Roulette Your prediction about "Roulette systems" in the next 20 years?

i understand your point of view Jerome and of course you're more likely to be right... But i think i cannot be 100% closed to precognition as i am with systems.

Number 3

 

For some reason I sense "19".
If we assume there is no trickery involved, and there is a single digit number behind the box. I assume it is something that more or less resembles a stick or number 1. The following digit is 9, hence 19.

 

would you be OK to test 50/100 attempts?

 

Such a task is not good, because it has many answers. So is like if we need to know some information accordingly which rule numbers are written.

You like horses and races - so here is for you simple task from Chinese secondary school and not from the high class.

Are 25 horses. You can do competitions in which run 5 horses. You do not have a timer or another clock so you can fix only in which place between 5 came which horse.
Question - how many races you need a minimum, that to detect the fastest 3 horses from 25? The solution is only one and in it is used pure math...

 

Mrclown is waiting for me to answer his silly test just so he can change the answer, and pretend like that is proof against precognition.

I am not interested in playing those silly games.

Precognition has already been demonstrated on MPR and roulette simulator.

The fact these zombies are so desperate to debunk the reality of precognition shows who the real fanatics are.

If you ask humbly about precognition and the techniques I am happy to help. But if you arrogantly assume precognition isn't real I will arrogantly dismiss you as being ignorant, which is exactly what you are.

 

A four leaf clover , a rabbits foot and a horse shoe should comp;ate a gamblers fallacy in 20 years .

 

Indeed. That's the most likely scenario. Even then if you make a correct "guess" and it happen to coincide with his box he will be pissed, so that is why made a guess based on my coincidence method.

I do not need to prove to anyone that it works, I already did that to myself.

Most sceptics falsly assume that unless you correct all the time, your method is rubbish.
When in reality even if you have a small edge over the statistical expectation you can make a good profit.

 

But it is normal if 100 precogers try it that few ones will be ahead according to the gauss curve. Then it's not valid to use those people who are ahead as a proof to claim it works...

I did but obviously i'm not gonna try everything i find on google... Explain it here, i'll give it a try and make a fair report.
Of course i do not expect to be right all the time, but i could make before i start a 100 random bet and compare when i use what you describe.

 

You set yourself up for failure (or success depends on how you look at it) even without realizing before even starting the experiment by saying you will compare it to 100 random bets.

It tells me that you don't believe in it to work, so that is why the inner need for the outside validation.
As I suggested you create your own subjective reality based on your inner believes either conscious or unconscious.
Basically you are in a closed box looking for proof, yet you crave to find something that is outside the box. Good luck with that.
Still it is a good start, at least you are open minded.
The problem is the lack of awareness.

As I said cultivating this inner knowingness is a gradual process of self-efficacy.

 

Confirmation bias leads to bad research. But best of all it leads to the support of casino's bottom lines. What's more important here. Is having the skill and telling others more important than proving it? All I see is recruitment. There is a mindset force fed into children minds ever since it was started back in elementary schools back in 1985. This is a new axiom that there is no absolute truth. All notions are a form of truth. Real truth is just a weapon used by the establishment to remain in power. Subjective truth is the new normal. You must accept this notion of diverse truth in order to achieve social justice. If you want to change society you must lie to it. People must learn to like being lied to.

This capability of a sixth sense is as old as the millennium of ages of mankind. It was held in higher regard in long ago times past. It's trying to make a comeback. But in the era of subjective truth it has a better chance. People so badly seeking justification for subjective beliefs are a new kind of victimization. It's more important to have acceptance than it is to find the objective truth. So precognition is real to those that need it to be real. If you disagree then you are not a genuine justice seeking member of social justice. You will be excluded from main stream acceptance. You do not belong to the enlightened masses. And that is the primary goal because the primary goal is to overcome the establishment.

 

If you try something unusual at guessing it don't make you automatically an accomplished psychic.
Like most thing in this physical plane it comes with time and experience and knowingness.

You need to have well developed energy centers and direct unobstructed flow of your energy concentrated in your third energy center, which is a result of the correct attitudes and positive expanded believes brought to the light of consciousness and being internalized.
Some have cultivated this experience over past lives, so we can say they are gifted in this area.

 

To be honest - Kairomancer made a very good guess and good enough that I would say a second test is important.
Precog won't even attempt it. Strange.
There's still time. You should be able to know what is there.
I can redo if you like and send admin the answer since you actually think that I would say your wrong if you got it right.
Kudos to Kairomancer for an interesting guess. You'll see why when I reveal it.
Go precog Go...take a shot at it

 

Skeptic is not only being negative, it's only put our opinions on side and analyse the facts. Fact here is that random can perform for a moment, systems also can be under positive variance... That's why they believe actually in their systems.
We can't ignore that fact and at a moment we have to compare.
That's not in order to deny but to find a way to prove. I think it worth better than spending time into systems where there is nothing to expect.

 

!

 

Yet, I think it is a fun way to engage with others and learn something in the process as long as you enjoy doing it.
They ask valid questions. To answer those takes wisdom and obviously psychic channeling of my Higher Mind or Inner God.

I have to admit sometimes I have no clue, but I focus at the question with the intent of knowingness then I proceed with the answering. Just like with roulette numbers.

I do not pretend to knowing it all, but I DO have valuable and transcendental experiences and part of my journey is to share them with others.

I try my best to answer the interesting questions in this topic.
Though it takes me some time, as the militant counter reactions can be overwhelming and I have to use my old smartphone to answer those large wall of texts, as my PC is not working at the moment.

 

I would say it is Number 5

 

Thanks, but I am not interested in further tests to fail at.
I see it like a spice of life, just a little can enhance your food, too much of it tend to ruin the mistery.
If you think this is just a coincidence then I proved my point, as we willingly co-induced it just at the right moment to push you further in a new field of discovery.

 

That is a great point. Precognition is useful even if it gives you a slight edge in roulette. But, from my experience it completely over turns the house edge.

 

Mrclown I am not going to do your little challenge, so don't hold your breath.