Roulette What if I told you...

I'm not trying to Fuck with you. I just wanted to know because I feel I have a significant exploitable opportunity. I have approached so called VB /Clocking experts only to be highly disappointed. However a partner of mine was able to make some headway with no expertise and in a very short periodof time. Unfortunately things changed, but I have scouted and found simular opportunities.
An expert should be able to really get a hold on it quickly and efficiently. Something that would probably take the non expert many months..

 

To follow up I'm trying to find out if you are someone I should consider divulging this information to. Or if your even interested. Even if you are perhaps I would just be wasting my time and diseminating information for no reason and possibly tipping off the wrong people and killing a possible future opportunity.

 

Me or Sir? You didn't really put it out there and I didn't want to make an assumption.

 

Isn't it blatantly obvious who AxelWolf was talking to ?
You say I have issues..... laughs. "a little "out there", or Delusional?" indeed.

 

I don't like to make assumptions, Turbo. The thread isn't about me, and he's been talking to you and others in this thread as well. Better to ask than to assume.

 

You've done just that all through this thread of mine.
Nevermind. I have a headache.

 

I haven't, though, but what you HAVE avoided, is providing proof of what you've claimed.

 

Axel if you want to discuss VB outside of the forum, drop me a PM with your email.

 

The other guy thinks everything is about him. lol.

I can "quote" assumption after assumption from this thread that you've made.
I don't need to do that. Start your own thread about whatever topic you like and have a ball with it.
Right now - you're in mine, making assumptions - demanding proof for something that you don't believe in and then thinking any reply someone makes (even when they quote the person they are talking to) is about you.
Thread derailed once again.

 

Semantics, Turbo. What you can't quote, however, is me assuming something that is factual true, something I've been waiting for you to disprove.

 

As opposed to doing the work yourself and proving me right ?
As I said - you already have your mind made up - both of our times are being wasted replying back and forth.
But that's ok... the goose is safe as long as you refuse to look for it and others do.

 

I'm not sure what you guys are going on about, but yes, I was addressing Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone.

I do believe there's some merit to clocking and biased wheels. I'm less enthusiastic about wheel clocking in most cases. If possible, or I mean practical, because ya, I'm sure under the right conditions it's possible, but if its practical, I seriously think it's one of the holy grails of AP. Just getting it down to half the wheel would be incredible. That's why I'm skeptical in an actual casino setting. One with that skill would absolutely punish the casinos. You wouldn't even need to find that many opportunities. If I was and could do it I definitely wouldn't talk about it. Id much rather disseminate false information claiming it definitely isn't practical.

As I said I came across some opportunities where it seems logical that someone with legitimate skill could have a significant advantage.

 

What if I asked you..

What is this thread about?

 

I have zero problem doing all of the work for you, Turbo, just give me the source material to run off of. I'll prove you right or wrong, and we can stop talking about this nonsense before long.

That's what I'm saying, no proof has been shown in this thread, just some horseshit graph my nephew could make for me, showing a winner lol.

 

This thread was derailed by a common troll.
I'm sure it will either get back on track (cleaned up) or it won't.

 

I DID the work asshole - see ? that's how they address you in the other thread (your "intro"). I see why you are here and you succeeded in derailing a good topic and bashing people to entertain yourself.
And no - I won't give you shit. (see ? I'm using language that appeals to you). Figure it out yourself. I have posted more than enough info already.
I've been proven right - you are in no position to prove anything to anyone. As if anyone needs YOUR approval. What a big ego we have ? It must pass your judgement yet you said yourself that roulette isn't even your interest in a casino. Oddly you won't leave my topic alone. How are things with Gizmo working out ?
We are done talking about this "nonsense". You are wasting my time. That is one thing I refuse to let people do.
When you are gone I will return to posting and share with others to help them win - until then it's your show - enjoy.
Be happy I am not a mod or staff here - you are therefore allowed to annoy the shit out of people.
Just not me. Cheers.

 

I'm not sure, however out of everyone participating you're the least believable with the lamest excuses why you can't and won't show any proof.

I made you a legitimate generous offer and was willing to sign a NDA. Yet you had nothing but excuses and went on to attack me. I assume the attacking was a smoke screen because my offer was legitimate and your system isn't. That leads me and others to believe whatever you are hawking is a total rubbish SCAM.

 

These forums are getting the same level as a kindergarten. Been checking the others too...same sh!t . TG please carry on and ignore the rest. Some people are actually interested in what you share with us ..... I'm all ears

 

Excuse me?

I think you are mixing me up with someone else, because I don't hawk anything, I've never received an offer from you for anything with or without a NDA, I don't recall ever attacking you, and I've never mentioned any systems of mine on this forum, well not yet anyway.


As denzie said, some are interested so please carry on TG.

 

When I read that from Axel - my first thought was that Exoter logged in as Axel by mistake and posted that - meaning the comment was for me. I have no idea unless it's explained further.
I'll get back to this thread and topic though - thanks for the support.