Casino So you wanna be a gambler!

Hello - I don't play casino games for a living and just play for fun.
Now there are so many wannabes and punters to wish they could win with no success.
And we have punters who claim ridiculous things like constant winnings without showing how.

This is very poor and no way out.

The difference with sport betting forums is that someone can show a placed bet before the game has happened and you can see the result and see if the bet won or lost.
That way you can understand and see with your own eyes if a punter is winning or not winning long term.

The reason is that they show everything with a spreadsheet and get an indication of return on investment ROI this prove if they can predict better then 50% ratio and would indicate positive expectation after 1000 placed bets or more.

This is why I buy a sport trading package and start to search for values in different games to play and trade.
I do this with great success.

The point is that with Roulette, no matter Advantage play or systems you can never prove your claims.
That is why I regard everything as crap.
Same goes for Craps, Sic Bo, Baccarat and any other casino game.

This was my introduction to show my common sense as a gambler and that you will take me seriously when I say that I believe I find a winning method for both EC and Inside Numbers playing Roulette among other casino games.

Now I will meet every reader halfway.
I will upload videos to show how to win, but I will not explain how you do it.

Problem is that someone could claim that I only show recorded winning session without showing the losing ones.
And the only thing you can rely on is my reputation.
I am known by many during the past ten years.

Cheers

 

Ok, I will explain the setup - I will risk 20 Euro and play EC with La Partage Rule - and try to double the money t0 40 Euro.
If I accomplish that I will try to turn 40 Euro to 80 Euro.
Then I considered that proof of a very decent method that can triple the bank.

After that, I will do the same setup for the inside numbers.
Playing six and four numbers among others.

And the last final method will be a hybrid of Pierre Basieux EC bet for the inside numbers splitting the wheel - number ring - into a binomial placement where you cover 9 versus 9 numbers on opposite sides.

That is a total of three methods.
And remember I do this for the fun part, not proving any grail or similar, just some decent methods that can make you win overall with great success.
Because tipple a bankroll with or without progression is not easily done.
And the methods are based upon probability and math calculations upon the STDV values.

Cheers

 

I admire you for trying to figure out a way to prove your capability. You are so right that just claiming does almost nothing. I have decided that proof is the end result needed. So I'm telling all, answering all, and teaching all in order turn people into my proof. I did this because of something Johno, JK, said that convinced me that I could teach reading randomness with very little consequences to gambling still be an opportunity. It's really fun to teach. People ask questions and you don't need to drop hints are be cryptic with the answers.

Anyway good luck with this.

 

Seeing I got a name check in this thread from Mark

The main system I am consistently winning win was posted on betselection, it received over 4000 views, I am in touch with a few members behind the scenes, haven't received any negativity regarding it. One member advised me that it was too valuable to post, another told me, it is the best thing he has ever seen. Somebody (8Ror or something) questioned my winning, so I posted my A4 paper score cards, which showed everything, including the balance. I've no need or desire to make it public once again, those that caught it, are the fortunate ones, that doesn't mean you can give anybody a winning methodology and they will win with it.

It requires a lot of work, once you have it sussed, it will be worth it.

Me too

Good luck and all the best
John

 

Hello John and Gizmo ...
Thanks for your kind comments.

I will make short videos and only aim for +4 units each session.
With 1000 Euro bank and 10 Euro units size, we talk 40 Euro a day income.

I will upload the videos when I have done several of them.
The strategy is to aim for +4 units each day, but some days you have to struggle to achieve a win target, then I decide to break even and take a break, wish I personal also regard as a won session as there was no loss.

Don't know how many session I can make each day - as this is a fun side project and don't want it to interfere with my daily sports trading.
But I estimate 4 to 12 units each or every second day and I reckon around 100 to 150 units each month.
This means if I am correct that it will take at least eight weeks to double the bank.

Cheers

 

I apologies for not making videos, take to much time to record and upload and post and explain.
Made a spreadsheet and will post screenshots.

Spreadsheet
https://1drv.ms/x/s!AtKN4lBrJStLwEOxJKDpvhLjOQHt?e=ENXgl1



upload

 

I will explain this to John and ask if he wants to make a test and post-verdict ...

Cheers

 

Sorry P

I don't play Roulette and have no interest in the game.

Good Luck with it.

John(o)

 

Ok but it works on baccarat, craps, sic bo, roulette - send you message - cheers

 

Well, then there is only one left that I trust @ND
If he is around and PM I will send him the approach.
albalaha have try to solve this with no succes ....




If not then i will just close this topic and move on - have a great day - cheers

 

@ND, you can't be serious? haha

If it has merit, then albalaha would probably hawk it, he's quite negative when it comes to systems

I suggest send it to Jimski. Eugene or Roulette Ghost

JBs would be desperate for it

 

Well fine with me and I don't need to rush things as it has been proven to make 30K by another person.
Not my twist of it, but a similar method that I considered less accurate and my believe is that I improve it.
I put 76 pages of information into one message.
Anyone who wants the original I can send it or upload it - but my version keeps private.
The threshold is not the MM is the selection process.

Cheers

 

This is ridiculous - I will do this with sport and 1.65 odds - have you read the expression that all selections are the same - nonsense.
Here is the proof.

Let's say you aim to win two in a row and are depended on two or three strikes to succeed.
There exist various ways to find such a sequence.

Now look at this - six singles and one series of three is 2.5 STDV and less if the series hit before six singles.
That is one static window of events and based upon the law of series and math and probability calculation.
Where singles and has the value of 1 and larger series has the value of 1 and higher depending on length.

Now next window of events.
There are as many singles as there is series, so six singles versus three series are the same as above.
Same values and same match and probability calculations, same statistics.

Now, look at the bet within the bet.
Assume I bet to win twice during six events based upon singles versus series.

Then If I win my first bet getting a series I stop and wait for a change of color.
That way I play FTL and hitting series when they strike.

But look now what happens if I lose my first bet.
If I don't win two in the row catching a series of three or higher, then first hitting series is a series of two.
Now can you see the expectation and likelihood in the future outcomes?
Your future expectation is to get at least one more series no matter length.
Can be a single series no matter length or two or three after each other.
If not you have a 2.5 STDV window.

True True False True True False True True

Suck it in and have a nice day - the bet within the bet - copyright SPUTNIK 2019

 

I don't like the roulette also, I like the Russian roulette.