (odds and evens). From spin 11 until spin 21 in was a classic 'chop'. I felt very confident when betting this pattern. Apart form a miss when a zero landed it felt very easy.

One thing I'm terrible at is betting on a dominant side. You have demonstrated this in your videos. For instance, there might be seven reds in a row. You bet red again, and red lands - easy win. I'm terrible at picking these bets. As soon as I establish a dominant side, I place the bet and it switches. Very frustrating! Because of this I have stopped placing these bets.

Cheers Mark.

 

Wouldn't the world be a fun place if you could answer all softball questions and make yourself out to be smart because of it? You clearly can't read and even if you do see the words, somehow that crap you use to think with just can't register it. Just who are you talking to? Do you actually think that anyone is scared and believes your warnings? This thread talks clearly about the topic of prediction near the beginning. You don't read, but just comment like a happy turd in your mouth and that dumb shit eating grin of your face. People always ask, why is he so happy with that shit eating grin? Frank, here , is an idiot that loves to warn people about not stepping on the crack or it will break your back. Beware of those that can do this Frank. The more there are the more you will call the world a fool. Can't wait to see you do your Don Quixote bit. What a pathetic jerk you are.

 

I try to get one win off of a strong side streak. I bet before I see 7 in a row. It's rare to get 8 in a row or higher. Anyway it's not comfortable to place any first try bet. If you see a swarm of 6, 7, 8 etc.. across the chart then you have a global swarm of the same character. Try to get one off of each streak, one bet at a time. I never bet two or three different bets all at once.

 

Every casino roulette wheels are different. They behave differently. No one can predict the pattern.Simple stratergy is to review wheel for days to see if red or black even or odd 1 to 18 or 19 to 36 which comes more.Wheel is important not the mathematics or statistics.I have found some tables have tendency to have more even and 19 to 36 numbers.It took me almost 7 month to get it straight.Now I have been wining consistently for more than a year.

 

Gizmoron math formula of roulette is 6%96$96£96÷96?9

 

Cheers Mark. That's good advice. I'll keep it in mind next time.

 

More gambler's fallacy.

Gambler's fallacy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



The gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy or the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the mistaken belief that if something happens more frequently than normal during a given period, it will happen less frequently in the future (or vice versa). In situations where the outcome being observed is truly random and consists of independent trials of a random process, this belief is false. The fallacy can arise in many situations, but is most strongly associated with gambling, where it is common among players.

The term "Monte Carlo fallacy" originates from the best known example of the phenomenon, which occurred in the Monte Carlo Casino in 1913.[1]