Roulette Why is the average Interval 7.3 spins in relation to a single number becoming a Repeater ?

whats the progression after 9?

 

26,000 spins or roughly 4 months of spinning (wiesbaden)

Breakdown

1 101
2 160
3 210
4 252
5 307
6 331
7 308
8 286
9 303
10 223
11 160
12 124
13 97
14 66
15 46
16 29
17 21
18 4
19 6
20 4
21 1
22 1
23 1

3041

7,32 single spins becoming a Repeater

Not a Holy grail, but apparently the winning streaks are higher than the losing

200 euro bet

6 to 10 --- 7.2 k of Profit... 33% of waiting
7 to 10----- 9.5 k of profit-- 45% of waiting
8 to 10-----10.4 of profit----55% of waiting
9 to 10-----11.9 k of profit---64% of waiting

5 to 9 ------6.8 k of profit--- 24% of waiting

 

I have actually simulated this with random numbers and a BASIC program.
Yes there can be a lot of waiting.
So you are saying that you can profit, and that playing 9 then 10 numbers gives the highest profit?

 

in % in %
actual theor
4--- 9,8 10,8
5 -----13,5 13,5
6-- 16,3 16,2
7-- 18,7 18,9
8-- 21,1 21,6
9-- 27,3 24,3
10- 28,6 27,0

 

Irish 88
Do you remember topic GzGzbee at RF. With 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-16-18-30 or 1-1-1-1-1-1-1-2-2-3

 

Hi Notto,

I could not find the topic unfortunately. I remember him and used to post about mainly playing repeaters.

 

Yes it was about betting the 1st 10 spins.
The topic is on page 8 bet selection.
The 11th spin gave another non-hit quite often.
It's a vaddi bet, that we know don't cut-it. How often is Winkels 2 repeats by 13th spin, where spins 12-13 are the repeats.
Huskerdu- says he often see's only 1 repeat in 20 spins, is that repeat 1 in spins 11-20?

 

1 105
2 170
3 225
4 268
5 330
6 347
7 337
8 312
9 313
10 238
11 170
12 134
13 104
14 68
15 48
16 30
17 24
18 4
19 6
20 4
21 1
22 1
23 1

3240

 

6 to 10 ----- 9.3 k
7 to 10 -----10.6 k
8 to 10------10.4 k
9 to 10-------11.0k

 

1 to 10 ------ 6.2 k of Profit

4.5 to 1

82%

Playing always

 

Look at zero if following your average of 7, same of #29 as said sometimes only 5#'s
53 spins at 60 spins average is 30 repeats. 30 of the starting 37 usually hit by spin 60; with 7 spins to come only 3 need to be non-hit
We'll never know. But following last 7 spins??

 

So when you say 9 to 10….. you play the last 9 numbers, then if it loses you play the last 10? Then if that loses you go back to the last 9?

 

I have long suspected that Vaddi used Luck Of the Irish information to supposedly build his method around.

 

Flat bet on last 7 spins

 

Very interesting and simple.

 

If you know of Vaddi bet and the magic number, let's assume it's 8. It doesn't win, like 7, you'll meet the part of the stream that catch's the bet out.
You'd be better of zig-zagging on red and black.

If you know of average for repeat these 17 spins are on track. At 20 spins average for repeat is 4.
But, could you zig-zag on 2 columns?

+100 zig-zagging on columns 2-3/3-2.


Quicker win than last 7

 

Well 20 spins

Must have Dr Sir, the top GLOAT's crystal ball.

 

Following 7 would be a waste of time.
Zag-zag 10% on bank-roll.

 

So, what of the average for repeats over 60 spins. Usually 1-3-5-7&30.
At 30 spins. The 1/37 stream is fair. 9 repeats. But zig-zagging don't care about average.

At 40 spins -1 on the 16 repeats.


What does this stream give at 60 spins?
Remember 1-3-5-7&30/60; 30repeats and 30 of the starting 37



Now you see the average is either spot on or +/-1, 2
On occassions you might see +/- 4

Can you follow the stream that Dr Sir can't even if its called the TROT.
You can bet for uniques or repeat

 

Naughty but nice: I don´t know if I have got it right. But zig-zagging reminds me of what used to be called Intermittenzen in old German roulette books. RBRBRB is exactly as likely to come as RRRRRR.
But if you beg for a single number repeat within a series, the number of bets differ.
So if you bet on Red and the numbers appearing in the present Red sequence, the appearing numbers would be one, two, three and so forth.
Within a intermittence (zig-zagging) pattern it would be one, one, two, two and so on and so forth.