Roulette Use Quantum entanglement to win at roulette

Link

Link

I've seen some crackpot roulette theories in my time, but this takes the prize.

 

Good laugh Michaela, here is another one from a guy which username was "Fruity" on GamblersGlen, who was making fun of Steve Hourmouzis' shitty computers:

Topic: MADE 4.5 million pounds from this
Fruity Posted: 28-Feb-04 14:21
Edit

Profile
Ok here's the lowdown I have a parrot that would sit on your shoulder and whispers the winning number in your ear. It's not illegal and casino's cannot do anything about it. The hit rate is 1 in 18 depending on what the parrot has eaten (make sure it's not crap casino food).

The price at the moment is half a million but within a year it'll go down to 10,000 then the price will be halved every month after that or until the parrot dies.

Only interested parties may apply or else I will flame you by showing my intelligence. The parrot will have a small c4 bomb in it so if I suspect you of backstabbing me then I will blow up the parrot or send the jamaicans around to sort you out.

I'm a multi millionaire also from my other inventions where I can walk up to any ATM and take money out without a card. So you can see I don't need the sales. Plus because I'm so filfy rich I can spend as much time as possible on a small message board like this to promote this sale to try and help you lot out, because without me you lot are nothing.

The only places that I know this won't work are in the poorer countries because if you brought a parrot in they'd probably eat it.

This is also published on the internet with lots of people backing me up. Eventhough they all have the same IP addresses as myself trust me they're not me.

I had a group of people come to see the parrot but because the parrot didn't like them it didn't perform. They kept on teasing the parrot and clearly didn't know how to treat one. I have all this on CCTV for all to see which I will post.

LOLOLOL sorry I can't go on.

 

lol. But that poster was clearly joking, whereas the quantum entanglement theory is supposed to be taken seriously.

 

Don't you guys know that you can't beat this game? You must first beat your own human nature before you can allow yourself to be satisfied with the same advantage that the casino allows itself. It's not the odds that beats you. It's your own desire to want more. It's the same thing that runs the Washington insider Elite and the power and money that they control. It's the same thing that runs City Hall all across our free nation. The casino has the money and you want it. The game fluctuates between being ahead and being behind. But nobody is naturally attuned to being satisfied with a win. The casino can outlast your own selfish greed. It's like a banana hung from a string on a stick for you. All you can see is the banana that you can never catch up to. If you can be satisfied by winning little battles then you can allow yourself to win the wars.

But everyone wants to change the odds that can't be changed. If the casinos made the odds fair, got rid of the zeros and still paid 35 to one, then they would still beat the players at just about the same rate as they do now. It's not the odds that beat you. It's the occasional sequential downswings that beat you. All it takes is a swarm of bad luck and you lose all that you have advanced to yourselves. People do not want to work at self awareness or playing awareness. It's the first and last thing to learn too. So we go on flamboyant fantasy rides with Turbo Genius as he side steps any need to consider self awareness. All the forums do this. There is always some wiz-bang-pow system that draws the flies to the shit. The self awareness of that is that there will always be a hot system that leaves thinking logically behind. It's at the very heart of seeking pleasure as the primary goal and not the satisfaction that one should already have within them. You will never be a winner as long as you can never be satisfied.

 

I preached this sermon years ago and most people thought I was a fruit cake, though it really only pertains to problem gamblers, like alrelax for instance. But I'm glad to see at least you picked up on it, although not necessarily from me.

Even though I agree with much of what you say above, within the pure essence of the challenge to systematically conquer this game, and without any self indulgent excuses, I would argue that the ability to "side step any need to consider self awareness" is of paramount importance.

 

.

 

Michaela is referring to the brainstorming thread started by esoito on betselection.cc

esoito is not fond of me. I believe because in the beginning he considered me a kindred spirit, but I proved not to be, at least in his perception.

Even so, I would argue that esoito's 'crackpot theories' have just as much potential to succeed as any main stream systematical approach.

Even though he has wrongly misjudged me, I applaud his nobility.

 

This must be considered crackpot as well then. You can use any system that you want to and it will produce the same three conditions but never at the same time. It will work very well for a time. It will work flat, neither good for you or bad for you. It will work very bad for you and kill your bankroll. You can use any poison that you want to. You will get the same experiences. My favorite is using an educated guess based on coincidences. They tend to follow a synchronicity to when a streak of sleeping dozens also keeps pace with conditions working very well. Blind guessing just does not do this.

 

I was taught to throw darts at the numbers, but larger casinos tend to frown on this.

 

The real pros use monkeys to throw the darts. Just as they do for stock picks.

 

Yes, I agree: they have as much potential to succeed as any other system. That is, none.

The reason why using quantum entanglement is so ludicrous when applied to roulette is because the results of particle physics apply only to the subatomic world, not the everyday world of things like wheelbarrows, umbrellas and roulette wheels. It's just a pretentious use of "advanced" concepts in order to come across as more sophisticated and intelligent. The newbies fall for this kind of crap. And that guy Thomas ("themagician") is the most arrogant and unpleasant character I've ever come across in any forum. He sucks up to esoito and behaves himself on betselection.cc, but not on the roulette30 forum, where he knows he can get away with it.

 

Why ''Allrelax'' is a problem gambler?
Do you know him personally?

Why don't you let him know about your opinion, you know where to find him or do you prefer to characterise in such manner when the other side cannot respond because he is not aware of your mudslide?

 

I've used those so called platforms, they are merely Excel spreadsheets, the user inputs the results one after the other and the platform suggests either 1 up to 3 sectors or 1 up to 3 numbers, usually 3 but this varies from platform to platform.
Not all of them have the same degree of effectiveness, I've downloaded approximately 10 of them (there are more) and tested them against the same spins in order to form an objective conclusion.
Additionally, I've tried a few different betting variables per platform, the results vary...I would not rush to dismiss them as worthless, sorting out the best platforms in combination with the best betting variables was tedious and time consuming because you have to place results manually, one by one.
When I attempted to suggest for platforms automation (bot) Tom got upset with me and to my surprise e banned me from his private forum team.
I've not broke any rules to the best of my knowledge, the rules were clear, members could discuss freely about Tom's platforms on public cyber places such as forums, but they don't be allowed to share or sell any of the platforms.
Probably Thomas thought that I'm going to give to a 3rd party his work in order to automated it but I didn't.
All I did was to bring to his attention that t would be very handy to automate them, if I'd wanted to just do it then I'd not let him know, isn't it obvious?!
Thus Thom judged me wrong but I've nothing against him because everyone is prone to mistakes from time to time.

 

I can't post anything even slightly controversial on the betselection forum anymore. Esoito is back and has me on permanent post moderation, even though Victor sent me a PM telling me the moderation was to be removed in a few days. That was weeks ago.

He did this once before last time he was a mod. Kept me on post moderation for several months because I told some one there system was like "pissing in the wind"

He really is very biased when it comes to me, so I can't post it as I see it.

Esoito is a tyrant, plain and simple.

 

This is always a tricky subject. I kinda like Bombus, I kinda dont...trying to be a good mod and not bias is complicated from all angles etc.

but, a forum is no fun when everything is under a watchful eye. I dont go there either. Its too much talk of bacc. and crazy systems with roulette that will NEVER work. Its pointless being there.

If you have something decent with this game, run with it and fuck everyone else.

Ken

 

Ken's advice has been a God send to me. I wanted to make sure that my gambling ideas were out there before I kick the bucket. They are. I've done a good enough job. He makes so much sense to stop trying to teach people how it works for me. I have it working now and am completely satisfied with what works for me. I see a few here that have things working for them too. It's all good man, Saul Goodman.