Baccarat The Final Solution

this variant is “on rolling basis” or you play dividing the permanence in sets of 3?

 

if i play it correctly 233 is a LW, right?

A

 

Sets of three
Yes you bet is correct

Cheers

 

The first sample with four losses after around 10 Shoes.
We can also use this to play on a rolling basis - but I have not solved the Hold Bet Option yet wish would be nessary.

321 LL
311 W
311 W
322 LW
311 W
312 LL
211 W
221 W
322 LW
311 W
221 W
313 LW
312 LL
323 LW
331 W
321 LL
211 W
313 LW
211 W
311 W
211 W
212 LW
221 W
231 LL
211 W
211 W
321 LL
322 LW
212 LW
223 W
311 W
311 W
331 W
323 LW
233 LW
312 LL
211 W
312 LL
331 W
311 W
223 W
313 LW
321 LL
321 LL
222 W
231 LL
211 W
321 LL

 

This is my personal Holy Grail - is just amazing - I test betting on a rolling basis and is just awesome -
Flat betting.

 

I see. Thanks. I'll check it out live a little bit later. Mice staking Plan should overcome any problems.

 

Hello - I will mention that some charts have a bumpy ride - so in real life a progression would be necessary.

 

The bumpy chart above is testing connect the sets of three - still have to develop and experiemnt.
But the sets of three and betting for one repeat is awesome.
Another four RNG shoes with one four losses.

I have never seen anything so stable with so tight LW-Registry using Sputnik's March Concept.
Around 14 shoes with four losses twice (awesome)

312 LL
211 W
323 LW
312 LL
332 W
312 LL
311 W
311 W
211 W
221 W
221 W
312 LL
311 W
233 LW
213 LL
333 W
311 W
322 LW
322 LW
233 LW
332 W
233 LW
311 W
331 W
211 W
311 W
331 W
311 W
312 LL
221 W
311 W
221 W
323 LW
233 LW
223 W
311 W
211 W
323 LW
233 LW
323 LW
333 W
233 LW
211 W
313 LW
312 LL
231 LL
333 W
323 LW

 

Try to find some bad results with no luck - the sample below has four losses three times - I feel very confident with this variant.
Maybe I should make a video using a delayed Fibonacci

313 LW
221 W
213 LL
212 LW
312 LL
332 W
311 W
331 W
221 W
233 LW
233 LW
331 W
221 W
321 LL
231 LL
223 W
213 LL
233 LW
231 LL
312 LL
233 LW
212 LW
312 LL
311 W
322 LW
333 W
323 LW
333 W
223 W
231 LL
231 LL
311 W
312 LL
311 W
321 LL
323 LW
232 LW
332 W
232 LW
212 LW
322 LW
232 LW
222 W
212 LW
211 W
232 LW
321 LL
331 W

 

This video might help those having a hard time understanding the algorithm (March)

 

Agree with Sputnik
I play this bs for real now. 26 shoes live + 50 tested.
I exit the shoe after LLLL because this means that it’s out of sync with my bs.
Mathematically it has no clue but practically i don’t want be involved in shoes from hell.
Still working on MM to exploit it at best.
A

 

bacproof - I will mention what I experiment with - winning twice with six or eight events.
For example, if you take 1 1 1 2 3 5 and have no luck and win the first and last you are only down -1 unit.
And the strike ratio will make that kind of loss vanish.

Now I think four levels with delayed Fibonacci winning twice.
Let's say you don't get an early win and regress back two steps when winning.
Then your staking gets two extra attempts to recoup - so six attempts become eight and eight attempts become ten.

I am testing and developing the solution as I speak - but I will give one example.
The example below is six attempts - just a short illustration.

313 LW 11
221 W 1
213 LL 11
212 LW 12
312 LL 11
332 W 1
311 W 1
331 W 1
221 W 1
233 LW 11
233 LW 11
331 W 1
221 W 1
321 LL 11
231 LL 12
223 W 3
213 LL 12
233 LW 35
231 LL 11
312 LL 12
233 LW 35
212 LW 12
312 LL 11
311 W 1
322 LW 11
333 W 1
323 LW 11
333 W 1
223 W 1
231 LL 11
231 LL 12
311 W 3
312 LL 12
311 W 3

 

One more way to explore the losses.
Bet one attack after one fictive win - then a losing string would look like this -
W LL W LL W LL W LL W LL where wins is favouring us to come in chops
Another is four back to back LL LL W LL LL maybe a triplet back to back LL LL W LL LL W LL LL depending on staking.

Just a part of a brainstorm

Cheers

 

Getting closer to my personal solution - The plan for this coming weekend at my local casino.

I considering staking 1 1 1 2 3 5 wins twice and regressing two-step after the first win.
The total is 13 units (130 Euro) win target 6 units (60 Euro) then regress and split the units by half.
The minimum on tables are 10 Euro (even money) and if I reach my target I will play 5 Euro (Units) on Air Ball Machine.

If I bust against - LL LL LL - or - LL LL W LL LL - I will move up one level (recovery) 2 2 2 4 6 10
Win target 12 units - half of total 26 units and recover the first staking level of 13 Units.

If I bust again I will accept a loss and wager the last third level of 4 4 4 8 12 20
Winning half the risk 24 units and the total loss of 39 units - total loss (bust) minus 15 units.

The three-level loss not reaching the winning target of half the money at risk 910 Euro

I am conservative - so I might take an easy and relaxing start with two-level and compare RNG stats with real-life stats.

Cheers

 

Around 15 shoes encounter four losses and no one bust first level.

 

I have done some paper betting to become familiar with the staking plan and noticed that after winning four-session +6 units each.
It can become a break-even session that just hovers around +4 -2 +3 -1 and never reaches the +6 unit win target.
It is logical as the staking plan is very conservative and smooth.

Lesson learned with last session (total five)
So I bring this knowledge with me that after 150 trails (around four hours) no win target than settle with even money.
Other options that I mentally bring with me is to cut the winning target of +3 units each session and take a break and then start a new session to complete to win target of +6 units (two-session +3 each) - thinking reaching +3 twice may be easier than reaching +6 at once.

Cheers

 

I found a +4 a good exit point, from my experience, but it depends also on how i’m struggling in that shoe.
easy win, I get my 4u and exit, if it was a difficult one, I take +1 or 2 or whatever to exit asap, also with a small profit.
I noticed that after a +4 often the shoe goes south and it doesn’t worth risking the profit for an additional unit.
Strategy and tactics.
A

 

Nice - I still experimenting with staking plans - the 1 1 1 2 3 5 is to soft -

Cheers

 

always looking for 2 wins in 6 attempts and restart?

 

Yes and we regress after the first win - so the 1 1 1 2 part of the progression is drifting negative when we get winning and loses like this -
LW LL W LW LL W LL LW LL LW LW LL W LL

So I am considering staking

1 Level 1 - 1,5 - 2 - 2.5 - 3 - 4
2 Level 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 8
3 Level 5 - 7.5 - 10 - 12.5 - 15 - 20

Still testing and will play for real this weekend ...
It can also be time-consuming to aim for larger profits - so I considering +2 units x 4 that is half the total risk.
Then split the eight units by half and operate with casino money.

Cheers