Roulette Winning millions on roulette

this is one of the funniest posts ever---we are arguing over nothing... who really cares about how someone does in play mode on a phone?

 

@TurboGenius
Why are you getting frustrated over this? Even if I post my real winnings that won't be yours. If you can't stand that move to other topics.
Please do not show me links from wikipedia. I have edited wikipedia in many topics with references worth not denying. Pseudo RNG is not perfect random but it is not so easy to utilize that to win in an app. Nowadays, even cryptographically secure PRNGs are there( which may be an alien thing for you Turbo).
If you ever wish to learn more about randomness and specially PRNG, refer to this topic from Harvard University: http://people.seas.harvard.edu/~salil/pseudorandomness/prgs.pdf
Come over from the childish knowledge that you have acquired from silly gambling forums. I give you a PRNG coded in excel, try to beat it in a week or month and then come to argue back. Choose any PRNG game for that matter and prove that it is beatable so easily.

 

Yes, it's meaningless. Real results are all that matters, from a real casino where you bet with real money.

 

Agreed lol.
We haven't had a update since the $100,000,000.00 image. I wonder how many trillions he's up to now ?

 

Over 300 millions. Posted it way back but site had issues and it got deleted with many posts. Over 10,000x of initial bankroll.

 

Are you sure it's not 300 billion? Just as
useless as 300 million or even 3 cents.

 

Why don't you fuck off here if it is causing you burning down there to see?

 

LOL.... you struck a nerve EKAPS - he needs people to post how impressed they are with his amazing amount of pretend - fake bankroll.
(Yet "we" are the ones who need the psychiatrists. how odd)

 

LOL
Why is OP so furious? Is he really trying to imply that he has "something amazing that makes millions and millions of $"?
Because if he does, showing a screenshot of an android app in play money mode is a very naive way of claiming this.

 

I do not need to pretend or tell stories, I show. If it is so easy to win in a large simulation, try to do the same. It is fun money, even if I win real millions it won't affect you, so enjoy it but do not cry. Archie Kara won millions from 10k borrowed money, did it make you rich? Novak Djokovic won Wimbledon, you got his trophy?
Even newbie kids started to bark? Maybe a shadow of yours.

 

Uh, wouldn't that type of language get you banned from your own forum based on your own rules?

It's a rhetorical question.

Idpa

 

It's called "Spend 1/2 of the time posting miraculous winnings" and then "Spend the other half of the time bashing anyone who claims to be able to win".
And through it all - "we" are the ones who need psychiatric help...
Lucky for us all there is a "ignore" button available.

 

Lol. Forum fallacy mongers are on the prowl. Men with patterns and predictions are here to preach. I can see suddenly some new accounts started barking on me in the very first posts. Suckers are putting only comments and criticism without any positive post. Old trick.

 

That's the albalaha we all know from "previous" forums.

Always defensive with pretty much nothing to contribute. Sound familar?

"New" accounts are not "barking" on you. They are merely continuing to comment on your bland and neutral discussions which generally produce nothing of value.

However, you do get to see your name at the top of the page, which seems to be very important to you.

I'll be posting up my 50 million in winnings (play money) on keno and bingo shortly.

Idpa

 

Actually, fallacy mongers crew is getting frustrated to see me bashing their "out of box idiocity". Those who are getting depth of discussions, put "likes" on them, other say, although they have none, actually they are the contributors. Another kind of fallacy, they seem to enjoy.
Suckers see that my debates are logical and they do not have any sensible thing to talk about so they come up with cheap talks.

Show anything you wish but opt another fresh topic. In another topic, one of the leaders of the crew of fallacy mongers says, "I contributed so much unique idea in this post of mine, yet there are only 3 views". So they prefer to suck around my topics to be viewed, at least.

 

Whatever.

 

It's complex math to figure out but since he "likes" the likes so much and think it means something...
434 posts with only 34 "likes" 7.8% of your posts are worth a 'like' from anyone.
Me - (who he's talking about when he says "one of the leaders of the crew of fallacy mongers"
106 posts (1/4) with 22 "likes" (how is that possible.. oh, because 75% of your posts are meaningless garbage to hear yourself speaking but no one else cares) Do the simple math and figure it out.
(I'll give you a hint, it's not even in the same ballpark)

"Visit my blog" he says also in every post - so visit it !
66 users (nothing for a man who needs such a big following !!!) How dare there isn't at least 2,000 people there.
My "free site" where I gave away and explained every system and idea, along with explanations - testing results and examples, etc.... ?
163,869 visitors (as of way back in late 2014 lol)
I know it's not 66 but it's a start Albalaha if you think popularity means anything.
Google TurboGenius Roulette and you'll see 1,570 results..
"Albalaha Roulette" will give you 4.
As I said before, make posts that are important to people (not like this one of mine, which is honestly a waste of my time and everyone's who reads it.)
and people will learn something from you - aside from that... your just the loud and disruptive kid in the classroom
who thinks he's smarter than the teacher and probably won't even graduate.
"Spreading awareness and suppressing fallacies relating to casino gambling."
You are not ! No one is becoming more "aware" by your posts, you are suppressing nothing - aside from people not posting here WHO WOULD if they didn't have to wonder about being knocked down by your useless comments every time they brought up an idea that they thought had merit.
Yet (like I said before) - here you are - waiting for something to be posted that you can use yourself.
(and... grins...."I contributed so much unique idea in this post of mine, yet there are only 3 views" which you
put in quotes and I did not say (quotes are for quoting people, not for putting what you want there and saying someone else said it...please refrain from quoting me without it being an actual quote))
But I digress, "you" were one of the people who viewed the thread (grins). So you're reading every word I post, thank you for your attention... stick around and you'll learn something.

 

It's so dag gum hard to collect your money when you win on them free ware games on the indernet!

 

This man seems to really need help of psychiatrist and opthamologist both. He had 163,869 visitors only and jumping here and there while I have 279,247 views so far while for about 1 and half years it was a hidden forum and contents were viewable only to a limited group of people that were persoally invited to be a part of the community. Later the forum opened for all as a blog of mine and no more memberships being given. 66 users here means 66 members not visitors as may look to the moron person.
Turbo forum was only a compilation of "proven failure" systems. I emphasized upon exclusive debates and researches that other forums shy to talk of on my forum/blog. Talking of mindless "systems" or progressions were not allowed at my place that are already branded as useless. Atleast 6 members of my forum were admins of other big forums on gambling. I tried to create a "league of extraordinary gentlemen" as a hidden group while when it did not work as expected, opened it for all. There is absolutely no comparison between a compiler of fallacy laden systems and an analyst or researcher.
Any sane man can compare the two and understand who has the depth.

 

this conversation is useless and so is the albalaha commentator he is known as as a one of the the worlds most shyster liars.--well known!