Misc Wellbush Paradox I and II

Ah, hahahahahahaha! WOV are all in a tiz over Wellbush! Hahahahaha! Well, wadya know? They can't work him out! Well welcome to my world GamblingForums, it's me Wellbush! Yes, I am here in GamblingForums land and have been for a little while but probably haven't been noticed. If you don't know me, you may find out if you search WOV land for what I've been posting under my ID there: Wellbush.

You'll soon find out they don't know what to do with me there, hahahahahaha! They got so many rules there, you'd be suspended for farting! They constantly wanna suspend me on WOV, but they often have to think: "for what?" He's done nothing wrong but insult some who believe the math should not be questioned! That's right my friends. Don't question the math some think, because one should just believe the math without question!

Well anyone who believes that, better stop reading this post! Hahahahahahaha! And I won't waste your time, I'll cut right to the chase. There are two paradoxes I have discovered in the math of gambling. So here they are:

Wellbush Paradox I

1. negative progression sequences mean the gambler continuing along the sequence will always return to a profit in the long run (this is theoretical math. it does not take into account table minimums/maximums, nor the size of the player's bankroll).

2. -EV says the gambler always loses in the long run.

the above two statements cannot co-exist. it's a paradox.

Wellbush Paradox II

The Gambler's Fallacy states that every fair play in a game of chance, is independent, and has no better or worse chance based on past play.

How pathetic that the math community believe this! So, the math community unequivocally state the percentages that will eventually occur in each game, for the house, and the gambler.

But how can this be true, due to the Gambler's Fallacy???? Another paradox!!!!

How can math say on one hand, you cannot give predictions re chances, but on the other hand predict future chances down to percentage points? Is the math community moronic???

There you are my friends. Two clear paradoxes that the math community have embraced for centuries! Ah, hahahahaha!

 

The good news is you will find plenty of fans here. In fact the majority of posters are either scammers or believe the same as you.

And your argument over there should be what you believe is just as possible or believable than what MDawg spews on a daily basis. In fact, yours has better odds than claiming casinos fawn over him when he takes them for tens of thousands weekly while they comp him like a king.

Your mistake was not paying the Wizard off and getting him to sign a non disclosure agreement.

 

Don't question the math some think, because one should just believe the math without question!

Well anyone who believes that, better stop reading this thread, Boz! Ah, hahahahahahaha!

 

Is this the same Wellbush who pretends to be an Australian? That guy is one dumb motherfucker. I mean, there isn’t a single person on earth who believes his charade. LOLZ

 

Yep, you of all the billions of people who have lived, have uncovered two paradoxes that, paradoxically, prop up whatever gambling strategies you employ. I am in awe. I am in the presence of Leonardo da Wellbush.

A thousand years from now, you will be taught in college Un-Math courses, and monuments to you will adorn public buildings. Oh God, how I wish I had been born with your mind and wisdom.

 

Ah, hahahahaha! They turn up and spew out foul stuff but can't understand the concepts! Let's bow to the mindless ones! Ah, hahahahaha! How great thou aren't! Ah, hahahahaha!

They feel great after they attack! They have accomplished! Accomplished what? Who knows what psychological benefit they feel! Ah, hahahahaha! Give them a bone! Crunch! Chomp! Like dogs they go after it! Ah, hahahahaha! Can they understand?!!!! Not when they're chomping on the bone!!!! Ah, hahahahaha!

 

WB: "Here's a paradox!"

Aholes: "Ah, it's a load of crap!"

WB: "Why?"

Aholes: "Dunno! It's just a load of crap!"

WB: "Ah, hahahahaha!"

 

Welcome to Gambling Forums, Wellbush! You'll find that GF is a much more lenient, tolerant, and open-minded place than WOV is and you're free to speak your mind here, not restrain yourself because you're afraid that you'll be Suspended.

 

cheers. thanks karen, or nathan, or....?

 

You're welcome! You can call me Karen Nathan!

 

i may say something more about my paradoxes sometime. for now though, i wanna say that gamblingforums is a breath of fresh air compared to some other forums. not any claustraphobic rules everywhere, and some sound posters that don't seem to be only intent on trolling

i note a couple of interesting posters already: turbogenius and gizmotron. i think we can learn a lot from them and probably many more on this site

 

I have a question for you Wellbush, and I ask that you respond honestly.

Your embracing of progression wagering systems and other voodoo gambling concepts. What have your net monetary results been from that?

 

You forgot NathanDetroit in that All-Star trio

 

The underrated BeachedWhalesClitoris with the best avatar, speaks the truth once again !

 

I have trialled negative progression 4 or 5 times at my local casino. Not one winning trial yet.

 

Hi Karumba, and welcome to GF. Glad you took up my suggestion to join here.

 

Cheers

 

It was an excellent suggestion. Karumba is going to be treated here WAY better than he was at WOV. Here they don't throw you out like yesterday's trash for challenging Math Claims... In fact, they don't throw you out at all. The WORST offenders get their access slowed down(Imagine having to wait 20 minutes to view a single thread). And they get back names under their username such as John Blerg has "Troll," under his username. These are the WORST things to happen, no banning, so you can relax here as your personality will not get you your access slowed or a bad name under your Username...

 

Wellbush Paradox 1?

Not really. A player will always win if he has an infinite bankroll. -EV assumes a finite bankroll.