Roulette Reading Randomness

How about
The holy gizmo ( holy grail)

I actually do this after initial read of your thread of some time ago, here in skipptophia we only have single zero although there are a couple of double zero tables just recently installed in the casinoverse here. I know you basically also placed wager on individual numbers and even chance, as per your thread, I never bothered with that but only flat bet out the three even chance wager, very profitable. No need to over tax my brain as I took a break from baccarat etc.
Cheers

 

Yep, having multiple streams of data makes finding working opportunities more frequent. I only play craps to unwind. It's fun to watch players blow up or get crazy with excitement. I practice my stand off bet. It's very low key and relaxing. It's just one data stream.

 

Reading Randomness is waiting for it to be playing your game. It always has been since 2006. It's published here in the Roulette section. It tells you how it works. The thread serves as a self taught instruction tutorial and allows you to prove to yourself that it works. It does this so that you won't need to spend any money on learning to gamble before becoming an expert at it.

 

Mark, Keep on posting on this forum .Let other forum wither on the vine . You are receiving no benefits

posting there.

When I have had it with the bacc crowd I increased my postings on your forum .Just to keep roulette in

the limelight .

You do mot need those extra clowns who are there only for their OWN benefit to show hoe smart they think they are .

Not to mention any names but they are very much basking in their own limr light .

 

Yes, I see that advantage. I need to show how smart I am. Good thinking.

 

Giz, I stopped at spin 144. From that point I just zigzagged on 2 columns; using red/black much easier

 

Man that is a long battle.

 

Gizmo It’s 1st spin, so know nothing. Black hits #17. Now, don’t have to bet, but what bet is available? Follow for black or bet chop, red. Win.

Now see it’s 50/50. No-bet.

Okay it’s B-R-B. Could bet chop or bet black follows. Chop lost.

It’s B-R-B-B; it’s looking like black. Bet black, win.

Now, having 2 columns to work with, be it 1-2 or 1-3 or 2-3. What column starts black? Column 2 starts with a black #2. So, bet starts black and win.

If the bet lost certain columns favour black over red when zigzagging. There are options for choice of colour; could say it’s reading random?

 

I just look for anything that is continuing. If I win then I'm done as I have moved to one single net win and done. But when I lose I fight a small battle. This includes no bet spins and searching. It all comes down to how difficult it is to battle back to even. Sometimes I just accept the loss. But that is rare. I use to get two of the three net wins real easy and then that third net win could take forever. If it is not playing your game as Spike puts it then wait until it is working. That's what virtual bets are for. They cost you nothing. I have never seen it go on forever not working. It always eventually comes back to working.

 

Just go for it

 

As I've said before do you see lots of chopping when playing?
As you're looking for pattern or say a trend. Above is not many spins; but you can see B-R-R. There's #2B then #1R. Bet for Red, lose. The old fly in the ointment, zero. Now you could say #2B starts the column betting/zigzagging, as i've lost. 2-1-0 is B-R-G. So, next colour to bet is black thru #'s 4 or 6. It wins.

 

I see chop. But I also see singles or doubles. I see one side all strong. I see sleeping dozens. I see perfect shaped patterns. It's all a guess. Sometimes it's working and sometimes it is not. You gain experience avoiding when it's not working. That's what cracks me up about the system players. They like to say that trends can't tell the future so they are useless. But they can tell when they are working and when they aren't. You see, it takes a wrecking ball to get through to the mathBoyz and progression players. Who cares if they don't get it.

 

Here is the deal. We could both see the exact same spins and use the exact same charts. You will see things that I might not. You try them and if they are working then you keep going. I often don't see things that are stronger had I used them. It does not matter. All I want is to win that session. Many things work at the same time. You also get a mix of some things working and some not. Big deal. I just get in and get out. It's so easy even a mathBoyz can do it.

 

Yes exactly you make a guess. I follow the zigzag or if a colour is trending start with the trending colour.

 

I use one basic rule of thumb. Any lost bet is an indicator that it is not working. A swarm of lost bets is nothing but trouble. I don't mean back to back either. You can wait a while and then get more lost bets between waiting. That's what I mean by a difficult session. I hate difficult sessions. They are a waste of time. Just accept that randomness is not a perfect way to treat a casino like an ATM machine. You must back off and get out of its way when it acts like that. This is the best part. It comes right back and works. You just have to wait.

 

Has RFcc kicked the bucket? Ditto for Alrelax BS ?


Well some forums here will suffer the same fate soon.


Their days are numbered .


Dead fish like the OG.

 

I came to the same conclusion eventually. One or two wins is usually easy but for some reason that third win can be real hard a lot of the times. All my money sessions are for one or two units now and have been for a long time. It's just not worth my time to try and win four or five and there's no point in it. I'm looking to make a monetary goal which I can do in one or two wins. Why would I spread it out further if I don't have to. This is something people just do not understand. They tell me if you can win why don't you just play and play and play. It's like asking a professional singer why don't you just sing and sing and sing. Because it's work, because it's not fun, because I don't really like gambling I'm just doing this to make money. I've never done drugs in my life and in my younger days my friends would tell me I would make the perfect drug dealer because I would never do my own drugs. Gamblers are the worst people to learn gambling systems because they don't know how to control themselves. They love the action just for the sake of the action and I do not.

 

I have very few rules that are hard and fast. But after one loss I back off and wait to see what's happening. Because I don't look at losing as luck or a fluke I look at it as I made the wrong choice when every indicator said I was making the right choice so it might mean that the outcomes are not playing my game. Sometimes it is a fluke, like a rogue wave is a fluke. But I'm not going to bet again until I find out. I like to win one or two units and get out. Sitting there fighting for one or two units pisses me off because I know I don't need to be doing that. I know I will get there eventually, I just don't like it. I'm trying to win two units I usually have a rule that says I don't bet again right after a win. But sometimes I do it depends on how good it looks. You need to have a huge amount of discipline to play this and most gamblers don't have any discipline at all. This is why roulette is so hard to beat. When I'm playing virtually I've had runs where I make 15 or 20 right choices in a row. But I know I would never do this playing for real money because things are just different. What winning 15 or 20 in a row virtually tells me is that I can easily win two in a row. A gambler would look at it and say he's going for the 15 or 20 in a row every time. And never get it.

 

You are using your experience. This can not be taught. You can tell people that this is important but they will not use it until they have experience too. Your idea to go after just one net win is actually easier. ND loves John Patrick's Up & Pull with 2, 1 or 2, 1, 2 etc... I hate the idea of needing to get two wins in a row. I'm starting to really like one net win and out. I'm having fun over at R-Sim. I'm testing to see if a 6 to 1 bankroll is just about right. If I want to make $50 then I bring $300 which is 6 times $50. It's pretty good. All this getting ready to go back to Bovada.

 

It is easier to play one net win online because there is no hurry. You can sit there as long as you want looking at 50 spins an hour on Bovada or 90 spins an hour on evolution. The math people will say one win in 10 different sessions is the same as 10 wins in a row in one session because all sessions are connected. They absolutely are not connected. I play a very specific game inside the outcomes in roulette. When I win and get out that session is over and is not connected in any way to the next session I play. It would only be connected if I was playing a random game with random outcomes and I am not. This is something the math boys never talk about. All of their math only applies to playing randomly with random outcomes.