Roulette The WHOLE truth and nothing but the truth!

Many years have passed since the foundation of the game and still people around the world are in their individual quest for discovering the holy grail.
We have to ask ourselves; Is it realistic expectation or is it vanity??

What exactly do you expect to find and what is the definition of reality for you?
Along the long path of history knowledge has been evolved, thus perception has been shaped accordingly.

When perception changes, your reality is changing..."the world you be is the world you see..."
By understanding a partial reality, I'm not influencing the whole of what is real, nor any of its parts, what I actually change is my angle of perception, in other words the level of my consciousness/awareness.

While no single existing system has perpetually succeed to cease all of the so-called "loopholes", each one of all those "loopholes" has been blocked by at least one system.
Thus, by maintaining a two dimensional mentality in a three dimensional world, you are framing yourself.
The champions of mainstream theory support that each and every result is independent.
Probably you have heard: "roulette has no memory" and every time I recall it I laugh very hard!

So,if you ask me, I'd respond that there is correlation between outcomes and this does NOT have to do with MEMORY!
So who's right and who's wrong??
My answer is EVERYONE and NO ONE!

Everyone partially, up to a certain extend, BUT no one as a WHOLE!
In my point of view, no one can comprehend the COMPLETE "picture" because it's too big and regarding your approach you see ONLY a different part of the WHOLE.
If we were to interpret this generic theory in roulette terms, one could not satisfy all parameters with a single method.

Like the Greek ancient philosopher Heraclitos once said: "The only constant (in universe) is evolution (change).
So when some see only randomness in action, I see the chain reactions unfolding before my eyes...
I hope to contribute for a greater degree of understanding the events/facts.

 

I don't believe in luck, I believe in opportunities and life is full of them...
Allow me to give my own definition about luck;
Luck is when the good preparation meets the proper opportunity...! Seneca

Just think about it for a minute,what we call "luck"?
Isn't it the circumstances which are playing a very important role in our lives?

Circumstances may allow or may not to achieve what you deserve...so if the half part is to be ready till the opportunity arises, the rest is the circumstance, chance, opportunity or whatever you want to call it.
And I'm not talking only about gambling...in a way, life is a big gamble.
The way I think casinos is certainly NOT my enemy, but an enterprise which is giving me the chance to claim what I deserve.

When I'm winning, I'm not receiving the casinos money but other gambler's money.
The casino is just a mediator, an arbitrary authority to provide a nice,comfortable venue and because of their expenses (salaries, taxes, security, service...etc) have to acquire a percentage of the total action,which I found very reasonable.
In gamble like in life many people want, have desires but very few can achieve what they really want, the rest just compromise with their circumstances...

Some say gambling is a big problem because of the addiction, I say gambling is NOT necessarily a problem, BUT lack of moderation IS the problem and as a matter of fact, lack of moderation is problem for EVERY asset of life!
Even "harmless" things like watching TV and eating could be proved FATAL with lack of moderation!
If you ask me why I gamble, I would respond: It's the sense of independence, freedom, the sense of achievement and success through something NOT ordinary, nor easy.

My mentality receives difficulty as a really good challenge,an opportunity to achieve what very few can.
I'm also positive person from nature, when others say impossible, I say "why not...let's give it a try!"
In time,my experience became the equalizer of my positiveness and my realism and that's the KEY, BALANCE!
This is my approach in gambling, but I really do understand when others consider gambling as social disease and gamblers as lepers...

It's the same people who are considering money as the source of all evils!
Money is NOT evil, some people are...money has no will of its own, people have and some of them are willing to kill, steal, blackmail and deceive in order to gain it.
So who is the evil after all,the money or some people?!

Guns don't kill,people do...but it's always is easier to find a "skip goat" than to face reality!
Gambling is not a disease but it could be many different things for different people...
perhaps for some could be their way to realize their dreams and deepest desires.
While for some others could be a disaster...both statements could be true!!
You might wonder, how could two extremely different statements could be true?

The answer is in the notion: "The world you see is the world you be..."
In other words if you believe that something is negative, then it'll be for YOU because you believe so!
Our beliefs forming our reality, faith is not to demand proof as a way to believe, but quite the opposite...
first you believe, believe in yourself and what you can do and then, and ONLY then, you can see the results!

 

Since the creation of the roulette wheel and the foundation of roulette game,knowledge around gambling has been evolved.This is a fact which is hard to deny.

However the rules of the game remain the same as used to be approximately more than 1 and a half century ago.
This leads to the conclusion that if something remains static,while the opposite side progressing,that eventually will overcome the static side.

If my conclusion is true,then why the majority of roulette gamblers cannot overcome the HE in order to become overall/long term winners?

This is an accurate objection, however there is an answer.
For all the long term losers there must be a common element which they share in order to be,all of them,in the negative side.
You might wonder what could it be?
So many different people are using a lot of different approaches to the game,so how could be even 1 mutual element among them?
The answer is quite simple,perhaps they are using different strategies,methods,systems,money managements,but there is however 1 single mistake which is the same for all of them!

What is it,can you think of something?
There are systems/methods which are more conservative,persistent than others and another category which includes the more aggressive and less stable systems/methods.

I'm not advocating either side,the first would gain less profit more times and it's going to lose more money less times,while the second will gain more profit less times and it's going to lose less money more times.
In this generalization both of the approaches seems equal in the end,but there is something else which,both of them,have in common.

All of them are winning from time to time (and losing),what it changes is the frequency of the winning and losing sessions,as well the amounts being won or lost,but none of them could always win or lose.
Let's face it,you can not avoid defeat,but you could minimize it if you include it in your plans.
How could someone minimize the loses?
Here comes the important part so pay attention!
No matter what method of play and/or system you are using,it cannot be an overall winner. Why?
Let me remind you the opening of this post;

"...if something remains static,while the opposite side progressing,that eventually will overcome the static side."

Now let's place your system in the static side and the roulette results in the progressing,evolving,changing,dynamic side...which side do you think has the upper hand?
Why you think so?

There is no system/method which could satisfy all the conditions one might encounter on the ever changing roulette outcomes,every system could win just once or more,but none always because no matter the approach,it's static,passive,while the outcomes are not.

Therefore it cannot adapt to the new conditions which are not always the same,for every "left" there is a "right",for every "up" there is a "down"...and so on
Thus if you apply a strategy which supports only one side of the "coin",sooner or later you are going to lose.
This leads to the conclusion that there is the need for a flexible strategy which could been adjusted to any kind of outcomes.

Is it possible? Of course!

Let's begin with the definition of such strategy,shall we?
The very first thing we have to discard is to use the same approach all the time!
So there must be,at least, two quite different methods.The alternatives provide us flexibility,flexibility means an ability to adjust to the ever changing outcomes.

How one could know before hand which of the two (or more) methods would work on any given session?
One word: pre-qualification!
You have to pre-qualify the game before you sit down at the chair of the table.

Let's say you have some certain conditions to meet regarding your two (or more) alternatives,see if you were betting both of them simultaneously,which one would gain the most?
Option A or option B??
The pre-qualification period doesn't have to be too long,you have to act before it's too late.

Yet you might oppose my reasoning by stating:
"By the time I finish pre-qualification and begin betting,what I saw has changed because it didn't last long"
This might not be the case always,but yet again could happen,that's why you should have an alternative for applying both of your methods/systems simultaneously.

You might think:
"By applying two quite different systems simultaneously,how I could gain a profit? Because when one is winning the other is losing"
The answer is to increase very conservatively the winning side,while the losing one to remain on the same levels until it starts winning.

Whether you decide to select 2 or more approaches,it's up to you!
Whether you decide to apply 1 approach at a time or not,it's up to you!
What it matters most of all is the main principle, flexibility provides endurance and endurance provides the gain!
"Conquers the one who endures"

 

Just imagine the moon as the rotating white ball and earth as the rotor of the wheel which is rotating around its axis, science knows the exact orbit and speed of those celestial spheres, therefore they can predict with certainty and accuracy where the moon will be after a day, a week, a month...etc
Let me give you a few clues, the rotation of the moon around earth is on the same direction like the spin of the earth around its axis.
For a complete rotation around its axis needs 23.97 hours, while the moon needs 27.23 days for a full revolution around the earth.

Do you remember PI theorem?
Let me refresh your memory, the circumference of any given circle when it's divided by its diameter it always results 3.14

A sphere like the moon or a ball is a three dimensional circle, also the rotation, spinning, is a cyclic movement.
You could notice everywhere this cyclic patterns, from spiral galaxies, tornados, typhoons, planet orbits, to life cycle, money cycle, epidemies, seasons cycle, hands of clock towards clockwise and counterclockwise circles (time) and so on.

At ancient Greece there was a symbol among others which have been crafted in a magnificent ring, they called it "Ourovoros Ophis", literally means the snake which bites its tail, this form represents the cycle, a symbol which means the endless, eternal, unity, infinite, the one within everything and everything within the one.

Why do you think a circle has 360 degrees and a year 365 days? Do you think is just a coincidence?
If you cannot connect the clues so far, then you wouldn't be able to go further because this is the fundamental understanding of how things work.
Roulette wheel/game is no exception of the universal laws, a wheel is a circle, with the absence of number 0 would have been 36 numbers on the layout, thus 36 numbers of 10 degrees each in order to convert to the 360 degrees cycle.

But like on the annual cycle which has been added 5 days and comes to balance with a leap year every 4 years, something similar happened with roulette's layout, it has been added one more pocket, therefore 37 pockets around the wheel.
This change is trivial and can not influence in a meaningful way the universal law, roulette is no exception to this rule.
There are circles within circles and all of them are PI proportions, if you divide the wheel's layout in 4 sections by forming a cross you will get 4 groups of 9, let's forget for a moment the 0.

If a quarter of the wheel is 9 numbers then this section is 90 degrees or 1/4 of PI.
Orthogonal triangles have 90 degrees, their straight angle points toward a direction.
Each section of the wheel forms a different geometric figure, it's always a proportion of the total degrees.

Every new result is a new data stream towards us, consider it as a point in time and space.
Try to transform the curvy section of the wheel in a linear distance, do the same for three consecutive points.
Deduct the difference between them and apply it on the next spin.
But you have to remember that the direction will be the reversed opposite of the previous one.

When you combine the PI=3.14 and FI=1.618 you come to Golden Ratio or Golden Proportion, multiply them and divide them to see the result.
When you multiply them you find a figure very near 5, when you divide them you find approximately 2.
5 and 2 are the two opposite ends of the same "rope", out of 3 points we calculate a new direction in space, over the pinpoint pocket/number, cover its left and right neighbours for a total of 3 selections, bet them only twice.
Then repeat the process again and again, never raise your bet, always bet the same.

What I've tried to explain here can also be proved by science, just read wikipedia article about "action in distance", Bell's theorem, Bell's curve...etc