Roulette Reading Randomness

He's an incredibly destructive malignant narcissist. He thrives on making people his narcissistic supply by controlling them. If you won't do that then he sets out to get rid of you. He has no way of seeing that in himself. He will never change.

 

Wow, 18,000+ views since it went over 300,000 views, and I only just disclosed that it's only the basics in an old Apophenia thread. Talk about Hidden Figures. Great movie BTW. They had to solve yet unknown math to get out of orbit without getting killed by being lost a sea. It's funny how math will one day solve this. It has to because it invalidates Frequentism.

 

Then bet selection cc is gone ?

 

I just looked it up. It's still there. My section is locked. That guy hates me.

 

Mark,

Regarding Lung yeh HPB 2 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 . Should the second 3 be a loss you still had 5 wins .

But considering the diminishing probabilities I feel more comfortable with the 3 2 1 .

 

It's like being at the gun range. If it takes you four or five attempts to hit the bullseye, why don't you just keep practicing until you can hit the bullseye almost every time. Much more efficient, less time-consuming, and it will pay off in spades if you ever have to use your shooting skills for anything other than target practice.

 

Yep, I don't need wins in a row. I'm flat betting the funded bets. People should understand that there are small waves among the big waves. I take one win off of each small wave. There is no point in pushing to the edge of micro upswings. When you win one then if you go for a second win you risk falling back to where you started. If you are going for three in a row then you need that second win first. If that wins and the third one loses, all being a lot of work to get three in a row, you are back to where you would be if you just went for one win.

 

Yep. It's a logical conclusion anybody would come to when actually playing this for money. Any more than one bet and one win is a total waste of time. This is how you can tell the amateurs from the professionals, they all think you just play and play and play and constantly expose your bankroll to the casinos endless bankroll. I don't care what my edge is, that is a stupid thing to do.

 

ND already said it. If you want more money bring more money and use bigger bets, not more of them.

 

Yet how many people do that. In my 16 years of playing roulette I've never seen anybody make one unit and leave.

 

I did. He was betting on single dozens at a time and using $1,000 bets. He swooped in, lost a couple and then won a couple and split. He was taking at least $1,000 a visit. I never saw him again.

 

I was in Vegas years ago when a airline pilot and a stewardess we're checking out of the hotel when they stopped by the roulette table and pooled their remaining money together and placed $1,000 on red. It came up double zero and I thought the guy was going to pop a vein in his forehead because he looked like a fool in front of the stewardess. He started screaming at the dealer that the wheel was fixed. The dealer never said a word and the couple eventually went away.

 

When you are betting much you could lose much as well, to win 1 piece and leave might be easier but you cannot do it forever, this is not long term solution.
Only gamblers inexperienced, short-shighted and in general without an edge consider "hit and run" as a viable gambling solution.

 

So Mark you understand random by observing the matrix board or after results happen?
Don't get me wrong, but your mentality regarding betting sounds like "after Jesus Christ prophet", if you get my drift.
Perhaps programming or/and tutoring would be more suitable and sustainable for your well being, no?

 

No, not really. It doesn't take walking on water to know when a thing is working or not. Just ask the apostle sinking and crying out as Jesus says "yee of little faith" to him.

I can teach people from the point of working or not working recognition in under ten minutes. But I can't teach them randomness characteristics recognition and how their brains are tuned into relating to them at all. I can show them things that happen but it is they that must do all the learning. This is what happens. You show a person a few characteristics and common formations. Then they must learn to see them in my styled charts that are not matrix based. They are column based per individual groupings. You look down them, one at a time, even though they are tightly bundled next to each other. The skill is your recognition capacity utilizing visual dexterity. Once you see a bunch all at once you must pick the working ones and have reasons to pick one working one over another. That's where thousands of hours of experience comes into play. I'm not stuck seeing the basic formations. My mind is is looking for a bigger picture layer that is also a formation recognition. I know at times a general absence of triples can occur over half or more than halve of all the 6 groupings all at the same times. This is seeing the bigger picture. I can't teach someone to see the basic formations and the deeper layer formations. They must become skilled at seeing deeper into the live playing charts on their own.

I'm only interested in the what is happening right now, what happened on the last bet, and the results of the next spin. It's like reading music charts. It's even more like ski racing in the downhill. I know what I'm doing while on course in the actual turn that I'm executing but I'm also down the hill in my mind setting up what the turn I'm in now exits best to use the shortest highest line entering the next turn and the combination of turns after the next turn. That's how you win the race. And you know exactly where most skiers get thrown low on the course because of basic physics. That is where you win the race. You attack to hold the high line and not to get thrown low right where everyone else is getting thrown low. So I'm mindful of that one spot 10 turns ahead also. That is exactly why Lindsey Vonn won so many races. She would stay up taking the high line at the point where everyone else was being taken out low or she would crash trying. She crashed a lot but she also won a lot. That's experience. It matters.

When people try to unpack Reading Randomness with what they think is going on, and obviously they are clueless, I can't make them see my experience and tactical observation skills by just talking to them or down to them. So I never try. The only people worth talking to are those with experience doing this. Everyone else are just walking around casting out demons and claiming to be prophets only to find out that God is going to shit can them for being fake. They are not helping and they are going on record perpetuating misconceptions. Some of them are mean and I love fucking with their heads. Fuck them for being ignorant and opinionated. There is no teaching others that are disproving of RR. There's just hot air and posing as informed. That's how planet earth works. Those that know don't help the suckers that are clueless. "Never give a sucker an even brake." That is rule number one. If that sucker is mean and headed for the cliff, then give him a banana peel to slip on and wish him a happy death. You don't like it? Tough shit. People are going to read this some day and wonder why I put up with so much shit. When they confirm that I was putting up with uninformed people all along the way they will have to decide if they themselves would have done it any other way.

I see you putting up mechanical contraptions the likes of Rube Goldberg and I just say to myself, he's still going through a phase after all these years. Good. When you come here and tell me to do something else because this obviously does not work then I want to make sure you never forget that you came here to get what I think.

So when you tell me to take up a different course of action, I know that you have an uniformed opinion. I don't care. The crowd of unhappy campers is huge. So what. That means there is more for us that get it. That covers the tough shit results and kills everything about life being fair. Merry Christmas.

 

Well said. Very few can see what you’re talking about. It’s the very same reason I got bashed on Reddit. To those type of people wouldn’t waste my energy on them. You shouldn’t either, but if you get a kick out of it then keep on doing it.

My take on R&R is that it’s not a set system where you make fixed bets on the outside. It’s a fluid system that can be applied to all types of systems. Whether you’re an inside or outside player this can apply to both players.
It’s true when you say you can’t teach skill. Skill is acquired through knowledge, practice, and discipline.

 

I learned more on R&R through your comments on other threads. Your R&R thread pretty much got hijacked by the naysayers so that thread is pretty much useless at this point and only gonna learn about you defending that thread.
Maybe start a part 2 and hope for no interruption

 

I like it just the way that it is. Everyone that has worked on learning the skills has said that they filter out the interruptions and just focus on the content and the skills. It sort of protects itself too. Let's call it the cost of learning. I'm charging a fee after all. People must put up with clueless posers polishing their capes and flashing naked on their soapboxes. These are the comedians of doom. And they are confirmed as unskilled too. Why should any thread at this forum go unscathed? After all is said there are only 37 slots on a European Wheel and you are a fucking idiot if you don't kiss Snowman's ass. He's the asshole that destroyed Gambler's Glen and he would do the same here if he was given the power to cancel this one too.

 

This sentence is only what worth keeping, everything is becoming, you cunt go forth by looking back.

 

My English is terribly bad ... I understand all wrong.