1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette Using parameters to hit sleepers

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by delectus, Jul 27, 2018.

  1. Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone

    Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone Well-Known Member Lineage to Founders

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2015
    Likes:
    931
    Occupation:
    Shoe Cobbler
    Location:
    Merica
    Gizmo,

    Why do you suppose it is that all of the experts, mathematicians, and even history imply that you're a fool?
     
  2. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Because they all have inferiority complexes and still have pimples. That's not to overlook your grand contribution to the world of figures, algorithms, and the boundless trajectory's of a bouncing pill. Yes, the world will remember you for cross dressing as "Captain Obvious."

     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2018
  3. John Blerg

    John Blerg Well-Known Member 👹 Troll 👹

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2018
    Likes:
    189
    Occupation:
    Founder of CalAsia Proven Baccarat Wagering Method
    Location:
    Self Banned Troll
    Why do you do the same thing on here you seem to have done on Betslection and other websites? I also have to side with the member named Gizmo you've made no contribution to the community
     
  4. Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone

    Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone Well-Known Member Lineage to Founders

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2015
    Likes:
    931
    Occupation:
    Shoe Cobbler
    Location:
    Merica
    [​IMG]

    When they use the term "mathboyz" to describe us, they're basically implying that they're not one and that they really suck at math.
    I'm not sure why some people believe that it's cool to brag that they're stupid. For now, at least they're not bragging that they're illiterate!
     
  5. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Snowman, the day anybody mistakes you for a mathBoyz will be the day that you read randomness. You are not an "us," and you never will be. But thanks for the huge laugh.
     
  6. delectus

    delectus Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2018
    Likes:
    25
    Location:
    uk
    Well, for a few days I was posting my Trial Runs, no comments, I thought
    that's strange, when a tidal wave of crap appeared lol.

    Off to the casino today, will resume T R later.
     
  7. Jerome

    Jerome Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2018
    Likes:
    172
    Occupation:
    Self-Employed
    Location:
    England
    Gizmo, when are you going to figure out that in order to see something, it has to actually exist?

    Sorry delectus, please continue with your apophenia masterclass. :D
     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2018

  8. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    He wrote the best book i've read about roulette.
     
  9. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    This is probably the most telling affirmation of all time. I congratulate you on at least 12 years of making the real point your side has been attempting to make. Of course your logical conclusions make sense to you. You can't see it because, to you, it does not exist. Any further discussion with your kind is pointless. I wonder when or by whom you will see the unseen. Good luck with that epiphany. The discussion with the absolutist probability crowd is over. You are no longer the mathBoyz. You are the blind leading the blind.
     
  10. Jerome

    Jerome Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2018
    Likes:
    172
    Occupation:
    Self-Employed
    Location:
    England
    LOL, most members contribute only ignorance, whereas he contributes common sense, logic, and math. His contribution is badly needed otherwise the forums will be completely dominated by fallacies and scammers. If the newbies only see fallacies the infection of ignorance will continue.
     
  11. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    When you see a mushroom cloud in your math logic, "duck and cover."
     
  12. delectus

    delectus Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2018
    Likes:
    25
    Location:
    uk
    T R 7

    01 01 027
    02 03
    03 08 025
    04 33 024
    05 06
    06 14
    07 27
    08 31 020
    09 10
    10 29 018
    11 03
    12 07 016
    13 24 015
    14 13 014
    15 06 013
    16 23 012
    17 28
    18 14 010
    19 36 009 116/172 121
    20 03 008
    21 10 007
    22 27 006
    23 28 005
    24 30 004 069/125 124
    25 26 003
    26 32 002
    27 17 001 XXX
    28 29 000

    19 066:122
    20 044:100

    17 has been revised to 077/133 (just missed it by 2 spins)
     
  13. delectus

    delectus Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2018
    Likes:
    25
    Location:
    uk
    'Apophenia' I had to look it up in case it was an insult lol

    Human beings are usually curious animals, so why not examine this project. I have
    provided as much detail as possible, nothing hidden. I have provided all the info
    from actual spins from a roulette wheel. If you don't understand something, just
    ask and I will do my best to give you a detailed reply.
     
    Nathan Detroit likes this.
  14. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080

  15. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I have stated for the past decade that seeing patterns, streaks, dominance, trends, and your mother's skid marks in her underwear are all figments of your imagination. There is no law of thirds, no law of trends, and no law of math that confirms that using an excuse to make a guess, a bet, that that guess is in any form a prediction of the next spin. Now let that sink in past that inch thick skull you use for a lump above your shoulders. It's just a guess if you base it on Apophenia. It's not a fallacy because nothing is expected and nothing is due. It is just pure coincident that it works sometimes. You guys are clueless with regards to the effectiveness states and their value as a strategy. Just a handful of you use it. Those that do just happen to be the best players on the forums too. Did you hear this time? Did your brain register it this time? You might want to check with yourself to see if you can in fact think for yourself. Just like drugs, Just Say No To Prediction.

    If you want to denigrate me then do it regarding a real data stream, the effectiveness states. They are real phenomenon and they do have phases of duration that are in fact scientific data. Where's the probability factors for that?

    Don't bother answering. You guys never have, chickens.
     
  16. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    Damn mate, you must levitate when you're playing..! aren't you scared pitboss notices it??? :)
     
  17. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I'm never sacred of that. It means I'm killing the casino.
     
  18. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    Mmmm i guess the dealer would ask Pitboss "Do i let the levitating guy play at the table?"
    Pitboss: Yeah because against all odds, he's only looking for 3 net wins (wtf??)
     
    Nathan Detroit and gizmotron like this.
  19. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    "I just got done with another two and one half hour training session with student #1. It's starting to get to a point that standard deviation won't allow it to recover to the expectation of a session ratio of 2.33 to 1. He starts each day now by doing 10 sessions in front of me while we also discuss what the statistics of what he is doing means in terms of ratios. While he is doing that I wrote a sim that just blindly bets on Red only on the single zero wheel. After 100,000 sessions run it determined that with the zero the win loss ratio for sessions won or lost was 1.8 to 1. I took the zero out and ran it again. This time it came out at 2.33 to 1.

    That is the exact number my method needs to break even. Now my method includes the zero and it needs to balance at 2.33 to 1 in order to break even. But the House edge comes out to 1.8 to 1 in power testing the large number value. So in reality, my method must beat 1.8 to 1 to prove it's better than the statistical large number average.

    Today student #1 had 9 wins and 1 loss today. So now the testing is up to 52 wins and 10 losses for a session's lost or won ratio of 5.2 to 1. Now this is not some mechanical system testing. The student is running real challenges to beat randomness by reading it and guessing. There is no prediction being used either.

    You guys will have to grasp onto the last possible explanation here and that is that it's a wild lucky streak. So start pilling on about how this is just a small sample and that it proves nothing. I can wipe out everything with this knowledge. I can make you skeptics eat crow. But my plan is to get a small army around the world to make that happen. I don't want anything from them either. They are free to go get what they can for as long as they can and keep it all for themselves. This is certainly better than what Ed Thorp did to Blackjack. He was a total blabbermouth. "
     
  20. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    Well you know i overcame this step where i wanted to know&check all supposed winning systems... I want you to know that i'm absolutely not jealous or something and i want you to know that i met tons of people like you (who believed they could rule the game in a math way)... I just feel sad to see so much wasted energy&time to satisfy a curiosity... if only it was spent in a good way!

    When you play lottery the house edge is huge, they can apply this edge because they make us dream with the big jackpot that you'd need to hit only once, we're counscious about the very low probability and we don't care about the 50% edge because of that jackpot dream. Try to play lottery for a year and see about what % you lost, you have very low chances to be in advance with a huge edge ...

    While at roulette or any other low house edge game, the casino will have to bear variance (not a problem with his stack) because his edge is low and lower the edge is greaters the swings will be! it means you have good chances to be in advance and to feel that you can rule the game, the trap is perfect and same kind of trap was allready applied in 1650...
     

Share This Page