Las Vegas GF Chat Room

Was this "guy" your 2nd cousin, who also moonlighted as a busboy in a restaurant operated by your friend's mother-in-law?

 

As i said the singer claims are very improbable but possible. Personally, I think that the singer is a bulls-shits artist just the biden-spike, the limey and gizmo etc. And honest, I never eye-ball the m-dawg posting on the wizard forum, but I know that it is possible to win well and regular at the baccarats on a stricts bets flat basis. And the m-dawg is correct when he say that casinos will comp winning baccarats player well, and for a long time based strictly on theoretical loss, only, hey hey.

 

I am not going to speculate on what I might say, if he claimed this or that. I would need to read his claims and would most likely have some follow up questions.

 

Geez, what's with you? Are you this miserable all the time?

Also, I'm sure you meant can't.

All I know is that there are consistent baccarat winners on this forum as small as they may be.

Maybe you should read their posts and learn? It won't hurt to try. I tried it and it's working for me so far; although it's been only like 2 to 3 months doing what I learned on this board.

Lastly, I was composing a response to KewlJ when I saw your post, so I had to interrupt to make this post.

I would have PM'd KewlJ if I could so I don't waste other people's time but I haven't posted 300 yet so I cannot PM.

Unless you have something positive to offer, can I please ask you not to chime in into our conversation? Thanks.

 

Redietz washed out of journalism.

 

Well I suggest you read Mdawgs "great adventure" so you have all the information before you decide if you believe him or not.

If you do read, you will see that last year (2021) he had a stretch of 102 winning days out of 104 (I think those were the numbers), which if you added up all the numbers had him well over 700K ahead. Then all of the sudden he makes a one line post that read "additionally Wizard and I went over my records for this trip and I am about even". $700k disappeared with that one line. So somewhere he was lying, exaggerating, leaving out the part about the losses or something!

 

For a while I thought that maybe the m-dawg had something going on the side. beyond the generous rfb comp waht allow him to profit. I thought he might have found a way to game the losses-rebates as that is a legit form of advantage play. Arnold Snyder and the Eliot Jacobson have gone into detail about how a shrewd cat can make serious cake just via the losses-rebates, hey hey.

 

The Brokeback Boys of Gambling Forums! KJocchio, the ditz, Homo Ozzy, wittle beachie, petey mcdickinhisass!

Throwing gay orgies near you! Specializing in anal sex. KJ performs fellatio on the other members. ditz likes it up the poop shoot. homo ozzy likes it in his mouth. wittle beachie and petey are the bitches.

 

Another UNKewl post of hypocrisy, at its best! The UNkewl one does little other than stick his nose into everyone else's business. He's never described an actual hand of blackjack that he has supposedly played, but he will write ten thousand word volumes on his opinion of what others are doing, or not doing! UNKewlJ has doxxed the person he thinks is MDawg, and claims that he had casino execs hand deliver (on Halloween ) to his rathole apartment, reams of documents about MDawg's casino play at one casino. Yes, this is definitely a guy who minds his own business.

And SoxFan, the day you take the UNKewl one's word for what someone else said, or has done, will be a sad day for you!

monet on the UNKewl one:
You are too serious.
You lie too much.
You don't get the jokes.
You are the Joke!

mickeycrimm on the UNKewl one: We have a fraudster thats been calling others fraudsters for quite awhile. WTF?

monet on the UNKewl one: Nothing you post is 100% true.
From faking your own death to using multiple sockpuppets.
Like Coach said... you are constantly lying to the forums and you have admitted to it time and time again.

Mission146 on the UNKewl one: I'll just assume everything that he says from this point forward is a lie and that's good enough for me.

accountinquestion on the UNKewl one: You on the other hand are not that believable

 

Yes, several of us thought something like that at the beginning. Shades Don Johnson in Atlantic City. That is why numerous members asked questions, which he did not answer. But eventually loss rebates were ruled out because the guy never reported losses. He claims he won every day. With loss rebates you need to lose some for that advantage play to kick in. LOL.

If you go to the trouble to read Mdawgs LONG adventure and the two years worth of posts, you will see that every possibility has been ruled out. It is full of contradictions, changing stories and statements like "he wins by betting into hot streaks". That is simply voodoo nonsense. That is like a player saying "I bet more when I am going to win", with no explanation of how he knows when he is going to win.

Now with card counting (blackjack) a player does bet more when there is a slightly better chance of winning. But it is the counting of cards and knowing the remaining cards hold a slight advantage that makes that possible. No hunches or feelings (or machines telepathing hot and cold cycles). If a player can't explain HOW he is playing to an advantage, and only has long disproven voodoo concepts, he should expect to be challenged. And if he has discovered some holy grail of baccarat play, something no other player, nor mathematician, in hundred years, using high speed computer simulations has been able to discover, he really shouldn't be posting about it.

 

They probably ran him out when he refused to be objective.

 

Mdawg likes to quote other people, because he can't think for himself. I can quote other people too. And there is a list of about 20 more from earlier in the "great adventure". Remember that list 20 some people that you began attacking because they all had something negative to say? I am not going to go back and post each and every comment.....but I could.

Axelwolf to Mdog: Your post indicate a significant lack of knowledge when it comes to actual Advantage Play. DarkOz is absolutely correct when it comes to opportunities where -Tables can (Not all of them) generate significant amounts of +EV free play For both new members and old members.

Dark Oz to Mdog: All you have proven to date is you are a high roller welcome by Casinos.
Which claims point to you being a habitual loser that the casinos welcome back.

lilredrooster to Mdog: This thread is a really long story about a man who is very deeply in love with himself.

Mdawg, this is about one thing. You have claims that are fantastical and defy the math. Real players and AP's questioned/challenged those claims, and instead of answering those legitimate questions and challenged, you began attacking people, ala Rob Singer.

Real players and people that know and live by the math, have every right to say, "No that is not how it works".

 

The Wizard forced him to lie about being even, to placate hostile members, in exchange for his thread to be unhidden.

You seem to be the only one who never understood that.

 

What's this...tewlj playing the long con? He recently promised that he would try using socks again.

Anyway...Singer's post was directed at tewlj, not you, you Lousy Gambler.

It's bad form for you to ask Rob not to direct comments to another member, in a free-for-all thread like this.

How about you stay in your lane?

 

You are an idiot!! You really are.

Wizard made the mistake of stating exactly what he thought of Mdawgs play before he was forced to retract it, I guess from threat of legal action because he had signed a NDA.

So simple solution: Mdawg should release wizard from the non disclosure agreement and allow Mike to say what he thinks. If by some miraculous chance Mdawg has discovered some way to win, that no other players, nor math experts using high speed computers have been able to discover, Wizard would still respect that and not reveal what it is. But he would be able to say, "Mdawg is doing something I have never seen or heard about before that gives him an advantage".

Just imagine the credibility Mdawg would then have. But everyone knows that is not what Wizard would say, because Wizard already posted what he really thought. It wasn't up long as he had to retract it, but it was crystal clear.

 

Even further proof that you are an idiot. In checking his profile, lousy Gambler has been a member for 18 months, posting mainly about baccarat.

I guess it is your intent to drive away yet another new member, with your trolling and attacks.

 

I don't know what you are talking about, what did the Wizard retract?

But what does that have to do with MDawg making a required statement in order to get his thread unhidden?

 

That's what I meant by the long con.

You have been obsessed with MDawg for way more than 18 months.

 

I am not obsessed with Mdog. I know exactly what he is. He is a rich dude, that likes to gamble, can afford to game, higher stakes and gets comped for his long-term losing (-EV) play. I will give him that he plays the comp game well, and probably gets more comps that he should for his action. And if the comps he received are worth it to him, for the money he loses, power to him. There is nothing wrong with that.

It is this persona of the greatest player ever, with casino personnel rooting for him and patting him on the back telling him he is the greatest ever as they over comp him that I object to. That is just not reality. That is some strange "adventure of" Mdog, twilight zone, alternative reality.

I object to two different people who's claims defy the math and reality.

Have I challenged mickeycrimm's claims of years of winning? Axelwolf's? Maxpen's, Monet? JBS?, JbJb? or any of a dozen people that post regularly who's claims are backed by math and not some "I bet into streaks" or "stop limits" BS?

Answer: No.

It is about the math for me. That is the very low bar that must be cleared.

 

LOL...OK.