Roulette You can't beat the math, or can you?

Wow, shit eating idiot to command post commander. That must be a new record. What else do you want for Christmas?

 

Its this condescending attitude that make people hate this guy ^

8 years strong at least on these forums doing the same thing

There's no roulette red cross. So my assumption is he either has daddy issues or does it for the jollies (likes pretending to be on a pedestal because he made a life of cheating roulette due to wheel flaws)

This type of condescending attitude and behavior definitely comes from his own inner issues

Maybe 3 fries short of a happy meal

He doesn't respect people who play differently then him. So show him the same respect. Instead of just posting in the AP side he uses his time to make himself feel better by doing......this.

99 percent of his forum interactions are negative. If everyone ignored this homunculus that would be affective. Skip his post as if its not there.

 

Giz,

You're mind is trapped in the box that is the gambler's fallacy.

 

404 error. Been used 3 million times.

He is having a hillary malfunction. Repeat. Repeat. Broken record.

 

Hes just a little sick in the head guys

____________

Belittling, Condescending and Patronizing - This kind of speech is a passive-aggressive approach to giving someone a verbal put-down while maintaining a facade of reasonableness or friendliness.

Masked Nastiness

Many people with Personality Disorders suffer from low self-esteem and look for ways to feel better. One way some of them try to do that is by putting others down using Belittling, Condescending and Patronizing speech.

 

Here's your mathematical proof that I can teach a computer to recognize sleepers. You know, those things that don't predict the future.

Code:

on checkSleeper thisSet1, thisSet2, thisSet3
   global var1Xo, var2Xo, var3Xo
   put item 27 to 30 of thisSet1 into smallSet1
   put item 27 to 30 of thisSet2 into smallSet2
   put item 27 to 30 of thisSet3 into smallSet3

   put item 4 of smallSet1 into X11
   put item 4 of smallSet2 into X12
   put item 4 of smallSet3 into X13
   put item 3 of smallSet1 into X21
   put item 3 of smallSet2 into X22
   put item 3 of smallSet3 into X23
   put item 2 of smallSet1 into X31
   put item 2 of smallSet2 into X32
   put item 2 of smallSet3 into X33
   put item 1 of smallSet1 into X41
   put item 1 of smallSet2 into X42
   put item 1 of smallSet3 into X43
  
   if X11 = "X" then
      put 0 into var1Xo
   end if
   if  X11 = "o" then
      put 1 into var1Xo
   end if
   if X21 = "o" then
      put 2 into var1Xo
   end if
   if X31 = "o" then
      put 3 into var1Xo
   end if
   if X41 = "o" then
      put 4 into var1Xo
   end if
  
   if X12 = "X" then
      put 0 into var2Xo
   end if
   if  X12 = "o" then
      put 1 into var2Xo
   end if
   if  X22 = "o" then
      put 2 into var2Xo
   end if
   if X32 = "o" then
      put 3 into var2Xo
   end if
   if X42 = "o" then
      put 4 into var2Xo
   end if
  
  
   if X13 = "X" then
      put 0 into var3Xo
   end if
   if  X13 = "o" then
      put 1 into var3Xo
   end if
   if  X23 = "o" then
      put 2 into var3Xo
   end if
   if X33 = "o" then
      put 3 into var3Xo
   end if
   if X43 = "o" then
      put 4 into var3Xo
   end if
   
   put  smallSet1 & return into zap2
   put  smallSet2 & return after zap2
   put  smallSet3 & return after zap2
   put  X11 & return after zap2
   put  X12 & return after zap2
   put  X13 & return after zap2
   put  X21 & return after zap2
   put  X22 & return after zap2
   put  X23 & return after zap2
   put  X31 & return after zap2
   put  X32 & return after zap2
   put  X33 & return after zap2
   put  X41 & return after zap2
   put  X42 & return after zap2
   put  X43 & return after zap2
   answer zap2
end checkSleeper

That's a reusable function so that I can pass several groups to it without having to hard code it. Just imagine a computer seeing and acting on the most likely, mathematically speaking that is, the most likely trend to continue based on conditional deduction and not on magic.

 

Gizmo

He already knows the next thing he is going to say without even reading that

Im afraid with a person like this you are wasting your time attempting to explain

Better off ignoring....

 

Here's proof that your code is worthless.

 

I knew it was that dickhead, Snowman from GG. Evidence this: "he made a life of cheating roulette due to wheel flaws"

I fucked him up there and now I have him cornered here too. He will never admit he is wrong. He will always run and hide when confronted. He will never answer a coherent argument that shows he refuses to listen. He's the best chicken man on the gambling forums. He destroyed GG.

You are right. Box him in. Ignore the troll.

 

Thats the point. Refuses to listen

Best to skip over the posts

 

Giz,

You have yet to present a coherent argument. All you've presented so far is a fool's folly.

 

Funny, I just changed the function a little and I'm now rewarded with the working solution, I need to nest the conditions. I was getting tired and couldn't see it until I read it here on the forum. Cool, solution resolution, thanks snowman. You just helped me show you up.

That's your mother, right troll.

 

Your blog and contributions make forums actual forums

This junk^ is just a distraction from a "man" who obviously "needs to be heard"

 

So which of your bull sh$t terms led to the working solution?

Was it:
1. "The elegant pattern"?
2. Your "visual dexterity to see trends fast"?
3. "Reading randomness," perhaps?
4. The "effectiveness state"?
5. Was it the "global effect"?
6. How about "the ebb and flow"?

 

We called him snow shit for no shit, the master of stating the obvious.

 

All. The. Time.

 

RouletteGhost,

Giz is not capable of articulating his position. Can you perhaps explain why you feel that he's not just another scamming kook?

 

All of the above excluding number six, i guess "the ebb and flow" is your sophistry, jerk in the box. Imagine all those considerations by a computer having first passed a valuation of risk component to make bet selection decisions from. That's including the logic behind a trend not existing too. You can't ignore a trend that continues.

 

Ok...

Let's try this one more time. If the number of pockets on the wheel remains the same from one spin to the next, then how could the odds of winning change on the next series of spins because of what has hit on the previous spins? What are the physics behind this change in probability?

 

Stupid fuck.

Did you see the news snowshit? ‘Smart’ Dildo Company Sued For Tracking Users’ Habits:
http://www.vocativ.com/358530/smart-dildo-company-sued-for-tracking-users-habits/

We've known you were a smart dildo for decades.