Roulette Repeats within 37/38 spins

Funny story,

Back in 2005 to about 2008 The Venetian had a whole bunch of Paulson Roulette Wheels. On some of the wheels many of the red inserts had been replaced, but not the black inserts. When the ball bounced on many of the new inserts the bounce was deadened. It actually created a bias for red on some of the wheels. It was insane at the time. Later in late 2009 they replaced all of the wheels with Starburst Huxleys, and then again a few years later with Cammeghs.

 

AHA! I didn't expect you to respond that!
As a matter of fact I do need a programmer, are you offering me your services?

 

Blue,

I have amazing simulators. But I am not the programmer. A brilliant programming friend of mine built some of them, and another friend built others. If you want to we can run sims on Skype screen share. You don't need a camera or mic, you just type like you do here, but you'll be able to see the simulator in action on my screen if you want to run stuff.

 

I need programs, not just simulations.

 

Blue,

My simulators will already simulate anything you can imagine. You just dictate the parameters.

 

Thanks for the offer. I think it's great that you can do research. I've done all that I care too. You are dead on right about probability. It's a validation that there is a House Advantage Fallacy. I wonder if you will get that far?

 

That's brilliant and it is true. You know a fact about the characteristics of randomness. There is no such thing as a hot EC. There can be a pattern of hits, a swarm of singles, doubles, triples, an absence of one side for a good stretch. These things come and go and are surrounded by chaos. They all reflect a kind of balance in the long run, including the greens. That's why you can never predict what they will do. All you can do is guess. But you can swerve into a patch of good guesses. If I'm hunting the best 2 to 4 hottest numbers I don't care much about how many spins it takes. But with EC's I must keep track of balance. And it's easy and real fast to do that. It's quick to see the conditions. That is the only reason I like it. In the end all I care about is getting paid. Double dozens took too long to balance out. Nine numbers would take too long also.

 

What does this suppose to mean??

 

What is the perfect partner for pair number 1?

 

I'm with BlueAngel it's a bit vague at the moment, but will try:

8 32 34 36

 

Blue,

What's a perfect pair? Are you trying to find numbers that tend to hit just before or just after other numbers? If you are I can show you faster way of doing it in your data without the use of any special programs. It simply involves using the sort/filter function in Excel.

 

This is what I need to do !

 

Betjack,

Do you have Excel?

 

of course

 

Do you have Skype? If so then I can walk you through it on a screen share. If not I can try and explain it here.

 

Send me P M with your skype I will find you. I CAnnot send PM here.. :-(

 

Glad to see you are programming.

check this out in Xtalk language:

Code:

on mouseUp
  put "1,34,17,5,22,23,36." into yessareeBobCatTail
  sort items of yessareeBobCatTail ascending numeric
  put yessareeBobCatTail into ohHellYes -- result = "1,5,17,22,23,34,36,"
end MouseUp

 

Ha! I'm definitely not a programmer. I can put some simple formulas in Excel and do some very remedial stuff, but that's basically it.
However my son is deep into it and is studying to be a software engineer.

The simulators that I have were actually built by a couple of well respected friends of mine. Not me. I put forth some suggested ideas that I wanted to see in them, but they did the programming.