Misc The VCT Thread!

The UNKewl one produces nothing because he has nothing.

There simply aren’t reams of documents available to establish the sort of thing the UNKewl one is trying to prove, and even if there were, there’s no way they’d be carried over to hand over to some lowlife nickel level blackjack loser in his low end condo. The UNKewl one doesn't even have any friends, let alone friends in high places.

In any case the made up number the UNKewl one posted has nothing to do with my numbers so it’s all hogwash.

As if anyone thought that anything the UNKewl one would whine about (in his high pitched voice) would ever amount to anything.... This isn't the first time he's claimed this or that over the years and never produced a scrap of proof. All talk. All whiny voiced high pitched talk, actually.


Like the UnKewl one said to the attorney:

UNKewl one (sulking, voice rising to a falsetto whine): I'm the victim here! I'm always the victim! People are always out to get me! I knew you wouldn't understand.

Anyway, he'll be back. To post more. About MDAWG!

 

I've called the police and the alleged complex you say you reside. They've never heard of me. No police report. KJ is monstrous a liar just as many APs have stated.

Time to bring back Blackhole and his violin music.

 

I only stopped in since it's early in the AM and not much else is going on. I'll stop back to see your response, but I'm probably not sticking around for long.

Anyways, would you be willing to show your evidence to someome who won't post or share that evidence with anyone? They will just confirm if the evidence is saying what you are claiming it says. I'm suggesting someone unbiased with a good reputation who has no reason to choose a side. Let's say someone like Richard Munchkin.

True or not, If you are not willing to do that, then I have to agree it's just meaningless as all the other unsubstantiated claims are being made on all the forums.

 

Absolutely.

 

If Munchkin is interested, I would like to see him interview MDawg on GWAE. He would ask the questions that MDawg had no answer for.

 

Kj writes; Who said I am producing anything? I didn't. I don't even have nor never had the police report. I saw it. But it didn't involve me. It was not me that filed the complaint therefore I was not entitled to the report. They showed it to me, that was all. I suggest you contact the police or building management who filed the complaint.


Tater says: Axel. In my case. YES. KJ initially said the information found on an alleged police report was how he determined I was living off government benefits, homeless, on meds, betting $10 a game, and a red chip play.

I have given my real name and informed readers Fast People is a free internet search.ive spoken to properties I own and have owned listed on that search. Now, KJ claims he only saw the report. So I ask you Axel. What has KJ provided other than lies and false accusations?

 

Why not Mission 146?

He's easy to contact, and may be available to review the evidence immediately.

 

No, I like the Munchkin suggestion and my idea that it be tied to an interview on GWAE, if Munchkin is interested.

I always say "it doesn't take much to figure out who knows what they are talking about and who is just talking". These interviews, like the one Shackleford did with Singer last year can go a long way towards that. Someone with good writing skills and time to come up with an answer can BS their way through a lot on a forum (as this Mdawg person has), but put them in a spur of the moment interview situation with a knowledgeable person asking the questions and they had better know what they are talking about or they will be exposed. (a la Singer in the Shackleford interview)

Tying it to a Munchkin interview will allow every person to be part of that jury and decide for themselves rather than having one person like Mission, or even Munchkin or someone else chosen, decide for them.

 

You gotta understand, this UNKewl one is a mentally ill, pathological liar. His mood changes from day to day. He's probably still on a manic run since Monday morning. He has nothing to produce other than the product of psychosis in his brain. There are bits of uneducated neurons bouncing around in his head that are driving him to say more and more nonsense. Somehow, those neurons are all tied to one subject: MDAWG!

At the end of the day, he will produce nothing, because he has nothing.

 

I'm not sure (ahem) why coach would suggest Mission.

1) Mission was a WoV mod, therefore his reputation has been tied to WoV, as has his credibility. Why choose someone with motive to support WoV and no motive to rip WoV and MDawg to shreds?
2) Mission currently derives some kind of income from WoV-related sources. Why choose someone with motive to support WoV? Why choose someone with no motive to rip WoV and MDawg to shreads?
3) Mission has already posted what I consider (and I've been debunking gambling claims for 40 years) contortionist defenses of WoV's attitude and policies regarding MDawg. Why choose someone who has already defended WoV and Mdawg? Why not choose a virgin, neutral party?

Of course, these are rhetorical questions. Coach suggested Mission because coach has no interest in putting MDawg in an objective spotlight.

Good try, coach. Not subtle, though, even by your standards.

 

I I would have had no objection to Mission. I always found him to be a mostly fair and objective. However redietz's point #2, really does disqualify Mission from consideration.

I would have had no objection to Axelwolf himself, who made the proposal. I would have an objection to Shackleford. He has proven to be very biased, if not a part of this. I would have had no objection to Dan Druff, although he seems to have no or little interest in this "case".

But with the Munchkin suggestion, I really like that for reasons already stated.

 

I find Mission to be as objective as his position permits, which from my point of view isn't very.

However, coach belly could always test Mission's objectiveness by asking Mission that if Mission were looking for an objective MDawg evaluation, who would Mission designate -- himself or Munchkin?

I think Mission's answer will likely bury coach's idea six fathoms down.

Coach, you really need to start thinking two plays ahead.

 

Mission is objective when reviewing information, plus he's easily accessible and would provide an expeditious analysis of tewlj's documents.

It's unclear how his review of the Cosmo documents could defend or support WOV.

The GWAE proposal is clearly a tactic designed to prevent info disclosure, as it requires negotiation regarding MDawg's participation.

Forwarding the info to Mission for his review doesn't involve MDawg, so that could happen today.

 

I would expect Mission to consider himself as objective as anyone else in this regard.

His answer would be a function of his desire to participate.

The GWAE proposal complicates the logistics, but what's the objection to evaluations by both Mission and Munchkin?[/QUOTE]

 

Nope Mission is out because of his association with WoV on a situation that Shackleford in my opinion is a part of. If not "a part of" at the very least has demonstrated extreme bias.

If it is unclear to you how Missions participation could be seen as non objective, then you are really an idiot.

Let's just ask Mdawg, who is trying to send cryptic messages with his links to songs. Mdawg would you participate in an interview on GWAE? I mean you have been so eager to tell this great "story" on numerous forums. Here is a whole new platform for you.

I have to head out to an appointment so am not going to be able to go back and forth on this for hours. I will be back to further discuss later this afternoon / evening.

 

There have been multiple anonymous guests that have good reasons to protect their identity on GWAE over the years. Has anyone ever heard of Richard or Bob outing anyone? I seriously doubt it and Richard especially is well respected to my knowledge.

The question is would MDawg be interested in telling his story on the show because he would be the perfect guest for them. And I’m sure it would be easy for him to ensure legally he is protected.

But whatever we think really don’t matter, it will all be on MDawg. Seems like an opportunity for him to prove KJ is exactly what he claims. Until he weighs in it’s really pointless for us to even speculate but the safe money is like all this stuff, nothing ever happens.

 

Why doesn't the UNKewl one send them to ME? What's the difference, if he really has them once he sends them to a known public figure like Munchkin he might as well give them to me, because they will be effectively published.

Why? because he doesn't have anything to produce.

If you want to waste time with a mentally ill manic depressive, have at it. One day he wakes up blazing in mania and spews one form of nonsense, the next day, another.

What he is going to do is to try to tie his sending of the documents to something or other, and end up producing nothing. None of this is based on anything real, I already know that based on a number of facts I know about this loser, including that the number he posted has nothing to do with me.

His blackjack low end career will come to a crashing end within a period of time, that I can predict with relative certainty. Only because too many people know who he is, where he is, where he goes on a regular basis, and despise him. The only hope he has there is that people decide that he's not worth the effort and decide to leave him alone.

 

The discussion is about tewlj proving what he has claimed about MDawg's play at Cosmo.

MDawg doesn't need to participate in that exercise, and any requirement that MD must participate is a dodge.

The opportunity exists to have the documents reviewed immediately.

tewlj's GWAE interview proposal is beyond the scope of reviewing any documents in tewlj's possession, and is an unlikely event at best.

It's clear that tewlj is stalling...he has nothing on MDawg.

 

Who didn't know Mdawg would respond with a post attacking and threatening me (and my career)??

I think I am trying to be fair here, giving Mdawg the opportunity to further tell his story, which is obviously something he desires, since he has posted this nonsense on 4 forums for many months now.

Mdawg, you play rated! So you are NOT anonymous. Not to the casinos and that is what matters. As a matter of fact, you want to be known to the casinos, go out of your way to be known because you are trying and very likely succeeding in manipulating comps in your favor. You the only place you need the protection of anonymity is on the forums, and ONLY so people can't look into your claims for themselves.

Anyway, among your attacks and threats, what we didn't see is an answer to the question. Would you be willing to interview with Munchkin on GWAE.

Note: The Admins have pointed out that Munchkin is a founding member here, although he doesn't seem to participate.