Roulette The Global Effect

You guys forget...you are just gambler's, however, I am me.

 

You can always spot me when I'm out >>

 

Steve's ex-customers two years after buying his roulette computer >>

 

lol

 

Come on in to Parx Shanks. Good testing ground mate.

 

But nobody plays constantly for this many spins, so what goods a chart for it? What you mean is you want to see 120 - 200 separate sessions? Why when most are the same graph.

 

I sometimes play 600 at a time.

 

Fossell,

And you've actually seen these 200 separate sessions?

It's only your assumption that all sessions will be successful, but this is based on relatively few sessions already played. What difference does it make whether the session is one long one or broken up into many short ones? Obviously a number of short sessions add up to one long one. The weakness of all systems only becomes obvious when you've played long enough for the house edge to overcome the variance. The fewer numbers you play, the more spins it takes.

 

Yup. Not an assumption. For me not all will be successful. But most are. So thats a win.
And yes theres no difference. Chart will look the same.

 

How many numbers are you betting, on average?

 

Is it a secret how many numbers you're betting? Hey, I'm just trying to help, lol.

 

This is proof that you should never trust a fart.

 

It varies. Whats it got to do with the charts?

 

I guess it must be frustrating for Turbo to read all these posts in roulette forum where everyone want something from him on open or hidden way.
Fact is that Turbo is smart AND he indeed always talks on open way, sometimes even too much open. In all history I was tracking his posts in forums, he NEVER had any bad intentions, just opposite- always wanted to help (for free!!!) to all roulette community. Roulette is more like hobby to him.
I cannot say that this time he acts total opposite as he did in past. Difference is only that this time his approach sounds more like a riddle, and this good one!!

 

It is a great riddle. Have you ever heard that song by John Denver, "Life ain't nothen but a funny funny griddle?"

 

Jefra,

Yes, Turbo just gives and gives and gives until it hurts!

 

I always thought it would be cool to be a monk. The problem is that I can't shut up for long and would just get kicked out

 

And occasionally you have to light yourself on fire but other than that.......

 

The amount of numbers you bet on determines how long it takes before house edge overtakes the variance. If you were betting on 30 numbers a chart of 1000 spins would be more meaningful than if you were betting on one number. The fewer numbers bet, the more spins you need. Even betting 30 numbers a few hundred spins wouldn't be enough, it's essentially meaningless to draw conclusions from such a small sample. You say "it varies"; that's why I asked what is the AVERAGE number of numbers you bet. If I know the average number of numbers bet, I can tell you how many spins are needed in order to give a statistically significant result (assuming there is a profit). It isn't millions of spins, but it's many more than in any of the charts posted.

 

But "Dr.Sir", you must admit that Turbo is very an honest person in comparison with 99,9% of other roulette system inventors who are either selling a "holy shit" or total selfish idiots who do not want to say nothing about their systems. You two are not much different, but are total different with rest of world in good sense!!