Baccarat Why Banker is the wrong choice for progression play?

To what harm is there for the magician to reveal his knowledge if it is NOT for sale?

I simply cannot understand people who would withhold their knowledge if it could benefit others, if asked. Scholars teach people who wish to learn. Mentors mentor those who wish to learn and carry on the legacy.

If it is NOT for sale, why so tight with info or methods?

I don't want to be treated as a child but would like to learn. Hell, why would I ask when I could just follow them around a mimic their bets?

I would rather help and teach someone than have them follow me around like a dog or shadow...geez.

 

Do you know how zen teachers teach? They give
you a puzzle to figure out then ask you every
day for the answer. If you ever solve it, they
give you another one. No lectures, no classes.
They point, they don't instruct.

A magician gives nothing away because if he
did, everybody would be doing it.

 

And all anyone would have to do is follow exactly how these so called "winners" at baccarat and roulette do. Funny that nobody does because these games cannot be beaten by bet selections, period!

 

Except you don't know how they arrived at the decision to make a winning bet. You can watch them and write down when they bet, and keep track of all the outcomes. That still won't tell you why they bet when they do.

For instance, you may see him bet banker after 3 players in a row. You think, aha! Bet the opposite side when you see 3 in a row. Awhile later there are 3 bankers in a row and he bets banker. You think, oh no! What does this mean, why didn't he bet player?

You can't get inside his head by keeping track of his bets.

 

So there is no method, except random choice, if the same thing is not repeated? Tells me they don't know anything different than anyone else then. It is all speculation and guesswork given any certain moment.

 

Random choice doesn't work. Watch the average person playing roulette, all the do is play random choice and lose.

 

I agree that random choice does not work very well. Where I got confused is what you stated above.

If that person does not bet the same method/pattern each time, would that not be considered random then?

 

Probably not. He's more than likely has a system he's using, you just know what it is.

 

Gottcha! Thanks

 

I meant to say, you don't know what it is.

 

I was sure that was what you meant.

 

I know a polish guy who bets small units until its a favorable bet and also is low key, quiet and pretends to not know English but he has an uncanny ability to up the green, black and purple chips and cash in year after year. I know he intentionally sometimes looses small and he is always making money year after year. Boy what I would not give to be allowed to piggyback his betting. Piggybacking I allowed at some casinos some of the time by certain players to reach the table minimum or for those who cannot meet the minimum bet and denied to others why is that? Why is minimum piggybacking allowed more often to male players when females are gamming more and more? Why are certain players encouraged to piggyback and others denied? I wonder!

 

I know of one strategy that is 65% reliable over the short term of play and 150% successful over the longer term of play. I have read many forum posts and have never come across this strategy before, anywhere on the net. I came up with it myself. It works for a fifty fifty game like outside bets on roulette or baccarat better because you get you stake back on a tie where you only get half back on single zero roulette. With the latter you either have to cover the zero or take the hit when zero results. covering zero is pointless because you'll be losing over the long run whereas playing baccarat you don't need to worry about the zero. I discussed the strategy I came up with with a friend who was very pessimistic about systems in general observing that not many gamblers win over the long run. When I explained how simple by strategy was and how it works he was shocked and concluded that it must work. I put it to the test using him to help me witness what I had come up with and it did work. There are certain things you need, mostly condition, but can be arranged, organized, once set up you're good to go and can win every day. If you set a target to aim for i.e. not too many unit wins per day then you can increase your profits over time, over many weeks, months and can slowly increase your unit stake. You do not need to double up or add or double down etc, no risky business. Just flat betting involved. I've never known it to fail over the long run and the beauty of my strategy is that it is based upon one fundamental principle. Once you see this principle at work, though knowing it without trying it you will already more or less agree it will work, all you then need is to establish the conditions which as I wrote is pretty much easy to set up. Using this strategy you can forget the house edge because with the gains you'll make the house edge is neither here nor there. Winning is as easy as placing the bet and sitting back to watch your unit profits increase. In my opinion having read many books, and many forum posts about namely baccarat and or outside chances on roulette this idea I developed is a money tree. I really should be a multimillionaire just by using it. I'm planning to start using it very soon. All legal, no cheating just basic common sense and the power of knowing that most of the bets you place will be winners. I know that there will be though that will be skeptical but I also know that even the most skeptical people out there will admit that this strategy not only will work but is the absolute system of all systems ever devised to beat the game of baccarat.

 

Yes sticking to one side is a bad idea that will end in disaster.change with the trend I say and don't bet every round!!