Lounge Hillary 2016

I was also promoted 3 times to E4 rank before even leaving Basic Training.......
Must be a smart fella huh.... Oh wait, I'm bragging again - it's bad to do that.

 

lol - for someone with no horse in the race, you SURE commented lots in this thread. If I had time, I'd count - but it's LOTS... but you don't care who wins really.....
(that's what people say when they are losing or ready to lose) ie. "I didn't want to win anyway" or "I'm glad that other person won" or "It doesn't matter who wins - they are both corrupt !!!" lol. There's a huge list of things to say after a defeat. 10 days (?) to go ! Watch how the entire world improves. I won't even say "I told ya so".

 

I thought your debt was close to 18 TRILLION. Blame the neo-cons for that, and the bogus war in Iraq, but as a super-power, you need something going on in order to function right.

On Clinton Emails, Did the F.B.I. Director Abuse His Power?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/o...ils-did-the-fbi-director-abuse-his-power.html

I comment a lot because whoever wins, is the leader of the Free World, LOL, dragging all and sundry in whatever direction it chooses to go. How much egg can you fit on your face come election day? Will you frit away from the cyber-world head shaking in embarrassment like you have done so in the past?

 

Nar, I find that impossible to believe, you are lying, just lie you lied about making a million dollars in May some years ago. Utter delusional, big mind game player.


The F.B.I. is currently investigating the hacking of Americans’ computers by foreign governments. Russia is a prime suspect.

Imagine a possible connection between a candidate for president in the United States and the Russian computer hacking. Imagine the candidate has business dealings in Russia, and has publicly encouraged the Russians to hack the email of his opponent and her associates.

It would not be surprising for the F.B.I. to include this candidate and his campaign staff in its confidential investigation of Russian computer hacking.

But it would be highly improper, and an abuse of power, for the F.B.I. to conduct such an investigation in the public eye, particularly on the eve of the election. It would be an abuse of power for the director of the F.B.I., absent compelling circumstances, to notify members of Congress from the party opposing the candidate that the candidate or his associates were under investigation. It would be an abuse of power if F.B.I. agents went so far as to obtain a search warrant and raid the candidate’s office tower, hauling out boxes of documents and computers in front of television cameras.

The F.B.I.’s job is to investigate, not to influence the outcome of an election.

Such acts could also be prohibited under the Hatch Act, which bars the use of an official position to influence an election. That is why the F.B.I. presumably would keep those aspects of an investigation confidential until after the election.

Violations of the Hatch Act and of government ethics rules on misuse of official positions are not permissible in any circumstances, including in the case of an executive branch official acting under pressure from politically motivated members of Congress. Such violations are of even greater concern when the agency is the F.B.I.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/o...ils-did-the-fbi-director-abuse-his-power.html

When you beat the drum over Commey's statement, it just proves there is nothing down for people like you turbo, rather than your preferred candidate wins because of their policies, Trumps wins based on the level of mud racking of the opposition, continue to live in your dumb-ass world turbo, you ain't no genius that is for sure.

 

lol
Sorry, not a lie.
I went in as E2 and not E1 because I maxed the ASVAB test before I went in. I outscored everyone in the battalion including the CSM who was the battalion commander. So I had the choice of any job that I wanted..
I was constantly "courted" for Officer's school since that's where the smart people are pushed towards while the others are better suited for "non leadership" type positions - turned it down. Left Basic as E4 walked right into being a squad leader (was only 7 people) and still bothered to go to OTS but turned it down. (Had no plans of doing that for "life")
See ? it's not that hard to believe. But I know your comment was just to get me to reply, which I did. (claps)
Then instead of saying I'm some hypocrite for not serving - you can say I'm some war-monger - but I didn't stay in long enough for that - so you can call me some other name I suppose. lol.
But regardless - sit back and enjoy the show. President Trump is going to be great - perhaps greater than anyone has imagined. He's already explained his first 100 days in office - and compared to what our current leader has (not) done in 8 years - it will be impressive.

 

One of the myths my liberal friends like to perpetuate this election cycle is that Trump supporters are uneducated. LOL! It is a given with them. I would just like to point out to them that the most uneducated people in this country are the welfare class. And they are certainly not on the Trump Bandwagon. Nosiree! They are firmly in Hillary's camp. Much to risky to vote for Trump when they know that Hillary will keep those welfare checks and food stamps coming.

 

Are you ready for phase three of Wikileaks? It just might be that the FBI knew what was coming and just needed a last ditch effort to CYA. It all makes you wonder what really went on with Janet Reno when she covered up everything for Billy Boy the first time. What is it with the Justice Department? They kiboshed the investigation into Clinton Inc. What information does the Clinton Crime Family have on these people? Is there an unwritten law that protects Clintons, no matter what they do?

 

It's really going to be a bombshell if classified emails were going to Anthony "can't keep his dick in his pants" Weiner. I never understood why women like Huma would take up with a slimeball like that. Just one look at him and you can tell he is a weasel.

 

Rush Limbaugh will be a must-listen-to today. You folks in other countries can stream him to hear this one. He comes on at 12 noon Eastern time. That should be 5 or 6 PM Zulu time for those familiar with Greenwich Mean Time.

 

You can bet it was not baking cookies recipes.

 

This is what makes a lot of sense:

 

I mentioned this elsewhere, but Bill Maher explained that the average Trump rally attendee makes 72K, which makes them likely college degreed.

Just to be clear, I have no problem with people having enough to eat regardless of their work status. If I were king, I'd make everyone eat healthy food and not smoke, however.

 

redietz, watch the Peter Thiel, a homo sexual, video I just linked to above. I mentioned his sexual preference because like all libTards that show off their tolerance while referencing people, I to wanted to appear intelligent too. You know, symbolism over substance and all that influential stuff that impresses libTards.

 

I have actually watched a portion, maybe 10 minutes, of the Thiel speech previously. If I remember correctly, one of Thiel's points is the nature of the trade deficit and how theory isn't working out practically. What people need to accept is that if we change the nature of how/why we buy goods, paying US workers for goods produced here, we have to come to terms with buying less stuff. Buying less stuff sends shivers through people who have grown up paying next to nothing for electronics and entertainment. But that's kind of required to shift to a more US-internal economy.

As I said, I consider myself left of Marx, but the way "liberal" has morphed through the decades means one is supposed to be on board with open borders and internationalization of trade and interventionist foreign policies. My "foreign policy" is straight out of Pat Buchanan's old speeches, and I think closed borders and buying less stuff makes sense. Now the counter-argument is usually that I'm living in the 50's or something. But I don't see why a socialist needs to be on board with overwhelming illegal immigration, trade similarly without borders, and massive military intervention and expenditures.

 

Clever trying to keep people from watching this. Your sophistry may be based on something Thiel said once, and who knows when. This speech was today, is fresh, and does not go into trade deficit. Try watching the whole thing. It indicates why Trump is effective with those of us tired of DC cronyism.

 

I watched this today, bozo. Previously means previously today, smart guy. He goes into trade at the eight or 10 minute mark. You might want to take notes next time. He actually references, in this clip, how economic theory says the international agreements should work, but in practice millions of jobs have been lost. Then he goes into how financiers benefit from the changeovers in the American workplace. He does indeed mention the trade deficit, specifically, at about the 10 minute mark.

I agreed with what he was saying, so I didn't watch the whole thing.

You are truly a maroon. I suggest next time you post a clip, you take notes on the thing.

 

Gizmo, if you don't know what's said in a clip you posted, I can only imagine what fiction you insert in your roulette accounting. There's no disgrace in taking notes.

 

The way things are going about this speech, this thing is everywhere. It's totally viral, everybody is talking about it.

 

I think, for a day at least, some people can put the "liberal media bias" stuff to bed. The speech got excellent coverage. USA Today, which has exposed many of Trump's business shenanigans, did a feature on the speech.

 

I think that they know what the real polls say. It's time for some in the media to CYA.