Roulette The horse race analogy and set completion

Don't remember how many spins it was, around 70 i think. and i didn't bet that much, was just putting a chip on each number that came to see what and how they perform.

 

Betting like this 3 times a set with 12 numbers will cause the game you play to be much longer, but it's way more accurate in terms of the outcome.

 

I personaly would play only with sets of 6 numbers or higher.

 

But it is constructive. If all is so good as you write - why you still not a millionaire?
Logic is very simple roulette has -2.7% advantage for the player. Now you saw some numbers - what that change ? Still roulete have its advanttage against you in that 2.7 %

 

So to get this straight you bet FOR the number to appear in your process and you made 3 sets (Column Sets) waiting to appear?
Yes I also play with sets of 6 or 9.

 

So you post in a Roulette forum in which people discuss ways to play and make profit from Roulette and you just post that there is no way to beat it?
Alright I'll bite why did you join in the first place and you waste your time answering?
Anyway, thats the end of the line in that short discussion about that matter.

Go figure.
It still amazes me that there are still people like that out there in the Internet(s) in 2019.

 

I want to find that way, but you do what was done many times before. And Dr.Anyone point to the same. If you will read discussions few years old - you will find discussions about the same. But no millionairs! No winners! I met maybe 10 persons from different forums, but I did not meet winners ... only these which I knew before that they are winners, but they play another way - the change mathematical expectation and bet on places which at least in past had a positive expectation.

 

Don't bite! Don't bite! Lol just click on their profile and click "ignore".

 

So that is easy - can ignore all, but what you will got from that ?

If you want talk two or three why then to come to forum - lets talk in skype or in Wats App why you come here ?

 

5 bets placed. all won within 37 spins. this played with the 3 columns as i told.
much longer tracking, but way more accurate.

 

Did you refresh your sets after each won set?
So you played 1 set per 37 spins give or take

 

after i had one contender, i start to play that number. then once i start betting the contender i start tracking all over again.
So far in these 5 sessions, i played only 1 number from the max of 4 turbo played. this because of the large sets that needs to be tracked. Again, this ain't something special, don't know if i do it right or not, just testing.

 

My experience if played the way you just described is trully bitter.
One column had one number and slept for around 39 or more spins - and even if another came I was already in negative territory.
Both times cold numbers in each set..

But still it doesnt make sense.
You're just waiting one unhit or 2 or 3 max tha could chew your BR if they sleep.

Generally speaking we're looking it from the wrong angle.
Sets of the kind we're testing dont make sense.
Why on earth would a set (even if its a wheel sector - unless the wheel is biased or the dealer is biased) would become hot?

I think we need to draw our attention on the ratio of each Unhit-Unique-Repeat at each stage of the 37 spin cycles.

 

Also in the example Turbo gave the line sure can appear at each test 6.3 per average, but as a line.
Not every number inside that number..That is an assumption but not the fact itself.

You could have at Repeats alongside with some Unhit and still the Line is covered (but NOT all the numbers included in the line).

 

What's needed to upload a file? get no extension

 

Ok my 2 cents.

This whole theory is a more refined (aesthecally-wise with the use of real examples) of the Minimum Interval Strategy - which I suspected from the first posts when I mentioned the appearance gap.

Google is your friend.
Search it.

I havent been able to find the whole strategy published somewhere (Gamblers Glen had it but its down) but I found some bits where TG is also using LINES as examples to define Min Interval.

Am I close Turbogenious?

 

I was literally searching for the min interval strat about 30 minutes ago lol.. tried using the internet way back machine but it wouldn't work..

 

Aye there is definitely something into it if you manage to analyse the data correctly and make decisions upon them.
Difficult since I dont know the *exact* rules if there were any but still...
Betting 6 numbers coming down to 4 numbers.



Unless we hit something, it may be blind luck.

 

Care to elaborate?

 

Well I use RX to see the stats of min intervals of lines and corners.
I combine them by gut (this is the unknown factor) where I find a happy medium where the min interval is high enough and the max interval not very high in both Corners and Lines (sometimes they overlap).

I would like to combine the number interval as well but unless I have some set of rules (which I dont) , this would be too much for a human brain to process in a matter of seconds and also make decisions upon them.
So unless Turbo is kind enough to give us the strategy on intervals (or anyway his take on them) I cant elaborate.

I suggest you go test on RX.
Get those stat numbers in your head and feel it on fire