Roulette Reading Randomness

Ok how the hell ya gonna know ahead of time when the streak/opportunity gonna pop at roulettes, dice or baccarats? Are you sure that you and the evenbob-spike ain't the same cat, hey hey??????????????????????????????

 

Are you suggesting that I can micro manage my 6 groups made up of 12 individual sets? That might be interesting. So you have a stream of 1's & 2's and you know how to identify configurations that are like 12 sets and 6 groups? How?

 

That is what I was going to teach you. Spike would never teach you. But I would have made you prove it all to yourself in front of everyone and including them doing it too. You won't have the skill until you actually display the ability to do it. But I was surprised just how fast this mountain face looks like pure death to you guys. But I'm still here waiting for the chicken shit parade to pass by. You want to know what Spike would never have the guts to teach in an open forum?

Your question is how will you know when a streak is going to pop up? The short answer is that you will never know when. But I can assure you that you don't need to know when. Randomness does things that are generally regular. You will learn to play off of that. Turbo tried to suggest that randomness has a common characteristic. It does. I can teach you to see this common occurrence type of consistency. But if all you want is a magic wand and a guarantee then seek the advice of those that preach their kind of gambling. I can teach the most common types of streaks from the most common types of characteristics. You can use those things everywhere, not just Roulette.

 

Here. This is a fake mountain and a fake mountain climber, a grand standing French Politician. The cameraman tilted the camera for the pose.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/french-politician-accused-of-staging-glacier-summit-photo



Just look at those two people below and to the right standing around like this is some kind of weenie roast. And nobody would climb this face with just one ice ax.

 

Why do some cats go round and round with the talking in riddle, circular illogic and the ever present non-stop hints droppings? What's it all about then Alfie, hey hey?????????????????????????

 

I'm not suggesting anything that engages me in mind-numbing debate. I'd rather watch paint dry.

 

That's Spike's thing.

If you ask questions about randomness and want to understanding how to use it then this will take a while. I took a full week at two hours per lesson per day to just open the eyes before I could show how to continue teaching. Stop him-hawing and pull the trigger. I must teach people to see the characteristics first before they can learn how to use what they can clearly see once they have reached that step. That is the logical process. It won't be circular illogical if you apply yourself.

 

Then watch paint dry.

 

I presume I hit a nerve . LOL.


ND

 

Here: This can be any EC chart.

Code:

|    X | -- 1
|    X | -- 2
| X    | -- 3
|    X | -- 4
|------| -- 5
| X    | -- 6
|    X | -- 7
|    X | -- 8
| X    | -- 9
|    X | -- 10
| X    | -- 11
|    X | -- 12
| X    | -- 13
| X    | -- 14
|    X | -- 15
| X    | -- 16
| X    | -- 17
|    X | -- 18
| X    | -- 19
|    X | -- 20
| X    | -- 21
| X    | -- 22
| X    | -- 23
| X    | -- 24
|    X | -- 25
| X    | -- 26
| X    | -- 27
|------| -- 28

The right side hits as a single hit while the left side has all kinds of different type streaks. The big picture is that the right side is consistently single. You can see this characteristic or you can't. First you must see many types of characteristics before you want to know how to use them while never being able to predict them or how long they will last. That comes later. I really don't want to talk to myself. There are several primary characteristics to learn before moving on to using them. These are the more common ones to learn first. The singles on the right start at line 10.

 

at line 10 if you just bet on the left side to win then your strategy would be to go right back to it after each right side loss. You would win 7 times or +7 in the aggregate.

But if you just went after one win on the left side after each right side single then you would get 7 without any losses. I just wonder how many of you geniuses out there can tell a reason for seeing the second way without losses as being the better strategy?

 

So John Patrick suggests a 2, 1, 2, 3 progression. I think that requiring 4 wins in a row to complete the "Up & Pull" sequence is to difficult. Those of us that actually play know that getting two in a row is much easier and far more common. So I'm suggesting ( 1, 2 ) times 3. In other words you fight for first win positions, where you have turned 1 into 2. At that point you search for the best opportunity to get that second win that takes 2 and makes it 4. With that 4 you pull off and wait for the next bet possibility based on any trend that is still continuing. That new bet is once again at 1 times your base value. You just keep plugging along fighting for new +1's. You always use the house's money to go further. 1 becomes 2 and 2 becomes 4. If you apply that to the 7 net wins without losses then you get way more than playing into losses with parlayed money. The 1 / 2 parlay is micro sized and can be targeted in steps if needed.

win 1 becomes 2
win 2 becomes 4 -- take 3 and hold it

win 1 becomes 2
win 2 becomes 4 -- take 3 more and hold that too

win 1 becomes 2
win 2 becomes 4 -- take 3 more and hold that too

now for the seventh and final win of the characteristic:

You win the seventh decision but lose the eighth so you end up with nothing from that.

But you just netted 9 from your seven in a row. You protected winnings all along the attempts too.

The secret is in learning how to fight to get to +1. It takes skill and determination to get to +1 and to stay there or better for a long time. Most people don't know how to even do that much. You really don't read much online about staying at +1 or better for a long time. People just don't know the value of that capacity.

 

Here is a nice stretch. It is an example of the near total absence of singles. At around event 30 you get just two singles. This is nearly 40 events with only two singles. This stuff happens if you are looking for it. It only takes your imagination to figure out what to do if you see this characteristic.

Code:

| X    | -- 7
| X    | -- 8
| X    | -- 9
| X    | -- 10
| X    | -- 11
| X    | -- 12
| X    | -- 13
| X    | -- 14
| X    | -- 15
| X    | -- 16
| X    | -- 17
|    X | -- 18
|    X | -- 19
|    X | -- 20
| X    | -- 21
| X    | -- 22
| X    | -- 23
|    X | -- 24
|    X | -- 25
|    X | -- 26
|    X | -- 27
|    X | -- 28
|    X | -- 29
| X    | -- 30
|    X | -- 31
| X    | -- 32
| X    | -- 33
|    X | -- 34
|    X | -- 35
| X    | -- 36
| X    | -- 37
| X    | -- 38
|    X | -- 39
|    X | -- 40
|    X | -- 41
|    X | -- 42
|    X | -- 43
| X    | -- 44
| X    | -- 45
| X    | -- 46

 

how did you learn so very much about games casino play?

 

I started by trying to see if I could guess what the hottest 3 numbers were in 300 spins of Roulette more than 25 years ago. I cut my teeth on numbers that hit at least 9 times in 300 spins. That was the break even point. Randomness never cooperates like you would like it to. You would make a huge mistake thinking that anything you are searching for will be performing at it's very best just because you walked into the door. You had better actually be prepared for the worst. You should always have a plan for the worst. Just ask others around here that have decades of playing experience. There are a lot of lessons to learn along the way of gaining real playing experience. You must learn how your life goes when everything blows up in your face and you lose your entire bankroll. If this was easy there would not be casinos.

 

With knowledge every casino trip would win total for sure. Correct?

 

No. It will never happen that way. Here is the process. You learn the skill of seeing characteristics in two preferred states. The very best state of a characteristic is the perfect continuing form. The next best is the almost perfect continuing form that is 90% pure but is still a long lasting continuation.

Next you must have a plan. You must devise the safest way to bet a characteristic with the least number of losses. So you learn the skill of best tactic to exploit the situation.

In all this there is one thing that will occur that you can't avoid. You must know what it means to take a first try attempt, the first bet, when going after an active trend characteristic. Because you are betting Even Chance bets you get one win and one loss and you have balance. So the thing that kills your session off is a swarm of first try, first bet, losses. It happens too. You can see all the great chances to bet on a perfect repeating trend characteristic and you will have a day when all your first bets lose.

So knowing when a perfect continuation comes to an end is useful information. The first loss of a perfect win streak is in fact the end. That's it. Don't be married to it. It's over. The event is over, move on.

If you learn how to play trends the smart way then you will take notice of your session wins to losses ratio. I always want to know what my won sessions amount is running in with relation to my losses. So if I can win 5 sessions at 3 net wins per session for each lost session at 7 net losses per lost session then I have a ratio. It takes 2.33 won session to balance a 7 net loss session. If my win to loss ratio is 4.66 wins to each lost session at 7 net losses then that ratio is 2 to 1.

In the game of coin flips, Even Chance games, the ratio statistical in the long run is 1 to 1.

So my conclusion is that you will have losses but you can also win the war even though you might lose a few battles.

So knowing how much is enough actually matters. If I place $90 bets and get all three net wins then I have $270 per session win. I play to win all sessions. I do this because I can avoid the swarms of first bet losses. I'm willing to stay all day if I have to. I just know how to get the three net wins and go. If you take $270 off the casinos 20 days per month then you will take in $5,400 per month. You need at least 3 full session bankrolls of $630, ( 7 x $90 ) X 3 = $1,890, or rounded up to $2,000.

All this is knowable and provable before you ever go into a casino to try it. You can practice on your own using real live spins, real live cards, or real live dice over the internet, all for free. All it takes is the work to learn characteristics and trend recognition, the ability to learn strategy that fits the trend that is continuing at the time, and the self control to only take what you know is such a minimal amount that achieving it should almost come naturally by variance alone. So having knowledge of what just plain dumb luck alone can produce is good to know too. It's experience that wins the day. Not making dumb mistakes is of very high value knowledge. There is only one way to get that and that is by making a lot of mistakes in the first place.

 

Complete, f#$%ing horseshit!!!

 

mr. gizmotron member is offered so much super information. question. are you a professional gambler and rich? can you please honest answer for me?

 

Okay so you don't have a gas oven, is there a bridge or a busy free-way nearby, so you don't have to suffer like this everyday? It must be murder for you living the life you live.