1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play sub-forum.
    Dismiss Notice

Baccarat Repeat 6 System

Discussion in 'Baccarat Forum' started by fathead, Oct 18, 2021.

  1. Bactz

    Bactz Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2021
    Likes:
    9
    Location:
    Australia
    Hang on, I just read the comments by Jane and Rina's regarding 600 units...
     
  2. Bactz

    Bactz Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2021
    Likes:
    9
    Location:
    Australia
    Sorry Jae and Rinad, my autocorrect function adjusted the spelling above
     
  3. fathead

    fathead Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2018
    Likes:
    165
    Location:
    USA
    Whatever base unit you choose. If you decided to use $10 as your base then you would need $10,000 for the Grand Martingale and would have made $19,482.00 over the course of the test.
     
  4. fathead

    fathead Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2018
    Likes:
    165
    Location:
    USA
    No, I did not try any other types of recovery progressions. 600 times your base bet for regular martingale, and 1000 times base bet for grand martingale.
     
  5. TLF

    TLF New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Likes:
    4
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Have you tried also incorporating the inverse? Meaning the first two of 6 to be opposite, then trying to catch one of the next 4 to match. I'm curious if the occurrences on its own would be of similar results, worse, or better. If similar, as I'd expect, would it help recover and increase the unit profit a bit or just sink the ship? How many sets of 6 total opposites in your results?
     
  6. Mako

    Mako Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2018
    Likes:
    429
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    It won’t make a difference. Betting any permutation to appear, or not appear, has been done to death, tested infinity, and does not work. They all produce similar losing charts to what fathead has posted.

    If you want to keep it simple, you’re better off playing as soxfan or craps does, or playing fathead’s banker after PPPP method.
     
  7. fathead

    fathead Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2018
    Likes:
    165
    Location:
    USA
    Yes, I tried that. It lost pretty badly. The sequence that I posted is the only one that does well. They system made about 46,000 bets or about 11 bets per shoe.
     

  8. fathead

    fathead Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2018
    Likes:
    165
    Location:
    USA
    The two charts that I posted for this method were actually winning ones (see page #1). I find this interesting since this system is at least a few years old. The developer did not have access to most of my data and could not have optimized to my data.
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2021
    Mako likes this.
  9. Mako

    Mako Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2018
    Likes:
    429
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    Sorry, I meant Gregory’s permutation method from the other thread.
     
    fathead likes this.
  10. Bactz

    Bactz Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2021
    Likes:
    9
    Location:
    Australia
    Fathead, how do you manage to bet 11 bets per shoe? As you mentioned on page 1...I have briefly done about 2 shoes with my records, and I can only get to 3 or 4 bets with the set conditions in place!
    Do you back-track to locate triggers? Considering the short amount of time allowed to place bets, something doesn't quite add up.

    However, unless I need to track more shoes to get a larger sample size? What is your take on it?
     
  11. fathead

    fathead Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2018
    Likes:
    165
    Location:
    USA
    Yes, after you win one unit or lose 15 units, look immediately at the last 8 decisions to see if there is a new trigger. In the example below, the first 8 decision trigger is bold uppercase. The second 8 decision trigger happens immediately after the 15 unit loss and is bold lowercase.

    P P P P p p P P P P p p P P P B

    The 11 bets includes each step of the martingale. In the above example if you bet 1, 2, 4, 8 and lost 15 units then bet 1, 2, 4, 8 and won 1 unit on the fourth bet you have made a total of 8 bets.
     
  12. CarloDarlo

    CarloDarlo Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2018
    Likes:
    73
    Occupation:
    Professional Gambler
    Location:
    Sin City
    People finally catching onto this style of play.

    I've used something similar to the sequence posted. But instead of a rolling sequence throughout. I used a fixed sequences throughout the shoe and mix them up going into a new shoe.

    Say you waited the first 8 outcomes for shoe #1. Next shoe I would apply a shift of say 2 and wait for the next 10.

    Also tried fixed templates based on previous shoe results. Versus applying a shift. No matter how you dice it. The goal is the same minimize or attempt to minimize the losses in a row.

    Its incredibly difficult for a shoe to keep mirroring in on itself. Which is the work of diminishing probabilities anyway.
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2021
    fathead likes this.
  13. Rinad

    Rinad Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2020
    Likes:
    120
    Location:
    colorado
    CarloDarlo what type of bankroll do you see fit playing that way and do you find it helpful playing higher progressions during recovery ?
    thx,
    Rinad
     

Share This Page