1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette Undeniable proof for the "repeaters"

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by TurboGenius, Dec 22, 2019.

  1. SERGIO

    SERGIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2018
    Likes:
    74
    Location:
    ESPAÑA
    Is there something wrong with having ways to win and want to learn more and look for more ways? Anyway I can find some better, so I never stop working, if scientists who discover things stop looking and work for having found a solution to something, would not find other solutions or better things do not you think? I probably don't understand my passion for learning more, but I don't care either.
    Of course I earn money and I have several ways, but do I have to prove something to someone? If I show something, whatever they will tell me about everything but handsome, as always, then it makes no sense.
    I will not continue with this, I think it has become very clear, but what you work to get things, then you can not give away, just as I will not reveal any information or system you have of other people, because you respect!

    luck
     
  2. Jefra

    Jefra Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2016
    Likes:
    20
    Location:
    World
    @Sheeptracker
    You still don't get it. Noone is accusing you to be a VB player. It is just a plus. I am also using it too together with other 2-3 systems.

    BUT it is very disturbing to see VB players in "systems/methods" section talking that ALL systems are total BS, and that is ridiculous. Everyone knows that none system will work all the time on all spins, same as VB also does not work all the time (except for A and C)

    SO Sheeptracker, why you always must comment every system idea when you are totaly not interested in the systems??? Same goes to all other misfits.

    It is not disaster/end of a world if you don't understand Turbo's ideas, it is just a shame, but it is OK. With attacks you will not understand better, nor faster. JUST OPPOSITE.
     
  3. Benas

    Benas Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2018
    Likes:
    156
    Occupation:
    Looking for peoples who play better...
    Location:
    Ania,PL
    First, nobody uses the word ALL. Second and the main talk is about simply logic - negative bet cant produces a positive result. This is simple logic and if you that not understand nobody can help you.
    That is funny. How a player can use Vb if he does not know it? I think that soon you will say that you are super VB expert :)...
    Vb offer positive bet so +X , the system offers negative bet so -X you use them 2-3 so your result will be Y=+X-2.5X=-1.5X :D
    You like that - can continue to play to minus.
    Turbo may be simply kidding all,( I afraid that he is kidding also himself ) the difference is that you believe, because not know what is positive bet what is a negative bet, but others doubt because they try and lost. You also try and lost, but want to be important, so hide your losings from others, or say that you play differently. As now - you immediately become Vb expert, but such expert who cant answer to any question about Vb :D...
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2020
  4. Ka2

    Ka2 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2019
    Likes:
    192
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Why learn more? You already have the holy grail did you not oh wait you want to make it holier. I see why you like turbos math so much
     
  5. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    Jefra, it is just like you're going into a math forum and say that sometimes 1+1 is not making always 2, sometimes with Turbo's ideas it can make 3. Do you think people there will try to understand your logic to know how come sometime it can make 3 or they'll just see you as a troll.

    Sergio, yeah me too: last week i found a gold mine but it was just to find it, i am searching for a new one now.
     
    Nathan Detroit and Ka2 like this.
  6. SERGIO

    SERGIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2018
    Likes:
    74
    Location:
    ESPAÑA
    [QUOTE = "Fichas, publicación: 89159, miembro: 6529"] ¿Por qué aprender más? Ya tienes el santo grial, ¿no? Oh, espera, quieres hacerlo más sagrado. Veo por qué te gustan tanto las matemáticas de turbos [/ QUOTE]
    You never know how far you can go, I have no limits to learn, even if I have gold, I will always try to get diamonds and when I have diamonds I will look for something better, do you have any problem with my ambition?
    surely my ambition is what made me go far and not you ...
     
  7. Ka2

    Ka2 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2019
    Likes:
    192
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Lol!!! Tip1 if you have an edge no matter how small. the compounding results will make you a millionaire in no time!

    But instead of utilizing that edge you are busy on forums trying to lure people over and over again to give you a free lunch.

    Also why do you think dyksexlic vaddis and all the others havent been heard of ever since? Because they sure liked the attention on the forums.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 9, 2020
    theLaw and Sharptracker like this.

  8. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    His logic goes even further... He found a gold mine, request people to add him on skype to ask them to send money to get the location of the mine... The money they send will help to search now for a diamond mine.

    Yeah but from what i see, you go farest in the foolishness direction... for sure.
     
    Ka2 likes this.
  9. precogm

    precogm Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2019
    Likes:
    29
    Location:
    somewhere
    haha I never thought I would see the day jekhb would turn against his great teacher Turbo. Well I am happy for you! But I feel sorry for those who still hope for a winning system using repeaters. There is no difference between cold numbers and hot numbers they are both useless classifications if you want to predict the next number, sector, dozen or whatever.

    I like your new method of play, pick a few numbers and play them. If you win it was due to luck, if you lose it was due to luck. That is all you can ask for.
     
    Nathan Detroit likes this.
  10. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    .............and that`s thaw the cookie crumbles .
     
  11. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    That` s the way the cookie crumbles . 9 correction )
     
  12. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    You just put the light on Reading Randomness. In a nutshell that is all that it is. I just say pick 18 or 19 numbers and see what luck you get. You can pick the red numbers and if they are in bad luck then the black numbers would be in good luck. So instead of just having one group you can have 12 groups like in the reading randomness software charts. Then you just look for any group having good luck. It"s that simple. So then all you are doing is looking for consistent duration of good luck. It's not complicated. I chose 18 numbers because that is what an even chance bet results in.

    So the next big deal system should be in the discovery of good and bad luck, the sizes of luck occurrence, and the real world expectations regarding exploiting good luck. Nobody talks about this much. They always want a weakness in a set of rules or numbers to exploit the casino by. They always want a magical solution. The truth is they should be looking at finding and using good luck. Where are the Turbo tricks for exploiting good and bad luck? When is he going to figure that one out?
     
    Nathan Detroit and precogm like this.
  13. precogm

    precogm Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2019
    Likes:
    29
    Location:
    somewhere

    Yes I agree. I have been advocating for the study of luck for a long time. Too many people want a get rich quick roulette system (WHICH WILL NEVER EXIST).

    My views on luck are based on esoteric and biofeedback signals, such as dowsing.

    Have you ever had that feeling a number will hit, and it does?
    Or have you played a number/dozen/color for 20 spins and have it not come up. But as soon as you switch to another bet it comes up?
    Have you ever played the wrong number and win?

    I believe whatever expolits you investigate it has to be bigger than roulette. Luck is a universal concept not restricted to just roulette.
     
    Nathan Detroit and gizmotron like this.
  14. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I have a life long great experience with premonitions including single numbers hitting. I have had tons of premonitions regarding other things than gambling all come true and have mentioned them to people before they occurred even. I hit a premonition number, when it happens, about three or four times and then give up on it. I can't control it at will. It is also my nemesis. I get into phases where I go by that feeling of premonition and it ends up dragging me down when I play Roulette. That is why I created this structured method regarding the seeking of good luck stretches in consistent sizes. It's the difference between flying a plane by feeling or the other way of flying by instruments. I deliberately ignore the feeling that a thing is happening, even when it is happening. When I go by feeling I end up losing. I want it to last but I can't let go of it when it stops. I know all this. I'm an expert on my own ability to conceive of precognition. I stay away from it on purpose. For me it is a sucker bet. It is the primary distraction that I have always referred to as needing a self control method. I don't talk about it. I never had until now. It has always been my very own private struggle. I have it to compare with Reading Randomness. I know that it is a scattered and seldom capacity compared to the structured method of RR. I've been using precog for more than 30 years in Roulette and all my life in things that are going to happen. Almost all occurrences of premonition are about what is going to happen to me. I tend to ignore it. I'm not amazed by it. It serves very little purpose and has very little to do with living my life.
     
    precogm likes this.

  15. 6th-sense

    6th-sense Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2019
    Likes:
    66
    Location:
    Uk
    Just for you Sergio the crowd in this video is the forum crowd and visitors crowd

     
  16. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    This is a group that has a couple of friends of mine in it, Tanner and Zink, lead guitar and drums. And this is now, not way back when a mixed group was a novelty.

     
  17. precogm

    precogm Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2019
    Likes:
    29
    Location:
    somewhere
    That is an interesting approach. If Reading randomness is working to control and aid your precognition that is an interesting method.

    But does this mean practioners of your method need to be able to perform precognition to a certain degree before they can achieve success with it?
     
  18. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I use RR to control premonitions by ignoring premonitions. So there is absolutely no need to feel like something is going to happen. Things happen by coincidence and some things that happen by coincidence happen to come in the form of consistent sizes. That's when I take luck to an overwhelming level. It's not premonition or precognition. It's situational awareness. The purpose of situational recognition is to see what is happening across 12 different sets of numbers. Reading Randomness is just a method of seeing syntactical recognition based on formations that are more common than not. You see the form and its characteristic qualities and you exploit it as long as the formations continue. There is no need for a sixth sense capability. What is needed is training and the resultant skill that follows.
     
    precogm likes this.
  19. precogm

    precogm Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2019
    Likes:
    29
    Location:
    somewhere
    Ok, thats interesting. So does this mean that a powerful enough super computer using AI would be able to roulette?
     
  20. Bombus

    Bombus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2016
    Likes:
    436
    Location:
    amongst flowers
    I've been saying it for years, systems are all up to luck. But that doesn't mean you can't use repeaters in one form or another to exploit good luck. You could use sleepers too but they have much less visual dexterity.

    Generally, people are not very good at being lucky so the luck needs to be built into the system. That's the way forward IMO.
     
    gizmotron likes this.

Share This Page