Roulette Reading Randomness

Today I played total of 10 sessions. I abused virtual bets as much as I could, I even abandoned a few hopeless sessions before reaching my profit goal. At the end I hardly made 1 (3) unit profit.
This is the end of my daily public testing with play logs.
The last 60 session for over 4k spins I failed bady with Reading Randomness.
If you are expecting a holy grail method look further. This is not one.

 

Progression after 2 lost session would improve on this strategy, at least on the short term without risking much.

Regarding the precognition/remote viewing method. Those who tried it with success made over 10k unit in profit playing flat in a short time frame.
It is the next best direction to explore.

 

What progression do you have in mind ?

 

After two consecutive full loss session double your base flat bet on your third session. After that continue as usual.
It is good one since 3 lost session in a row is a very rare event.

 

I have an idea which might help mitigate some losing runs and make this system smoother.
Keep tracking the flow of the game with virtual bets.
Only place virtual bets on strong patterns.
If more patterns break down on first try virtual bets, then continue by switching your play style to betting on patterns to end rather than continue.
You can even try a mild 1-1-2 step negative marti progression in these sessions, but only play them when you are more confident in your picks.
I think this is a more advanced method.

 

Here is an example how I utilized the idea of betting on patterns to end in a bed sesion for profit.

In these scenarios betting on favourable pattens would result in long grind of stuggle and frustration accomponied by accumulation of losses.

 

Taking action in view of diminishing probabilities ( a trending EC) is no vice but a bonafide possible winning method .




Play at your own risk .
.

 

I abandoned this method. It does not work for me.
I really wanted this to work, but I do not want to play with progessions.
Flat bets does not produce enough juice to worth the squeeze considering the risk.

If anyone have good results I am still interested to hear about it.

Jono1167 are you still testing this method?

 

Ty,

What you need is a system not a by product like reading randomness.



Merry Christmas .

 

Finally, by chance, I got the strongest proof that this jbs is DSchles [Don Schlesinger]! I made that true remark in two of my previous posts in GamblingForums. DSchles attacked me like a venomous spider crawling in the dark. More on the topic:

• https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rec.gambling.blackjack/ALKEZOXuqU4
• “New American Psycho: Don Schlesinger of Blackjack Fame.”

DSchles [Don Schlesinger] and his GF/BF Norman Wattenberger are also inveterate enemies of gambling author John Patrick. Their hatred is probably driven by jealousy — all three are gambling writers. My aversion towards the three, including John Patrick, is content-driven. I do have serious problems with their “theories”.

John Patrick especially was a notorious casino employee entitled with the serious task of PR. You might want to read:
• https://saliu .com/bbs/messages/587.html
• “Anti-Gambler Advice from John Patrick, Gambling Author, Casino Mole, Conspirator.”

Ion Saliu
Founder of Gambling Mathematics
Founder of Roulette Mathematics
Founder of Blackjack Mathematics

“A good man is an axiomatic man; an axiomatic man is a happy man. Be axiomatic!”

 

Kokodrilos (royalty-name for Big-Time Gamblers):


My previous post was “inspired” by the concept of randomness in the title of this thread. I only read the first posts. The topic did trigger the usual bickering oh-so-characteristic of the gambling forums.

I do get myself in fights, especially when I am attacked. It happened with the main protagonists of this thread: the OP (Gizmotron “Cabron”) and Junky Monkey (aka Junket King).

Both talk about the same gambling system as I presented many years ago on my website. It is known the world over as theory of streaks, as a fundamental part of gambling mathematics. I have also posted in these very GamblingForums on the theory of streaks and gambling systems derived from the theory.

Both reciprocally-inveterate posters “read” streaks and try to figure out their repeatability. The streaks are mostly known as patterns in baccarat.

I ran that grandiose piece of probability software known as Streaks.exe all over the world. The program generates reports regarding the number of like-length streaks in various numbers of trials.

For example, the even-bet in roulette has a probability p=18/37 (single-zero). The same probability can be accepted for baccarat as well. How many 4-consecutive streaks or patterns are there possible? The answer depends on the number of trials N:
• 1 streak of length 4 in 100 spins (number of trials)
• 3 streaks of length 4 in 200 spins (number of trials)
• 15 streaks of length 4 in 1000 spins (number of trials).

The software generated also the streaks reports for the 2-to-1 bets (e.g. dozens); p=12/37. You can see the reports in these very GamblingForums, this Roulette sub-forum. I started the thread titled:

• The Best of Roulette — Theory, Mathematics, Betting Systems, Strategies, Software
• https://www.gamblingforums.com/thre...ting-systems-strategies-software.15752/page-6


Ion Saliu
Founder of Roulette Mathematics
“A good man is an axiomatic man; an axiomatic man is a happy man. Be axiomatic!”

 

So if i think JP writes nonsense also then i am jbs 's cousin... Alright...

 

The Ship of Fools drifting along .................

 

Ce-ai ba, mielu turbat al lu Mnezau si S'nt Ketru? What's with you, rabid lamb of G'd and S'int Keter?

jbs expresses his hatred toward John Patrick the same way he and his GF/BF did in other forums, in the same venomous style. jbs expresses his hatred toward yours truly the same way he, DSchless and his GF/BF have done in other forums, and here too.

The old pharts who do nothing, but bicker and ruminate in gambling forums! Day in, and day out… beginning with the atrocious GG!!!

My posts are about gambling mathematics, insane crooks and kooks and mooks. It aint specifically about bickering — I only respond to bickering when leveled at me…

 

There are lies , there are damn lies and there are statistics and those are the worst kind of all of them . Israeli Brit . PM

Just a reminder .

 

Everything is a statistic or stat, doofus! Things happen — they are recorded as stats. Every plan (i.e. the future) is molded on stats. Your pension that keeps you napping in your old-phart rocking-chair was calculated based on stats — your earnings when you worked.

The statistics means: The past counts. It applies to roulette as well, to all gambling, for that matter. The results matter.

 

This belongs here:

 

Parpaluck,

Are you implying that past results (the numbers that have hit) some how affect the future spins?

 

He does. You can see how for $39.95.

 

Maybe the title reading randomness should be changed to Casing the Joint . The only way ti get those Wise Guys attentioTalkomg their lingo is the key to catch their attention .