1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette Red/Black Pattern Betting

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by David Gregory, Sep 14, 2019.

  1. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Is "him" someone discussing things in this thread.

    I got students so that I could get research data. Funny how that works. I abandoned double dozens, deep holes caused by waiting for monster sized trends, and very long 8 to 10 hours marathon sessions at live tables. I gave up all that 2 years ago when someone here posted a video about stock trading like a casino. That was it for me right then. I found what I was searching for. I validated it with one student. I confirmed that I know how to teach this. I kept most of the fine details a secret. So for 14 years I have been on these forums suggesting reading randomness. Nobody has raved at all. You are right. But on July 20th of this year I did what I have never done before. I decided after good advice and logical consideration to publish everything new. I provided all the software support, all the skills to be learned, and the tactics that reflect the logic found in that stock trading video that I considered of value. So it's been nine weeks and all I get is "where's the proof?" It's coming. Just make sure that you are the last one in line to consider it, just about the time that it is too late, please.

    Who knows who is looking at this. It's not like I'm trying to ask for your blood or your first born. I published what I know is a Holy Grail. I don't care who rejects it now. They will be dragged to the realization at some point. These forums are full of skepticism. It's natural to suspect everything. That is why it will leak out slowly.
     
    mansi19896 likes this.
  2. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Everyone trained has won and improved on the expectation. I'm still looking for someone that is struggling.

    Reading Randomness, found here in this section of the forum.

    https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

    Start from the beginning and try to get past the critics at the first. At the end it gets into the weeds with the trolls. But all is there and all questions are answered. It's impossible for the dickheads to interrupt what has already been published. Ha Ha, dickheads.
     
    mansi19896 likes this.
  3. boyd30

    boyd30 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2019
    Likes:
    2
    Location:
    Sweden
    I will not beg or dislike. I think I will stay neutral to see where this go. There are already clues so you might try for yourself. What warrior said interested me more.
     
  4. David Gregory

    David Gregory Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2019
    Likes:
    172
    Location:
    Ocala, Florida
    That is my point exactly.
     
  5. David Gregory

    David Gregory Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2019
    Likes:
    172
    Location:
    Ocala, Florida
    Perfect observation. So far, other than BSmotron, I have had no one criticize me for any BS statements. Do you guys find it interesting that most everyone on this forum is either a sock puppet, a troll or an idiot other than Gizmo? What conclusion can we draw from that?
     
  6. David Gregory

    David Gregory Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2019
    Likes:
    172
    Location:
    Ocala, Florida
    You say: "In the end it gets into the weeds where the trolls are." Of course, the weeds where the trolls are, are the people who have tried you systems and failed miserably with it. When they post their failures they become tolls because they have proven that your system is no better than anything else out there. Oh, we can't have that you dirty trolls. How dare you publish anything negative about my systems. They are fool proof, they were revealed to me by God Himself.
     
  7. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Boy, you sure do like stepping into your own shit. Show anyone here where the trolls tried this and then it failed. You are nothing but a liar that came here to argue with people. What ever happened to your martingale? You still giving it out to your fake sycophants?

    Show just one troll that tried this and failed. The thread is here. All you have to do is read it. I just massacred you. Everyone that can read can see this. Lying and then getting caught as a liar is not cool. You are uncool. You actually enjoy pretending to be me and then speaking for me. That's fantasizing and projection all in the same illusion. You are funny to watch. keep it up. You are filibustering your own thread. OOps, I told you a truth. Don't want you to get smart.
     

  8. David Gregory

    David Gregory Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2019
    Likes:
    172
    Location:
    Ocala, Florida
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2019
  9. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    David Gregory just wrote in my quote, like a retard:
    You want to figure that out just a little.

    More from the bonehead:
    You can't win 50 units in 100 spins with a Martingale. I do expect you to at least prove that wild ass claim. Half your lost first spins require two or more spins to recover and get that eventual (wished for) win. You only get a small percentage of your wins from first position wins. Those extra spins must be counted. So you never reach 50 in 100 spins. If you are going to lie to people please at least make it a plausible lie.

    People here are not telling you how bad an idea yours is because they are just being charitable to you. We all know that Martingales don't work. If you can make it work then you are in for a lot of attention from the mathematics world. Are you sure you want everyone to know that you don't understand your own claims? Go ahead. Claim your high ground. I'll just treat you with charity from here on. You are amazing. Sorry I ever doubted you. Everyone! This is the Holy Grail of gambling. David Gregory has done it. He deserves a place in the Las Vegas Hall of Fame for Gamblers.
     
  10. Winner

    Winner Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2019
    Likes:
    30
    Location:
    Canada
    Well I can’t speak for this because we don’t no the strategy he’s using, I’m not sure why you are arguing Mr G.
     
  11. Winner

    Winner Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2019
    Likes:
    30
    Location:
    Canada
    There was a guy years ago he called the shoeshine boy had similar concept that David is taking about but David might be doing something different and has his own twist on it.
     
  12. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Let me answer you this way. Here is the first time David G said something to me in this thread:
    The odds are 1 in 128. I clearly went on to tell him these odds. We studied obfuscation to death on these forums for the past ten years. It's a nice thing to hope for but it does not avoid the sequence of death for progressions. It's just a matter of days, weeks, or months and this will come to an end. Progressions are blind magical, wishful thinking. They always look great until they kill off all your dreams and plans. Go ahead, quit your job and wager the house. You now have your very own personal ATM machine.
     
  13. David Gregory

    David Gregory Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2019
    Likes:
    172
    Location:
    Ocala, Florida
     
  14. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I wrote software just to find out. So my sim operates on 20,0000 spins. It stops on losses. It includes telemetry for each session. Guess what smarty pants? It does just average 50 wins for each 102 spin session. But it loses all the time as I expected. It only reaches the average of 50 if you run the thing at full number of spins per session of 102 spins per session if it wins. In other words it must reach 60 times in some instances in order to average 50. You say you stop on 50 so that 50 average must be lower. It's a monumental loser. Your tricks don't actually work that are described in your comment on page one, message 8. Obfuscation never makes an improvement.

    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 55
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 82
    the running total is -- 46
    the running total is -- 51
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 10
    the running total is -- 58
    the running total is -- 43
    the running total is -- 45
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 37
    the running total is -- 45
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 69
    the running total is -- 56
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 101
    the running total is -- 45
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 52
    the running total is -- 46
    the running total is -- 54
    the running total is -- 55
    the running total is -- 56
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 42
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 57
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 10
    the running total is -- 53
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 30
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 16
    the running total is -- 49
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 13
    the running total is -- 55
    the running total is -- 49
    the running total is -- 45
    the running total is -- 47
    the running total is -- 55
    the running total is -- 44
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 76
    the running total is -- 52
    the running total is -- 44
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 17
    the running total is -- 45
    the running total is -- 52
    the running total is -- 49
    the running total is -- 51
    the running total is -- 41
    the running total is -- 53
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 40
    the running total is -- 64
    the running total is -- 60
    the running total is -- 57
    the running total is -- 55
    the running total is -- 47
    the running total is -- 47
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 36
    the running total is -- 50
    the running total is -- 55
    the running total is -- 40
    the running total is -- 53
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 19
    the running total is -- 55
    the running total is -- 48
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 65
    the running total is -- 52
    the running total is -- 57
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 30
    the running total is -- 53
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 69
    the running total is -- 43
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 25
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 101
    the running total is -- 53
    the running total is -- 55
    the running total is -- 52
    the running total is -- 55
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 42
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 82
    the running total is -- 51
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 22
    the running total is -- 56
    the running total is -- 52
    the running total is -- 50
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 87
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 19
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 98
    the running total is -- 51
    the running total is -- 50
    the running total is -- 51
    the running total is -- 59
    the running total is -- 50
    the running total is -- 56
    the running total is -- 53
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 73
    the running total is -- 56
    the running total is -- 55
    the running total is -- 58
    the running total is -- 52
    the running total is -- 60
    the running total is -- 50
    the running total is -- 50
    the running total is -- 48
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 32
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 41
    the running total is -- 53
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 25
    the running total is -- 54
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 58
    the running total is -- 48
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 67
    the running total is -- 58
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 55
    the running total is -- 42
    the running total is -- 50
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 86
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 91
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 103
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 60
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 20
    the running total is -- 48
    the running total is -- 57
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 99
    the running total is -- 49
    the running total is -- 50
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 30
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 82
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 18
    the running total is -- 57
    the running total is -- 45
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 93
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 96
    the running total is -- 45
    the running total is -- 49
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 41
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 85
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 45
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 14
    the running total is -- 50
    the running total is -- 38
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 73
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 94
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 8
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 70
    the running total is -- 57
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 63
    the running total is -- 52
    the running total is -- 53
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 30
    the running total is -- 47
    the running total is -- 47
    the running total is -- 60
    the running total is -- 49
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 8
    the running total is -- 54
    the running total is -- 52
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 36
    the running total is -- 45
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 53
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 10
    the running total is -- 53
    the running total is -- 53
    the running total is -- 43
    the running total is -- 54
    the running total is -- 48
    the running total is -- 45
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 76
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 80
    the running total is -- 47
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 97
    the running total is -- 56
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 92
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 52
    the running total is -- 53
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 73
    the running total is -- 54
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 46
    the running total is -- 49
    the running total is -- 57
    the running total is -- 40
    the running total is -- 50
    the running total is -- 53
    the running total is -- 56
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 85
    the running total is -- 55
    the running total is -- 44
    the running total is -- 54
    the running total is -- 45
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 8
    the running total is -- 54
    the running total is -- 52
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 24
    the running total is -- 47
    the running total is -- 42
    the running total is -- 50
    the running total is -- 55
    the running total is -- 47
    the running total is -- 48
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 51
    the running total is -- 47
    the running total is -- 46
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 9
    the running total is -- 54
    the running total is -- 45
    the running total is -- 55
    -- you lost your full bankroll at spin -- 15

    Lost number of bankrolls in 20,000 spins -- 74
    Average wins per winning session is -- 50.81746
    Number of sessions won -- 126
    Total lost equals -3069
     

  15. David Gregory

    David Gregory Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2019
    Likes:
    172
    Location:
    Ocala, Florida
    Damn, what a waste of time. That test must have been for one of your your strategies, not mine. There is no possible way you can run a test on my strategy because you don't have a clue how it is actually played. I see what you have done and it soooo far off. And furthermore, you could not possibly test my strategy with a any type of software because there are moves that are made depending on various circumstances in which a computer could not make such judgments. I will tell you this one more time because I am getting tired of repeating myself with you, and you not listening. So far I have played a total of 205 games. Out of those I have won 175. I have lost 30. I have a net profit of 5,216 units. I play to a win of 50 units every game, no more, no less. I have played a total of 20,225 spins, which calculates to an average of 98 spins per game. So there Mr. Smarty Pants, get your software to duplicate that data and you have my exact strategy. Until then, you have nothing intelligent you can talk to me about my strategy. Can you hear me now?
     
  16. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    OK, I'll leave you all with this common sense warning. This guy is using a seven step Martingale and says he is a winner. Nothing more needs to be said. Don't fall for this common newbie error. He won't change his tune until it all blows up in his face.

    You can prove to yourself if his methods work by playing it against real online spins at no cost or risk to you. That is the best advice out there. Goodbye David. Enjoy it.
     
  17. David Gregory

    David Gregory Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2019
    Likes:
    172
    Location:
    Ocala, Florida
    Mr. Gizmotron, Your common sense warning to all is actually very good advice. However, no one can prove to them selves if my strategy works or not because no one knows how to play the exact strategy. I have tested it against real online spins found on Youtube and got the same results. Too slow however. I have studied just about every thing out there regarding odds and probabilities. I understand all of that, and do not disagree with the mathematical data. There is not a single serious person in the gambling world I have found who would ever consider using a Martingale progression. And according to all research and data over the centuries, every system and strategy of play will fail eventually. What I mean by fail is you will eventually loose your entire bankroll. The mathematical data does not exclude you either. No matter what you have or will come up with in the future, it too will fail. 1+1+1+ 2=5. Mathematically, no matter how you manipulate those numbers, added together they will always equal 5. This all applies to my strategy also. I have never, ever claimed I have a strategy that will defeat probabilities. I have only claimed that so far, let me repeat that (so far) I have had outstanding results. Substantially better than anything else I have ever tried. You keep coming back at me and repeating and repeating and repeating it can't work, it will fail. Have I ever disagreed with you on that point. No! I just keep showing you my results SO FAR. What is your argument exactly? The one thing you have never considered about my results to date is that I may be just extremely lucky. Can you argue with that? Is there mathematical data on luck? I f I should stop at this point playing my strategy, I am way ahead of the probabilities. But if I continue to play, yes, of course it will blow up in my face. However, according to one of the rules of my strategy, I cannot loose from this point forward. The rule states, that once you lose your initial bankroll, game over for good. I have won 52,660.00 to date. If I continue to play and loose my initial bankroll of 3,840.00 I am ahead by 48,820.00. If I continue to play after losing my initial bankroll, that would be contrary to my own rules. If I did continue to playing after loosening my initial bankroll, this would be the only time you would be justified calling me stupid, because you would be absolutely right. But I am not stupid.
     
  18. Winner

    Winner Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2019
    Likes:
    30
    Location:
    Canada
    There is nothing else to be said then on this thread ,because there’s is nothing for people to try if there’s nothing posted .
     
  19. soxfan

    soxfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Likes:
    818
    Location:
    FrozenTundra
    Bwwwwwwwaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh the nutjob, coconut, bottom feeder, scammer p.o.s gizmotron declare the David Gregory roulettes style a loser even though he don't know the detail of the method, hey hey!
     
  20. frankg1974

    frankg1974 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2019
    Likes:
    49
    Location:
    NY
    Majority of the people at this forum have lost lot of money playing roulette.So if you disagree with them they become rude and obnoxious,especially the founder members who do not understand roulette well and talk about silly systems.
     

Share This Page