Roulette Standard Deviation (2-3) a possible trigger to predict ?

I gathered 10.000 sessions related to single Columns

13 spins are my Start.. Betting 2 and add 2 and remove 2 eldest

Grabb's prediction for Std-2 in 13 spins and columns/dozens

-/- 0 --- +/+ 8-9

2x betting gives 15 spins

Grabb's prediction

-/- 0-1 ----- 9-10

typical std -2 in practice : 0-4-9/0-9-4/4-0-9/4-9-0/9-0-4/9-4-0

23 sessions in my database..

If You bet on 9 it gives the following result:

18 Wins-5 Losses

Betting 50 and 75 euro gives a result of : 1175 euro profit and 78,25%

Will be followed by many more examples

 

Combi : 1-3-9/1-9-3/ etc

85 sessions in my database

a crossing between std-1 and 2

Grabb's prediction for 1 in 13 spins and dozens/columns

-/- 1-2----6-7

15 spins: -/- 2-3---7-8

The question is will it behave as a std-1 or std-2 ?

Outcome: betting 1

55 Wins 30 Losses

Profit 1750 euro Profit and 65%

 

Hello
how to read this
minus -9 minus -4 ; 0
or are just columns

You bet the column that came out in the game at most !!!
with the trend ...
or
You bet the column that came out in the game at least !!!
against the trend.

 

Typical Std-2 Combi : 0-5-8/0-8-5/5-0-8/ etc

You should expect betting the 8.. Just average.. helas

It's the 5... not a contradiction

41 sessions... 31 winning

76% Prob and 1850 euro Profit

 

Combi ; 3-3-7/3-7-3/7-3-3

Low part is Balanced / 3-5 columns

High Part Std-1 / 6-7 columns

442 Sessions... Betting the first 3 is the trend

60% and 4150 euro Profit

 

Combi / '1-4-7/1-7-4/ etc

129 sessions

Classical St-dev-1

The Trend betting the 4

63% and 2100 euro Profit

 

Combi of '0'-4-8/0-8-4/etc

14 sessions

Betting the zero

71.50 % 500 euro Profit

 

Combi of '0-6-6/6-0-6/6-6-0/

13 sessions 84.5% and 850 euro Profit

Betting the zero

 

Combi of 0-5-8/0-8-5/ etc

41 sessions betting the 5

75.5% and 1850 euro of Profit

 

Rheti,

You've still fallen back into the box that is the gambler's fallacy. What you're doing won't work and for obvious reasons.

Free your mind, escape the trap. Read more on the history of the game and you'll find a real way to beat the wheel.

 

"Random has limits"

This is a fact that can't be disputed, regardless of Sir Anyone's "opinion".

 

If you try to read 50 spins as some kind of phase of SD then you will miss all the opportunities. Roulette does not conform to a set of mathematical boundaries while it goes thru changes. You must see the changes and react to them while they occur. Sometimes they will all end just as you see them and sometimes they will continue a little after you see them. You must learn how to live with those conditions. You can't do that while trying to see some SD standard. Play loose. See the hot spots and bet bigger. See the cold spots and bet smaller or not at all. Make that an acquired skill. Just take it as it comes.

 

Oh really? Care to explain?

I didn't think so.

 

Thanks

 

It's already been explained.

 

its much more simple to beat roulette than using any standard deviation ......

 

Rhetti, you shouldn't use that as a trigger... Just look on differents 10K spins sample, you'll have those kind of SD for numbers as well and of course it doesn't mean anything for the future.

Actually what you see is an expression of randomness on a sample, what is allready more interesting is to use those data as a reference of what you seen and confirm it on another sample.

 

"Random has limits"

Is that really true ?

In the 10.000 sessions of Columns, i had 1 session of 15 spins, and 13 columns (C2), that's SD-4, so beyond the 99.7%
Ok I will never face it.. But quite sure still possible 14 and 15 Columns in 15 spins, SD-5