Roulette Undeniable proof for the "repeaters"

No method of picking bet is superior to all others. It will get same drawdowns and ups as any other bet. Why anybody expects to win with a magical bet selection, I can not even imagine? Be it turbo or anybody else nothing really works. Only thing that can better your prospects to win is a very clever money management meant for the long run.

 

Jeeeezzz turbos most famous words. A. Never ever use a negative progression. B. A system always should win flat bet first.

And surprise suprise who likes your post? Turbo. I hope by now you see what kind of guy he is?

 

No system wins flat bet in a random game with negative expectations. One who is ignorant of this fact is a totally naive person.

 

Sorry to say, but you aren't reading!
We play the hottest numbers from each cycle and only 35 spins max when no hit comes.
Numbers that keep hitting in the next cycle will get a raise at the end of the cycle and will be betted again in the next cycle.
numbers that didn't appear again in the cycle after they became hot, will be removed.
this will make sure we aren't betting again and again on numbers that have become cold, but are betting on numbers that remain hot!
Again, this is the explenation turbo gave, and i didn't say it has any merit, it hasn't. again, i've tested this to death and it won't hold.
but try for yourself.
1. track 35 spins.
2. bet all numbers with 2 hits or more with 1 unit all thw way up to spin 70.
3. numbers that have hit from that list will get a raise and will be bet on again for 35 spins.
4. numbers from our list that didn't hit again will be removed.
5. numbers from the previous cycle that have hit 2 times or more will be added to our list.
6. rolling basis!

this is what turbo did with a 1000 spin sessions. now only made playable for a bm setting by me. does it work? short term it can, long run,? sorry no.

 

@Jekhg;
You never knew exact Turbo's way(s), same as many others.

 

@Bombus;
Bago is right in his short example. But again, this was not a system as many of you think, just idea.

Turbo would never play on this way, but you all now suddenly "figured out" that this is his way and immediately proclaimed him as a loser.
Shame, shame, shame!!!

 

This is what's explained by turbo. what he has explained is a method, a method of an example. unplayable at a bm, so the cycles need to be shorter, that why i've tested this on normal cycles. it doesn't work! Again he showed a method, not a system. not the same pal. but this is all hocus pocus thinking. but go ahead, keep running along with turbo. there will be a time when you find out you were chasing a fairytale all along.

 

But you don't really believe that, do you? According to you, the "RTM" bet selection reduces the drawdown in the worst sequences.

Do you actually have any statistical evidence that it does?

 

Actually no Turbo never said that specifically. Maybe its your interpretation of his method - though I cant blame you for that he always were a bit cryptic.

If you notice enough of his graphs you will see that he starts betting around 20-24 spins and keeps going from there.

Given (statististically) that in a cycle you will have a relevalt number of unhits and 1x some 2x and less 3x it only makes sense to wait for the last.
I've only proposed a progression to counter the missing hits although its a negative one.
You can test it of course.

 

I never managed to use positive progression effectively.
I already know what kind of guy he is and I respect him for the fact that he spends a lot of his time sharing his methods which although I dont follow to the letter, have helped me immensely.

 

Cha-cha-cha - you also not know how good he is as a dancer and never will know, because you never will dance with him...We all know that Turbo is champion of the Moon and what from that?
No matter how he plays and at all if he plays, the essence is not in that - the essence is that his math is other than we use !!! And we think that two right maths cant be...

Turbo is champion in spending time in forums - that is clear that here he is number one! But that only talks that he has problems with results.
I pointed to his math mistakes, of course, he ignores that, because he has other math where that is not mistakes, but brilliant inventions...

He and a few others simply live in his own world and not see nothing around...

 

[QUOTE = "jekhb1976, publicación: 88935, miembro: 4822"] Lamento decirlo, ¡pero no estás leyendo!
Jugamos los números más populares de cada ciclo y solo 35 giros máximos cuando no llega ningún golpe.
Los números que siguen golpeando en el próximo ciclo obtendrán un aumento al final del ciclo y se volverán a apostar en el próximo ciclo.
se eliminarán los números que no aparecieron nuevamente en el ciclo después de que se calentaron.
¡Esto asegurará que no apuestemos una y otra vez por números que se han enfriado, sino que apuesten por números que permanecen calientes!
Nuevamente, esta es la exaltación que dio turbo, y no dije que tuviera ningún mérito, no la tenía. Una vez más, he probado esto hasta la muerte y no aguantará.
Pero inténtalo tú mismo.
1. seguimiento de 35 giros.
2. apueste todos los números con 2 golpes o más con 1 unidad hacia arriba para girar 70.
3. los números que han acertado de esa lista obtendrán un aumento y se apostará nuevamente por 35 giros.
4. se eliminarán los números de nuestra lista que no volvieron a acertar.
5. los números del ciclo anterior que hayan alcanzado 2 veces o más se agregarán a nuestra lista.
6. base rodante!

Esto es lo que hizo turbo con 1000 sesiones de spin. ahora solo se puede jugar para una configuración de bm por mí. ¿Funciona? a corto plazo puede, a largo plazo? lo siento, no. [/ CITA]

It doesn't work like that Eddy.
He gave some examples of what happens several times, they are basic forms of explanation, but it is not the way to apply it.
The Turbo form uses between 2-6 numbers and has been releasing some numbers that cool and catch some possible future hot, the hot ones.
And then you can clearly use progression by cycles or by blows, both are very good progressions, but to win with it, you need your flat game to be a winner most of the time.

 

So now Turbo is just an inspiration.

By the looks of these descriptions, you would think we are talking about art not math.

The scam continues........

 

I seem to inspire you to post don't I ?
You have contributed absolutely nothing to the forum, your posts are
only to go against whatever I might say.
So you see the problem right ? lol
You should keep posting that I'm leaving in shame and disgust and that no one
cares what I post - it's clearly not true given the facts, but continue to say it.
You have nothing else to do here.
The trolling continues.........

 

Sad Mr Math expert, sad.

You still to this point have not disputed what my original post was about.
You even agreed that the "W"'s and "L"s do not happen at 50/50 even though we
are making predictions based on 50% of the available bets.
Until such time you (or anyone) can prove what I displayed and tested is "wrong"...
then I am correct.
In closing (a joke, 18 more pages please.......) Repeaters give the player an advantage.

 

Remember the good old days (not that long ago) when you thought the opposite of what you do now ?

What are you afraid of? Where is all of this anger coming from?
YOU are the problem.
Cheers.

 

Mr. Turbo, if there are people who care about what they publish and every day we try to understand more about the new things they are publishing.
You mentioned in other threads some things about patterns, you would be interested in learning more about patterns.
the one of the hot ones if I understand it and I know how it works, but could I talk about more ways to see the patterns?
I am interested in learning more about the patterns ... could I put some clues about the best way to use them or the best is the hot ones?

Thank you for everything you publish, personally I really like being busy learning everything related to winning the game in different ways!
What do you think is the best way you have?

 

Sergio, you like study Turbo? Well this would be right up Mr J's alley. Just one hot number.

 

This was before you went full-victim and refused to agree to terms for anyone to test your ideas.


If you had something you wouldn't be here posting your updated victim-status every day.........you'd be making millions at the casino. Each and every post you make here literally reinforces your own failure at the game, but it serves as a great reminder to us not to worship false idols.

On the other hand, this might be your peak, so enjoy it.

 

[QUOTE = "Travieso pero agradable, post: 88981, miembro: 5825"] Sergio, ¿te gusta estudiar Turbo? Bueno, esto sería justo en el callejón del Sr. J. Solo un número importante.
[ATTACH = full] 4860 [/ ATTACH] [/ QUOTE]
Hi, we don't know each other, but if you want we can meet and talk privately and exchange forms, I really have ways to win, but I love to learn more, everything that is to learn is there I'll be even if I have other ways to win, because I love being Entertaining looking for more solutions.
I'm sure you have my email and Skype data, add me and we'll talk ...
Cheers