Baccarat The Final Solution

yes it can be a bumpy road. I messed around with a few shoes today they did okay until
B 2412213213321221321411111231421233

Using the variance betting twice in the series I'm counting 11 triplets. If wants to play it out and cross-check it please do

And no I didn't play real I played it virtual watching the hands go by. Pretty glad of that.

 

Sputnik, sorry for a stupid question but is 1-1.5-2-2.5-3-4 a negative or positive progression? It's helped me a lot Thanks for sharing this way of playing. Its helped me a lot.

 

currently i’m toying with a slightly modif. Holloway’s prog
start at 1 but switch after a L to a Holloway base 2.
so: 1 22222 3333 or 0.5 11111 2222
1-2 is important to get profit with LW

 

I love the selection process that catches at least one repeat among three events.
If I describe the algorithm with words is like catching chops of bias and sometimes we struggle (variance).

Personally, I struggle with the staking plan and still testing different solutions.

Cheers

 

Judge the original is 1 2 4 6 8 12 and winning twice within six attempts.
I add the option to regress - but notice is not working starting from the bottom when doing so.

Next, I will make the Fibonacci regression with two steps.

1 1 1 2 3 5 is too soft because the following results is a struggle LL W LL W LW LL LW LL W LW LW LW LL W LL
I need to find something between.

One member sends me an option and I will try it.
If anyone has a suggestion and don't want to post in public - then you are more than welcome to send me a private message.


Cheers

 

Patrik! I stumbled upon this small progression of only 14 units on a line. It suits more to hit-and-run to make 2-5 units than a continuous betting but give it a shot:

112 244 Any time you get a hit on 112, go back to a beginning. Anytime you get a hit on 244, move back to a level #3 which is 2 units and continue a progression. 14 units total. If you lost the last level of 4 units, the session is over.

 

Getting profit under a LW situation is CRUCIAL to win $ with this system.
So the 111 is not recommended, at least from my point of view.
IE: played a nice shoe yesterday: +4 units.
3 LW and 1 W.
if i played 111 i profited 1u only instead of 4.
Got the point?

 

I advocate my MM that it holds under the fire.
You make profits with 1-2, then, if the shoe goes south, you just play in defense, to recover losses and getting out asap.
I worked quite well after ar. 20 shoes I deployed it.

 

I heard a story about NORM from BTC staking 121212 and winning a lot (if my memories re correct)
No matter - I crack it using a positive progression +40 Units staking 121212

 

I like the 12 as well. Just makes more sense to get that unit out on an LW

 

Hello i write from phone ... You missunderstand ... I ride after a win on each bias ... Is a bit more complex

 

I am not familiar with positive progression - but I know I have a very clever solution.
When we win our first or second bet we have at least one repeat out of three possible.
That means we get at least two of the same - if you continue betting the two events you will only face two losses if a sequence busts.
Now if you bet back to back winnings W L W you break even and W W you increase - staking 121 and when up as you win 12 ...
I reckon Norm had to do something like that - we follow the bias and use positive progression.

Back from work and make me a cup of coffee and start RX for simulations.
Two sessions +10 units with positive progression not sure about what the target should be.
Keep the LL LL LL and LL LL W LL LL good indicators to quit.

I believe this is the best I have ever done with Sputnik's March.
So instead of a negative progression and 1K bankroll when visiting my local casino I can bring 200 Euro for two sessions with a 10 minimum each

Cheers

 

This is ridiculous - made two videos +10 units each as the simplest thing in the world.
Don't want to brag - but I am not sharing any more until after this weekend with some live stats.
Maybe I upload the videos later.

Cheers

 

Good luck Patrik! I hope this is the grail you’ve been looking for! Thank you for all of your sharing!

 

I almost understand your idea.
but how you handle 1s? in your bs you don’t bet sets starting with 1.
IE the shoe starts 311- the two base events are 3 and 1 - the bets for the next set are on 1 and 3 and you continue till you get a 2.
then IE you got 132. so the next couple is 32 till a 1 appears. right?
not so clear when you raise the bets:
1-2 when you bet on the couple, ok
maybe after a WW ?
thanks

 

bacproof you are clever Now one punter asks to explore the singles and I solve the puzzle using a very clever solution.
This also involves using John Patrik's chart increasing 122 staking ladder - will post later.

The RNG samples are done as Hit & Run where you play one group and after a loss or win restart fresh with a new group/game.
The reason is that it shall be the same jumping like a butterfly between tables and start betting after the first outcome.

Also important to collect personal permanence where you jump from table and table and wait for a new outcome when starting tracking and betting - so the current board is irrelevant.

See catchment

 

Comparing this to Ellis BB P B PP and betting three times for a three in a row s ridiculous compared with my solution.
Just saying ...

Cheers

 

I will add a regression option with guarantees & excess by JP money management ...
Session bank, loss limit, win target and let the bonus ride until a loss after pocket winnings and not losing it all back.

Ellis MDB is junk compared to this ...

The following is real tactics and optimal solutions.

Cheers

 

Maybe ND can comment on the following regarding JP tactics - looks solid to me ...


200 Euro session bank
Win goal 20% are +40
50 Euro Loss limit of 200 Euro session bank (two-session bust 100 Euro)
10 20 20 Euro Stacking


Reach win target +40 pocket +20 and keep 200 Euro session bank
and let the other +20 ride until a loss (the excess) and grab what’s left.
If you strike you pocket half the money until the strike ends and grab was left.

So each time +20 ride and we pocket half +10 we also make one passive +10 besides the +20 we staking.
You will see that below.

Nothing is written in stone - but i like this as guide lines to tackle the 122

Session 1

+10

+10

-10

+10

+10

+10 … (+40) Win target (pocket +20 and 50 session bank) and let it ride +20

+20 … (pocket +10) Current balance +30 and let +20 ride

+20 … (pocket +10) Current balance +40 and let +20 ride

+20 … (pocket +10( Current balance +50 and let +20 ride

-20 … Summary +60 & +20 = +80 Euro


Session 2


+10

+10

+10

+10 (+40 win target (pocket +20 and 50 session bank) and let it ride +20

-20 (pocket +20) current balance +100


Session 3


+10

-40 (stop loss limit) current balance +60


Session 4


+10

+10

-10

+10

+10

+10 +40 win target (pocket +20 and 50 session bank) and let ir ride +20

-20 (pocket +20) Current balance +80


Session 5


+10

+10

-10

+10

+10

+10 … +40 win target (pocket +20 and 50 session bank) and let it ride +20

+20 (pocket +10 and have +30 and ride +20 again

+20 (pocket +10 and have +40 and ride +20 again

+20 (pocket +10 and have +50 and ride +20 again

+20 (pocket +10 and have +60 and ride +20 again

-20 (pocket +40 and passive winnings +40 = +80 current balance 160 Euro

 

I will make another PDF with Brett Morton Fund Management as a tactical tool for the selection.

Cheers