Roulette Reading Randomness

Hi Gizmo
I found this thread a few days ago, read and just downloaded software ready to start practising.

Cheers

 

What software should I practice with 1.4 or 1.5? the reason I ask is you say there is a bug in 1.5

 

Use the 1.4 with graph. I only put up the 1.5 version to show where this was going with the first student. The basics and flat betting are the best way to practice.

The log in for the 1.4 with graph is in this section. You need to be logged in to see the picture of the access key.
Here: https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/reading-randomness-practice-software-1-4g-with-graph.15233/

Have fun.

 

Today is the day. I'm going to rip the lid off of known logic. Today you will see with ease how this works.

Let's go back to when my own eyes were first opened wider. I knew I was already on to winning monster sized win streaks. I also knew that I had self control problems. I didn't mind taking a hit, like a professional boxer does in order to deliver a hit. So I would dig deep holes in every session that I played in. I never had a large enough bankroll to stand in the ring against the casino with my limited bankrolls. The casino has an endless supply bankroll. So it all added up to me having what I call self control issues. I'm going to let you see the video that changed everything for me. Adam Khoo here doesn't even see it. He talks right over the example that changes everything and doesn't even know it. He shows a 10% guessing advantage and does not see this as enough to beat a casino. But I do. I will make a video today that will open everyone's eyes.

So try to keep in mind that for the past 13+ years I have always said that you can use any consistent bet selection to do this or to use this. Here is Adam Khoo's video:

 

so how many units everyone has won with it over 3 months period

 

Somebody on ignore wants to know how many have won in the past three months. Well, actually 70 days now, and nobody was winning anything on day one, July 20th. This is how real people do it. They study with the provided tools and gain the skills to do it. Some are showing real progress after 2 weeks. My hopes are that you will stay very cool and not bother with this. You are beyond cool.
-------------------------------------------

I have always said that you can use any consistent bet selection to use this method. So let's use Wesley Snipes' suggestion in the "Passenger 57" movie, where he says "always bet on black."

That is all that is needed to explain what I did with Adam Khoo's video idea. Did you know that Gonzalo García-Pelayo and his family marched across Europe and Las Vegas in the early 90's with just a 6% advantage against a house payout disadvantage of 2.7% and made millions, until the casinos caught on that is? Do you know that card counters wait to be in a phase of opportunity to increase their bet values? That is how they take advantage of the casino.

I will now show you a way to capitalize on coincidental changes. You can lose all or more of the bets that are expected to be lost due to common-sense everyday probability formula and still come out way ahead monetarily. If you treat a gambling session as a single event, and do what I suggest, become good at it, then you should be able to get a better over-all take from your gambling sessions than the known expectations of just about everyone on planet earth.

So here is the eye opening video:

 

in the video the trend goes minus 30 units or so downside. How low you recommend to go before start jumping in. Is 30 minimum, which notifies us ahaa, now it is time for chart to go opposite

 

You need to smoke a lot more hemp before you will know the secret. Why would you feed a losing streak if it is still going down? There is no magic number. One loss is a possible pattern for singles on the weak side or it's the beginning of more losses. You need to develop experience dealing with the unknown. Your quest for a set of rules is the problem. Every session is different and every situation presents it's own best solution to win. Every spin I ask myself what would it take right now to win. Even if you had a book full of rules you would still need to have the ability to know which rule fits the best conditions at the right time. I can't give you that answers. You need to learn the skill and then develop the experience, your own experience. Then you will be able to get the answers that make sense to you. This is up to you. It's not for me to sit back and give you answers to questions that are best figured out on your own.

 

but why then videos, where you act according to lower trends and telling it goes up probably. Same thing Adam khoo told, you showed in your own video
Answers are there, so why be against it. The best way tackle this is what adam kho you, and nathan detroid have told with stop loss.
if it even works long term

 

Develop your own style then. I give you answers and all you do is give me disagreements. You are what is known as a full cup in Zen philosophy. You already know the path that you want to walk. Don't waste your time trying to teach me. You want to be the guide then start your own cult. Make a new thread where people will study your gambling savvy. In this thread you are not learning anything. You are trying to teach. I don't want you here. I don't need to give you attention. You need to earn that. So far all you have done is proven that you are not willing to learn. I have you on ignore. Now I'm banishing you to the outer darkness. If you keep trying to clog this thread with your disagreements then many here will have you labeled as a troll.

 

Why would you feed a losing streak if it is still going down?
it was against your video you tried to teach and me question why opposite acting is not trolling or whatsoever.
i dont disagree with you but its conflicted opinions on your posts, like trying to confuse peoples :O
i was just trying to tell what kim choo in video and you described in video and trying to give light stop loss in these cases is most balanced behaviour. Im atleast having conversation about your posts to wider or confirm your ideas that its good, thats what you look for...
but okay if you dont want me post here i wont anymore. its your thread. you make the rules

 

I read all thread.

My englush hard to write,

But read the r19 troll thread, super serious yes, he is one of the 5.

Tgats the rules!

 

i too found this thread interesting recently much like Valvo. Gizmo you seem very strong in your belief of reading randomness and beating roulette with this ability, i read up to page 12 and its hard to filter out the banter, were you able to prove you can predict the out-come before hand from a real life past live wheel? can you do it 10 times over? can you double your bankroll of 10 units 100 times over ? if so you got my attention. one thing you said i liked was you can't predict the future by past results but you also said look at what trends you are in do you mean winning/lossing mode/cycles? i always got mixed results when i tried to capitalize on it nothing solid, with your EC strategy wouldn't it be better to play baccarat w/o the zero's attacking your bankroll? the simplest approach is the best approach imo

again it would have to boil down to you predicting the future results that already happened that was set in stone so it could not be tampered with since we can not all meet up with you at a certain location it would be one of those things you have to see to believe next best thing would be proving with past results from a live roulette wheel or real time wheel

 

Nobody can predict the future. But nobody can predict that a wins streak is full of first try attempts. Nothing can stop a win streak from being full of first try bets. The same goes for losing streaks. There is no math when it comes to observing conditions. It's all coincidental. Everything that happens does so just by coincidence. Now this is why this skill works. You can see when your guesses, and that is all that they are, you can see if they are working or not. You have to look for that. This is a skill. You test the waters with bets. I use Roulette because when I track results in my charts or my practice software I see way more than just one group like Baccarat or Craps. In this case more is way better. Red & Black can just suck but Odd & Even could be in a world class super streak of opportunity. Everything is based on the first bet attempt. It takes a net loss of seven lost first bets in the aggregate to lose a session. This thread and the skill explains why. It is actually very hard to get a swarm of first try losses.

I suggest that you learn from the videos and charts posted that actually begin on page 12 of this thread. You need to practice to get good at this. There is no danger of losing any money in order to master this skill. You will be able to confirm your own win to loss ratio after you practice and learn this skill. I just wanted you to know that this is all about conditional awareness and not prediction and that things happen by coincidence and not by some divine secret knowledge or capability.

 

I found this thread around a week ago, read through and liked what I saw. I copied and pasted all relevant info from Gizmo, Jono, a couple of others into a word document and read through a few more times. Downloaded the practice software and started practicing. After a while it all starts to make sense what Gizmo's saying and I'm already getting above the 3 wins to 1 loss.

 

id pay money for a system a proven system, something i can use w/o the house kicking me out if i can get back what i paid in 1-4 weeks or even more while drinking a free beer while doing so then whats the issue? like the famous quote from tales from the crypt "death of some salesman" we like to see it work before we buy it =) ofcourse no one is going to give something away for nothing so its always that stand still..

 

Smart idea. Filtering out the distractions is a very good idea. I wonder how to explain to a person that has not practiced this and gotten better at it what it is. I show the technique and the change happens over a short time. Jono is smart. He is not convinced, even after 100 sessions. I'm sure that after 100 real casino sessions he will be sure, or more sure of his win to loss ratio. Thanks for sharing your progress.

 

Once this is proven it will only be a matter of time for it to be shut down. They will first take away the Marquee and hand written charting. They will give this a catchy name. It will be a rule like no card counting tolerated. They will say no past spin charting or something like that. They will try no virtual betting schemes next. They may raise the minimum bet and lower the maximum bet. It will end live online Roulette. Only cheating online RNG Roulette will be allowed.

As far as it being free goes. I did charge during the development phase. I did not charge much considering what it is worth. 2.5 years ago somebody on this forum suggested looking at Adam Khoo's video on trading like a casino. I took my reading randomness skills, applied them to even chance betting, and worked out a virtual betting scheme at the very end. This was the final version. I then charged one person about $8.33 per hour to be personally tutored. Once again, not a lot of money. This person was used by me to develop and beta test the 1.4g practice software. At the very end of the 60 days, two hours per day, I added virtual betting as the finishing touches. This student proved a 4.66 to 1 win ratio for sessions without virtual bets. That calculates out to a 2 to 1 monitory win rate. If you get 15 net wins at $100 per bet and 7 net losses at $100 then you have 2 to 1 as a rounded number. You subtract the losses from the wins and you have 100% for every 5 to 6 sessions. That comes to a 20% advantage for each session. This is in a game that is supposed to be 47% to 53%. It changes the game to 60% to 40%.

So I did charge money at first. I got a research assistant that was clearly motivated to learn. So the question you are really asking is why is it free if it works. None of us can live forever as all our bodies will fail at some point. I'm an adventurer that has spent his entire life learning new things that are hard to achieve. I had the time and so I took it. I was one of the very first ski mountaineers in the USA. I was a second generation Yosemite rock climber, right at the end of the Golden Age of Yosemite rock climbing. I mastered construction craftsmanship and construction business practices. I was there at the Golden age of windsurfing and mastered that. I took martial arts for years. I got my USGA golf handicap down to single digits for a while. I won a couple high score trophies in Bowling tournaments. I did real well in archery marksmanship as my first sport. I self taught computer programming. I'm a trained recording studio designer and operator. I schooled in artist management and entertainment concepts. I play the guitar. I know who is telling the truth in politics. ... and I gamble too. I figured all this out on my own while being resisted all the way there. It's free because I want this mountain top too. It needs to be free in order for me to see that it makes it. I have been living with the same heart failure for the past ten years. I'm actually surprised that I have lived this long. So you can take it or leave it based on your skepticism. You read human nature just like I do. Nobody would give away a working method. So add to my vast skills comedian. I'm cracking the joke of the century. All that I can suggest here is don't let the joke be on you.

 

Mark, I'm fairly certain your method offers a substantial advantage. The only question is how much of an advantage? Obviously some people will do better than others.

Being a fair distance from the nearest B & M, means I can't just visit the casino for a couple of hours. Also, in Australia we are not able to access online casinos, so RNG for real money is not an option either. I will plan a weekend visit to a B & M in the future.

In the meantime I can continue practicing.... Most recent results below.

Sessions 101 - 120. 100% flat-bet.
Session 101: 3 net wins
Session 102: 3 net wins
Session 103: 3 net wins
Session 104: 3 net wins
Session 105: 3 net wins
Session 106: 1 net win
Session 107: 3 net wins
Session 108: 3 net wins
Session 109: 4 net wins
Session 110: 3 net wins
Session 111: 2 net wins
Session 112: 3 net wins
Session 113: 7 net losses
Session 114: 3 net wins
Session 115: 3 net wins
Session 116: 1 net win
Session 117: 3 net wins
Session 118: 3 net wins
Session 119: 3 net wins
Session 120: 3 net wins

20 Sessions flat-bet
Net wins: 53 | Net losses: 7

 

Jono, I have the same problem. So I stay over night three nights. It's also 350 miles one way. So I rent a car and drive there, do one session, then sleep. I do two sessions the next two days each for a total of five sessions for the trip. I return the next day and drop off the rental car. So I must win to make all this work. It's all a work expense. If I take the RV I can't right off the expenses. Funny tax laws here.