Roulette Reading Randomness

Bro you're here to teach your grail and you even don't dare to say how much you done since all those years... Denzie is a bit right to ask himself legitimate questions...

 

Santa Claus Day on December 6th , Enjoy !

 

As a Santa Day gift Sharptracker will will post his secret Holy Grail in lieu of big talk.

 

Any other complaints see the chaplain.

 

I never , ever made any promise to publish the holy grail or do any teachings of systems when I joined the Gamblin Forums .

Go and fuck the duck else where for free information you blood sucking system leeches .,

 

Today I won both sessions, BUT in the first I wasted too many good opportunities, because of my previous bad luck run I was afraid to bet and win.
Regarding the second session it was many exciting patterns to enter, but I kept betting on them despite the unlucky losing mini trend and quickly dig a hole, though I managed to recover.

 

Where that gizmouton is talking about 50k in this 61 pages of nonsense... i wanna laugh while eating pop corn

 

TyGiz,


On a positive I am wishing you the best pf winnings in the future one have fulfilled your 30 days of testing.



ND

 

Too late . The $ 50 k were paid to the winner of the last baloney festival with longest Salami , a china man UnBal Hung Too Low of Macau .

 

TYGIZ ,


Please forgive the 2 typos .



ND

 

Thank you for your kind wishes. No problem, I make typos and grammar errors all the time. Best of luck to you as well.

I find it funny how gizmo included or dedicated the "007" in the software password. Maybe it was a nice friendly gesture or just a coincidence.

 

James Bond was a gambler that always wins. Well except for the first round of poker in the new version of "Casino Royal." That's why 007.

 

It was not easy at all, but I kept playing until I won all of them.
Profit should have been cut at 3 units. I cheated just to see what would happen if I continue.

 

Today randomness patterns proved to be loser. I failed with them 4 times out of 9 session.
Overall I lost 13 units in total.
Playing with 450 units flat as suggested would cost -$5820 and would wipe out my bankroll.
Beware NOT play this method with less than 100 units bankroll, otherwise a losing streak would destroy you.

 

I have to admit that my self control and patience clearly lacked today as I bet lot more often than I should. Also I had a few exit point where I clearly had a chance to cut my losses, but I kept betting till I forced a failure in the spirit of 3 vs 7.
I could have won just as easily, but this time I did not.
Many times I lose because I keep feeding a losing streak, because virtual bet wins frustrate me when I notice a good pattern.
I would rather play continous style or just simply do not bet at all, then to virtual win then lose for real because of bad luck. Of course this would lead to more losses, but perhaps a few easy wins would still balance things out. If gizmo's patterns have any merit and better than random guesses then there should be a clear edge, hence there is no need to have this virtual bet rationalization loop hole.

I also know it is easy to rationalize the losses, but when it works I also play the same way.

 

Now you know why I came up with 3 & 7. For years I would wait until my losses piled up. I would go very deep into my bankroll waiting for the monster sized win streak. All this was done betting small bets on each spin. Then I would attack the super win streak with larger and larger bets and not only recover but just blast right into a huge win. I did this for more than 10 years. It wasn't working. I knew that those super win streaks would happen at least once in a ten hour session. It's easy to get into a habit of going deep into the bankroll and not minding. Virtual bets are a way to stay out of the big hole while you wait for the killer sequence of life. People have heard me say for years that there is always that killer sequence of death that kills all progressions. Well there are also killer sequences of life that open up huge doors of opportunity with reading randomness. You just have to wait for them without getting killed off by attrition in the process.

So if you must bet every spin then bet the minimum table limit until you are in a great big win streak. I hope you understand that if you can get 3 net wins at least that most of the time you don't have to play for ten hours per session. That's 300 spins on a weekend at a B&M casino. I tend to get my three net wins in an hour or two, three at the most.

There is a side of this randomness stuff that is always there. Between a trend is a nothing. Well if you are seeing nothing then all you have to do is ask yourself what nothing would do next if it were to continue. I'm a master at finding things that continue. I just want to chip away at it one win at a time. I feed off of nothing and chaos just like I do singles on the week side. Everything you see in the chart is information that is useful. You just have to find those times when your guesses are working. They work as chaos at times so you don't want to try and get ahead during those times. Only attack the win streaks. The more things that you can see that continue or swarm as a bunch of continuing features the more likely it is that you can get those few wins.

That guy that gave me $5,000 use to refer to all this as a monkey on his back that he had to deal with. He got it from a sport's psychologist that lives and writes books in England. He would play $200,000 won sessions or it was not worth his time. He uses the low bet and the big bet method too. He made a point that your big bet should be as much as 20 times the size of your small bet in order to play this style and bet on each spin. In a way his small bet was his virtual bet. He was a trend and pattern hunter too. But he only played Baccarat with a single grouping, Banker or Player. So he never developed this kind of reading characteristics and continuation detecting skills on a scale that my charts are capable of.

I hope you understand that chaos and nothing has a way about itself too. All it has to do is streak for a while. The absence of singles on the weak side is information. All you need to do is ask yourself what will it do next if this absence were to continue. I hope that gives you more to think about.

We love it when we see 20 Reds in a row. But what if you could see 50 absences of singles on the weak side in a row? Can you get one win in the aggregate from that stretch? Try to imagine how to see things that continue where you never thought to look for them before. You will laugh once you see them. A total absence of triples is a thing. Singles with triples or larger but never doubles is a characteristic. I've showed you how to walk. But only you can show yourself how to run. I try to look at all this by attempting to see the biggest picture.

 

Here are today sessions. I played a total of 900 spins and 20 sessions in about 90 minutes.

 

Overall it resulted in break even. 14 won / 6 loss
On an interesting note 3 losing sessions in a row never occured to me during my testing phase.
So a double up after 2 losing sessions should result in profit.

 

By the way these are all real sessions with me implementing virtual bets.
My decision making ability got much quicker with a lot of practice. I recognize most betting opportunities in seconds then I decide on the course of action to take.
There are an abundance of patterns to look for, but only a few of them results in profit.

 

Sharp Tracker ,



You are still expecting the HG? Make an appointment with Dr. Sidney Friedman .