Roulette Reading Randomness

So its jumped back to Low, I'd take a chance on low hitting again

 

I get this. You are playing along in the home audience.

 

Like you said chopping; the low Did win. So in for the 3rd net win

Yes, actual #'s, nice too try against

 

The low won, so like you say take the win.
You hit the spins to quick. But it's good to see if could win.
I'll just watch the rest of the video.
Nice work Gizmo

 

Did you see the 4th video? I fixed that link too. It illustrates variance.

I transformed it from Private to Public.

 

2:34 L/H following; but with 3 wins should be gone.
Not yet

 

Even with a glitch in part of the primes, it is good to see.
I kept getting taken to looking at L/H

Thanks for posting

 

The Blind variance video, great, yeah Turbo, let's not go there.
Yeah tracking and making a decision when to bet, not to hard too do.
Just have to keep calm and not chase.
I'll keep looking for more videos.
Great work.

 

This glitch thing has it losing on 29 and 30 for it not being a "Not Prime." In the math and total it is correct. It just charts it in the graph as a "not Prime." So to be clear. 29 and 30 are from the Prime set of the group. I'll have to look then and see if the win and the total are charted correctly. This was all caused when I added single zero as a feature. I had to abandon the last version because the software was corrupted by a new version of the free open source developer software. I had to restore my entire computer to save years of work. I lost the last bug free version. Oh well. So this version is stuck without the source anymore. I don't want to build this again just for that charting difference.

 

While searching for a back up copy of the charting software I came across a new upgraded version that has one noticeable bug fix. It leaves " no bet" in the chart. Otherwise it functions correctly and includes the correction for 29 and 30.

Code:

----------------------------------------- 
 W | B  R | O  E | L  H | F | 0 | P | S |  --  SN  --  SP 
   |    X | X    | X    | 7 |   |   |   |  --  01  --  07 ( $ -90 ) Zero's/
 X | X    |    X | X    | 2 | X | X |   |  --  02  --  02 ( $ 0 ) Zero's/
   |    X | X    | X    | 7 |   |   |   |  --  03  --  07 ( $ -90 ) Zero's/
   | X    |    X | X    | 6 |   | X |   |  --  04  --  06 ( $ -180 ) Zero's/
   |    X | X    |    X | 1 |   |   | X |  --  05  --  21 ( $ -270 ) Zero's/
 X | X    |    X | X    | 0 | X |   | X |  --  06  --  10 ( $ -180 ) Zero's/
 X | X    | X    |    X | 9 | X |   |   |  --  07  --  29 ( $ -90 ) Zero's/
 X |--------------------| 0 | X | X | X |  --  08  --  37 ( $ 40 ) Zero's/Odd/
 X |    X | X    | X    | 9 | X |   |   |  --  09  --  09 ( $ 170 ) Zero's/Odd/
   |    X |    X | X    | 6 |   |   |   |  --  10  --  16 ( $ 120 ) Zero's/Odd/
   | X    | X    |    X | 1 |   | X | X |  --  11  --  31 ( $ 95 ) Red/Odd/Low/
   | X    | X    | X    | 7 |   | X |   |  --  12  --  17 ( $ 15 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
   |    X | X    |    X | 5 | X |   | X |  --  13  --  25 ( $ -65 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
   | X    | X    |    X | 5 | X |   | X |  --  14  --  35 ( $ -145 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
 X | X    |    X |    X | 0 |   |   | X |  --  15  --  20 ( $ -45 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
   | X    |    X |    X | 8 | X | X |   |  --  16  --  28 ( $ -125 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
   | X    | X    | X    | 7 |   | X |   |  --  17  --  17 ( $ -205 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
   |    X | X    | X    | 1 | X | X |   |  --  18  --  01 ( $ -285 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
   |    X |    X | X    | 2 |   | X | X |  --  19  --  12 ( $ -365 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
 X |    X | X    |    X | 9 |   |   |   |  --  20  --  19 ( $ -265 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
   | X    | X    |    X | 5 | X |   | X |  --  21  --  35 ( $ -345 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
 X |    X | X    |    X | 9 |   |   |   |  --  22  --  19 ( $ -245 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
 X | X    | X    |    X | 9 | X |   |   |  --  23  --  29 ( $ -145 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
   | X    |    X |    X | 2 |   |   | X |  --  24  --  22 ( $ -225 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
   | X    |    X | X    | 2 | X | X |   |  --  25  --  02 ( $ -305 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
   | X    | X    | X    | 5 |   |   | X |  --  26  --  15 ( $ -385 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
 X | X    | X    | X    | 3 | X |   | X |  --  27  --  13 ( $ -285 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
   | X    | X    |    X | 1 |   | X | X |  --  28  --  31 ( $ -365 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
 X | X    | X    |    X | 9 | X |   |   |  --  29  --  29 ( $ -265 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
 X |    X | X    |    X | 3 | X |   | X |  --  30  --  23 ( $ -165 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
 X |    X | X    |    X | 3 | X |   | X |  --  31  --  23 ( $ -65 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
 X |    X | X    | X    | 3 |   | X |   |  --  32  --  03 ( $ 35 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
 X | X    |    X |    X | 6 | X |   |   |  --  33  --  26 ( $ 135 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
 X | X    |    X | X    | 0 | X |   | X |  --  34  --  10 ( $ 235 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's, 
   | X    |    X | X    | 2 | X | X |   |  --  35  --  02 ( $ 155 ) Finale:0,3,6,9's,

This new version has bet options for the Finales, included is combo bet telemetry too. All I did to post this correctly was to use NotePad on Windows 10 to strip out the " no bets" and replace it with empty space, " ". Otherwise this is better software and includes a bet grouping that anyone can almost instantly see in the charts. The source code is gone forever.



I could put this up too. This would turn the place into Finales addicts.

 

Yesterday it was pointed out to me that two of my videos were set to private mode. There are five videos so far. They are all set to public view now. I had to remove one and publish it with a new YouTube link. That one was video 5.

I think I will play a round of get-seven-net-wins with the new Finale app as the next video. Getting a 50% increase on your bankroll is pretty aggressive.

 

This is how I intend to validate Reading Randomness:

I will teach anyone that wants to learn it how to go into a casino and intentionally and almost consistently win. When they do lose they will not clean out their full bankrolls. They will only lose that session's bankroll. Typically, after about a month of two hour per day practicing, a knowledgeable player will reach a mathematically impossible capability of 2 to 1 or better, where 1 to 1 is the basic odds of coin flip based chance driven games.

So my goal is to validate by peer review my research. You people in the gambling community are my peers. This is the process of applying the practical use of it before the mathematical equations are known before hand. I've done enough personal and private research with others. This is the next step.

I don't care what disbelievers say or think. I have been dealing with that for more than 14 years now. All I care about is making sure that people that invest themselves are actually given a real chance to exploit what has always been the truth about randomness and guessing. Everyone on earth says this guy are that guy is a genius for discovering something that has always been the truth. It's just being first. That's all it is.

So I will work on another public video where I try to beat the Finale bet selection process. I need to lose a few well fought sessions where I don't just give in to blind variance selection where variance goes up and down naturally, most of the times. I need students here to learn what natural moving averages of variance looks and acts like. That's just betting on one side regardless of strong or weak side awareness. In typical chaos, variance goes up and down symmetrically. You can often get 1 net win off of this blind symmetry. You can surly see if you go into free-fall.

 

Bullshit you will. You, or any of these other systems fools here, couldn't win your way out a paper bag!

 

I can punch your lights out both physically and mentally. And I actually would prefer the former. Are you skilled in military combat trained martial arts? There's a difference you know.

Would you bet your life on this? You are nothing but a windbag without substance.

I have already opened many people's eyes to seeing the biggest picture of the strong side and the weak side singles pattern. It is very common. You don't have to wait all day for just this one common occurring characteristic. And that duplicates six times with my six grouping charts. You can see a strong enough sequence of coincidences that you can get your three net wins and done in less than three hours typically.

You do know that in counting cards the players strategically wait for the mathematical advantage to happen. Then they increase the bets. All I do is read coincidences that are also in the condition of working effectively and increase the bets. In other words I wait for favorable conditions.

But you don't believe that randomness offers favorable conditions so you act like an asshole that knows what reality is. Big deal jerk you are. You are irrelevant to this conversation. We don't need saving so that you can present yourself as superior. I heard what you said, what you always say. You are in fact the scammer. You want people to respect your intellect. Only there is no there there.

 

Ignore the embittered loser, he lost his shirt and then some in a casino a long time back, to thick to learn, he will die a bitter miserable fool.

 

Ha! That's the same as already being dead.

 

thanking you for the honest post jbs. these 2 or 3 are engaged in the Bored Day Syndrome along with fixed income or no income, in my opinion.

 

He may well as be...

 

And now we have SEXDealer pimping himself as another intellect. Another dork to put on the do not spindle or mutilate list.

 

you belong on a big board like Wizzard of Vegas, you has beens are all the same which is broke and full of how to beat the casinos.