Roulette Why is the average Interval 7.3 spins in relation to a single number becoming a Repeater ?

Hi,

I can confirm your results for RNG (Excel), tested 12 spins a couple of 1000 times, in about 14% there was no hit, for the rest the 7,3 is accurate. Given the almost identical numbers I unfortunately wasn't able to reproduce your positive results with said progression (wait 1- 6, play 1, 2 3, 5, 10 with a max loss of 210 and a max profit of 150). In about 500 tests the results fluctuated around -3000 units with a win rate of about 70% give or take.

I then repeated the test with some (supposingly) live spins I took off some site and the results were again in the same ballpark.

Any ideas?
T4712

PS: Pls Naughty or Notto or whatever your name is - no more confusing charts. Thank you.

 

Trans
Yes you must be confused
Admin forget

 

With a win rate of about 70% give or take.

With that Percentage, you must be positive.

the Theoretical Probability = 64,8%

Received the outcome of 1 milj Rng results from Naughty
of course it was negative.

These are Spins from Wiesbaden, I tested.

 

Then something is wrong, either with my calculation or the progression I am using.
A = spun number,
B = Hit or not,
C = Gross profit if any,
F = cost accumulated (7*1, 7*1 + 8*2 ...),
G = Profit - Cost,
H = Result (in case there were 2 hits I stop after the first).

thx & rgds
T4712

 

the 19th is a an eleven, so a loss... not a ten

 

I am afraid it's not getting any better. I took out the additional line as you mentioned (now 11 bets, same progression) and the results are around 30.000 loss for app. 1600 sessions. Actually it fluctuates between -18.000 and -40.000. Winning sessions are around 66 to 68%.

Average no of units per win 65 - 70, per loss obviously 210.

Again my question if I may: Is it my calculation / progression that makes this enormous difference between your results and mine????

thx & rgds
T4712

 

SESSIONS
WAITING 1 TO 6 2835
WINNING 7 689 58 39962
WINNING 8 620 70 43400
WINNING 9 616 178 109648
WINNING 10 478 150 71700
67,5 % 2403 264710
LOSING 11 TO 23 1156 -210 -242760
TOTAL 6394 21950 Profit

 

OK, seems like a parallel universe but so be it.

Let's try it differently: Here are 11 numbers, Would you mind showing me your result? Thank you in advance.

2
21
7
26
21
19
23
12
20
23
21

 

2
starter
21
7
26
21 4 waiting no bet 1 to 6
19 starter
23
12
20
23 4 waiting no bet 1 to 6
21 starter

 

This IS a parallel universe. But thanks anyway. I am out of here.

 

gee, is it really so difficult...

the weighted average is 7.3 spins to become a repeater, but because of his Randomness, it can fluctuate from 1 spin to 24 spins.

If you start to quick with betting, you will lose certainly.

I only bet after the starter and 7 spins.

an example:

1 8 starter

2 5
3 24
4 26
5 27
6 28
7 33 next spin start betting.......8-5-24-26-27-28-33
8 8 win

 

if not start betting 8 numbers , if not start betting 9 numbers, if not start betting 19 numbers

if not you lose 210 units, wait for the session has been finished, example a 17 (numbers
start over again

the same for the sessions ending too quick,, Starter and 1 to 6 spins.. there it's only waiting

1 8 starter
2 8

1 9 starter
2 5
3 9

1 12 starter
2 5
3 6
4 12

1 13 starter
2 4
3 5
4 6
5 5

1 24 starter
2 1
3 36
4 33
5 5
6 36

1 36 starter
2 2
3 4
4 7
5 28
6 18
7 18

 

This is the exact way I was doing it if you look at my Excel sample further up. Where you said I was wrong...

However, as I said I am ending this conversation, thanks for your patience and all the best.

T4712

 

your exanple:

1 starter 21
2 19
3 26
4 24
5 23
6 10
7 15

8 20 losing first try
9 35 losing second try
10 28 losing third try
11 34 losing fourth try

I accept my loss -210

all over again

1 19