Las Vegas GF Chat Room

Early on, Eliot disagreed with my timeline that the casino would cut off a winning player as quickly as I said they would. he shared his experience of being called in to evaluate an even bigger player than we were talking about.

If you ask him again about the Mdawg situation, now 16 months into a claim of winning nearly every day and being comped a suite for basically 16 months, I believe he will have a different answer.

And while Eliots original disagreement was about the timeline (he believes the casino would be VERY careful), when asked specifically about Mdawgs claims, how did Eliot respond? That is the point he went to the trouble to post a power point explanation of baccarat scammers. If you don't understand his answer, you really are dumb as dogshit!

 

I'm relaxing at the main residence, basking in the knowledge that I won in Vegas again, and UNKewlJ is yapping like the nervous poodle that he is, to no end other than crying over that someone else won when he could not.

 

Insults aside, you probably still have his attention on VCT.

So ask him if a player can win consistently over a period of 3 years, to the tune of 7 figures, and still get comped by the casino that they won.

He can reference his knowledge of that big player, did that player get comped while he was winning or not?

 

Yes, that is the largest part of it.

Another part, one often overlooked, is a claimant's insistence on repeating a claim, especially in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary.

It causes people's minds to short circuit, for lack of a better term; case in point is Trump and his "stolen election" nonsense.

 

Neither of you got this correct. It comes down to WHAT others want to believe, Who made the claim, and do you like the claimant or not

In Trump's case, his "election nonsense" is only nonsense to confused and biased liberals, potheads, and weirdos. 2000 Mules clearly and scientifically explains whom, why and how.

In kew's case, he's a simple, jealous no-life elf who scours the internet forums daily looking for suckers and anyone else who'll believe he wins along with patiently putting up with his pathologically lying and other BS.

In maxpen's very sad case, the legend in his own mind tells him that he's the penultimate "LV Answer Man" who prides himself on "running his own show". But when somebody like me comes along and actually schools him on how to REALLY run their own show (put down the DU play for years, after which max privaletly BEGGED me to help him find an infected machine) and as I did in scoring my recent $1.5million VP win that I needed neither max nor his team mates to get it done....these things irk the big shot no end.

And MrV--the one who tries so hard to stir pots and cover up the personal problems he's facing. Nuff said.

Basically, people only want to believe that which doesn't make them uncomfortable. Others who win big? Well, if you're a winner then you'll never have a need to obsess over creating reasons why someone else "really didn't win big". Otherwise, well, there's been plenty of THAT to study here and on VCT lately.

Most importantly, we arrived home late last night, and we'll be heading up to Tahoe/Reno via a day or two in LV, and then up to the Oregon Coast (so sorry you can't afford to make the dinner V) and then onto Washington and Idaho. Anything to stay away from the heat. Unfortunately for the moron squad that's stuck in LV year-round---NOBODY CARES!!!

 

Rob, I am unaware of these pesky "personal problems" you claim I have, you know, the ones you say I "stir pots" to cover up.

Wow, you're so incredibly insightful about the personal issues of strangers whom you've never met and about whom you actually know next to nothing, but you claim you're da man so I guess I'd best reexamine my life and get my priorities in order, like you have.

First up on the agenda, first item on the Singer playbook is "fooling the sheeple."

Got it.

One question: MUST I lie continuously, or can I throw in a dose of reality now and then, for flavor if nothing else?

Thanks, O gamblin' guru, you da man!

 

Rob is right about one thing. It matters who makes the claims.

I try to give everyone the benefit of doubt, especially people with a history of being credible or even a lower standard, a history of not being not-credible.

But when it is someone like Rob who has been proven not credible and flat out BS time and time again, there is no reason to believe a word he says. He can try to prove his latest fantastical claim, but has never been able to.

 

"Never been able to prove his claims" is really way too much of an understatement. He has been caught numerous times fabricating evidence.

 

Talking about yourself?
https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/percentage-count.22962/page-11#post-149168

https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/percentage-count.22962/page-11#post-149172

https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/kewlj.21712/page-27#post-131311

https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/s...bles&p=134159&highlight=lied+mdawg#post134159

https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/showthread.php?7018-The-anti-Singer&p=147618&viewfull=1#post147618
etc. etc.

 

KJ, his game is a form of juggling.

He makes ridiculous claims then gets his kicks by seeing how long he can keep them bouncing in the air, being talked about, never quite losing steam and falling into oblivion.

It's all about attention, whether he recognizes it or not.

Were people to ignore him and not discuss his myriad brags then he'd slither off into his RV, clean his guns and wait for the Second Coming so Trump can finally MAGA.

 

Mdawg, not one of those links you posts provides any proof that I have lied about anything. They are people with a different opinion than me.

I am talking about claims made, in Singers case, things like that he owned a Newell RV, and this latest of hitting a 1.5 million dollar jackpot. These were proven beyond any doubt. A lawyer should understand the distinction. The manager at the RV dealership stated that the RV that Singer posed in was not his, it was for sale at the dealership and Singer got access by pretending to be a prospective customer. With the 1.5 million dollar jackpot, the money is fake, prop money purchased at Amazon, and the picture of the machine with the jackpot is obviously not a real VP machine in a casino. There is a reflection of stored exercise equipment because the picture came from somebody's basement.

Now you also have been proven to have lied, when for 7 months you claimed winnings almost everyday for a total of $500k and then in one single line said "additionally Wizard and I went over my records for this trip and I am about even".

These thing are proof of one lying about their claims. There is no proof like this or of any kind that I have ever lied about any of my claims, like that I live in Vegas, play blackjack for a living, make what I have claimed to make. Not a single evidence of proof against any of it and for good reason, because all my claims are true. You are confusing people that chose to not believe me, just based on their hate towards me and zero evidence like you and someone like Coach belly frequently say I am lying with no proof. You can say I am lying, but you can't offer any proof, because I am not.

Now have I lied or misrepresented things not related to my claims? A couple times. The most prominent was the fake death thing which I did in an effort to protect myself after being robbed. I also have occasionally not told a real experience in real time, sometimes allowing some time to past so it will be less identifying. I think everyone understand this from a person making a living at the casinos. That is quite a bit different than climbing into an RV at the dealership and posting pictures claiming it is yours, or having to retract $500,000 worth of claimed wins.

So if you have some real proof, that I have lied about any of my claims or experiences that I have shared, show it. Otherwise, you and Singer and coach belly are just haters saying "I don't believe him, he is lying" BUT with absolutely zero proof.

The things said about me, sugardaddy's and male prostitute, I think Singer or someone said I worked at one of the burger places, In & Out or Smashburger, I forget which, are just so ridiculous. Tell me you honestly believe any of these things so I can update you from troll to idiot.

 

Every one of those posts are examples of where you fabricated evidence. But then, a habitual liar is not going to admit that he lies.

Mission146 on the UNKewl one: I'll just assume everything that he says from this point forward is a lie and that's good enough for me.

monet on the UNKewl one: Nothing you post is 100% true.
From faking your own death to using multiple sockpuppets.
Like Coach said... you are constantly lying to the forums and you have admitted to it time and time again.

CoachBelly on the UNKewl one: You're an admitted and proven liar, and a known instigator.
Nothing you post should be believed.

Ozzy on the UNKewl one: With all that the UNKOOL1 has said over the last few days, most likely covering his behind, I have come out with 5 possible categories for him 1- Fraud( like Chrissy Mitchell without financial gain) 2- Weasel( like his buddy Rusty) 3- Liar 4-UNKOOL(given) or last but not least 5- ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Mission146 on the UNKewl one: I'm just going to assume that everything you say vis-a-vis your personal life, both previously and ongoing, is probably a lie.

 

This is the part I like about forums. Every site has a forum doofus, only kew has that title at every one he posts at.

He tells so many lies about himself and anyone who doesn't believe his BS about himself--which, by the way, is EVERYBODY!--that he spends hours and massive amounts of time showing how frustrated he gets with everyone by posting long poorly written rambles trying desperately to get anyone and everyone to believe in his nonsense.

Case in point: Eliot Jacobson immediately recognized kew as a fool and a liar. So what does kew do? After initially trying to coerce EJ into seeing things the same way kew does in his warped, short-circuited world, when EJ pegs the little elf kew starts fighting with him in the same manner he does everyone else!

Oh. What. Fun.

 

Frankly, anybody who bought into the 2000 Mules film has a problem with evaluating evidence. The movie features speculative junk that even a hard-core Trumpite should toss in the circular disposal. Despite people pushing the "success" of the 2000 Mules film in terms of number who watched it, it really has no credibility.

I love dry heat. I'm fine through 108, basically. Now don't get me wrong, I'd prefer 300 perfect days a year in California, but I have no problem with 108-degree days. Of course, I'm a spry soon-to-be-65, so maybe advanced age has degraded Mr. Singer.

That whole spiel of Singer's, that winners don't bother debunking others' claims of winning, is just bullshit. Lifetime winners are best positioned to debunk the claims of others and have a responsibility to do so. Experts reporting what is or is not likely is a responsibility. Life would be easier without doing it, but it needs to be done.

 

I always say the cat what make the claim need to stand the scrutinies. So challenge a cat to prove his style and if he can then he'll shut the yap of the doubter and nays-sayer. I can prove my claim but the bulls-shittter, longs-talker and talls-tale mongers can't, hey hey.

 

You might want to read what Eliot wrote only 2 days ago, something to the effect that he had followed my career and believes everything I have claimed.

And while he didn't say so, it is probably because he knows people that know me.

Anyway, what is funny is how you conveniently ignore that.

 

Do any cats actually think that that illegitimate dementia-ridden piece of shit Biden actually won the election on the ups and up? Can cat really be that dense and retarded, hey hey???????????????

 

I don't care about Biden or politics so please don't go there with me. But as for the above statement, I disagree. No one "needs" to prove anything. These are gambling forums and people can claim whatever they want, including that the machines talk to them (Singer). However, if you are claiming things that defy math and math is a big part of this equation for me, AND you expect people to believe your math defying claims, while you are not required to prove anything, you probably will need to if you want to convince anyone.

I will give a couple examples. Card counting and Video poker machines with a payback greater than 100%. Anyone claiming Longterm winning (and that is what we are talking about) in which the amounts they claim are in the ball park for the amount of play on a game returning 101% like both of these do, need not explain anything. The math works. Now there may be legitimate question related to getting the amount of play down, like for a card counter and I have always been willing to share as much of how I go about that as I possible can (sometimes too much) without harming myself.

Contrast that with Singer, who for years claimed to have won over a million dollars over 10 years, later shortened to $375k over 4 years playing -Ev video poker (he specifically said less than 100 payback) and specifically said he didn't even use a card to get that little extra from mailers, so less than 100% return. He claims he is able to overcome the negative expectation, with progressive wagering (something that can NOT over come negative expectation) and special less optimal plays and machines telling him when they are hot or cold. Um yeah, I am afraid something like that needs proof, although I have never requested it. Frankly there is no proof that would satisfy me on these things. But Singer knows others wouldn't believe him on his word, so several times now he has tried to show proof, but each time it is clearly proven his proof is fake, as occurred with the RV and fake money from amazon in the picture of his safe.

I also never asked for proof from Mdawg. He attempted to show proof by posting pictures of his suite and chips and money, but none of that proves he has won what he claimed. It might prove he is a wealthy guy born into a wealthy family, but I never questioned that. What I question is all the winning he claims at -EV bacarat play with no explanation of how he overcomes negative expectation, other than some weird statements about "betting into streaks". That is voodoo nonsense, like a horse players telling you to pick the hot horse or jockey. But what did disprove his claims was when he admitted he lied about 7 months worth of winning (over $500) and retracted that "to about even".

Now there is a second type of claim made on these forum which is a little more difficult. That is a single shortterm jackpot type win, rather than longterm win. Something like Singer's recent claim. That kind of claim doesn't defy math like longterm claims do. So it is just about credibility of the person making the claim. And well, a guy who climbed into an Rv on the dealership floor and posted pictures claiming it was his RV, simply has no credibility.

 

I'd have voted for a house plant over Trump.

Biden is lame, no question, but at least he isn't a dangerous narcissistic back-stabbing bullshit artist like Trump.

 

I gotta say that the Portland Oregon is an emphatic case in point as to why there are no longer any peaceful, non-violent. political means by which America's problems can be solved, hey hey.
This Has To Be Some Kind Of Joke! - YouTube