Las Vegas GF Chat Room

Denial. The 2nd biggest fault of a liar.

 

You are such a fucking liar! I challenge you to prove this by listing the "booklets" or posting the quotes from whatever forum. You can't and you won't because it wasn't.

Prior to my bringing the topic up at VCT shortly after I arrived, it had been discussed at one other forum, also by me. That is when I discovered there was another long-time player that played AC the same time as me that also tracked two tables and that we both even used the mirrored ceilings at the Old Sands AC to see cards on the other side of the pit, which isn't nearly as difficult as it sounds if you are looking at pips and paint.

You won't find any other discussion in any book or booklet (whatever that means) or any forum. AND that is precisely why you non blackjack players at VCT, you and Alan and a few others gave me such a hard time, because it was something you had never heard of and simply couldn't not comprehend.

So show proof of this yet another false claim, or shut the fuck up, you lying old pig of a man.

Have you just fucking given up now Rob? You are proven wrong almost every single day now.

 

My my kew---you do get a bit unnerved whenever another one of your lies gets exposed! Maybe your good pal redietz could try and rescue you again with one or two of his million dollar words that never really do fit.

Your problem kew is how obvious it is whenever you try to stay relevant. You've run out of lies so you repeat them and you appear foolish in the process. And they're just not getting the needed attention anymore either. I'd say people are tired of you by now, wouldn't you? I mean, there's only so much of your BS they'll put up with, right?

So enuf with trying to push the two-table nonsense. That ship sailed long ago when Alan made a fool out of the cowering you. Rather, let's hear more of what it's like being the Monkey Poxfather.

That outta be interesting

 

By the way MP, we're heading out for another week of travel today if we can get around the flash flooding. I typically don't post during these times because, well, unlike you, my real life is not lived here. So you're free to concoct anything you can come up with, for now, to get the attention you crave.

You can even fake your own death again as an escape in case you just can't take it anymore ...like the last time

 

You don't see me posting anywhere what exactly I have in the bank, real estate, stocks or bitcoin but many have speculated as to what that amount is. Obviously I must be consistently LIQUID in the multi million range MINIMUM just to get the casino credit lines I get.

But that's not the point (what I have).

THE POINT HERE, is that this drug addict is more lost than I thought if he thinks that a mere one million net worth would allow him to play anywhere near the level at which I play! Really, again, I don't want to make this low self esteem drug addict feel any lower, but there are African Americans in Compton, California, who have thousand square feet shacks they inherited free and clear that give them a net worth greater than this lost soul's. I recall Pothead V saying something about how he could scrape together to show a total of a half M in the bank to R.Singer, well that would mean that his home is barely worth a few hundred K, leaving him maybe a couple hundred K in stocks, or maybe more likely he meant that if he liquidated all his stocks he'd be able to show a half M in cash, which would raise his home's value to the half M neighborhood (still very weak).

Anyway, the point is not what anyone has or doesn't have, but that this druggie would tout a million net worth after working a lifetime as meaning something in terms of being able to play at the MDawg level in Vegas, shows a complete disconnect with reality.

I think he should have worked harder at doing drugs, not that it matters, but this guy is really lost.

 

MDawg plays private reserved tables.

MrV smokes another one and posts more Land of the Lost thoughts.

He couldn't even read a simple article correctly, thought it meant that there was going to be a pot smoking friendly casino in Vegas!

 

This is just bullshit. Rob has made 2 completely false statements in the last 18 hours, not opinion type statements, but black and white statements that he should be required to prove upon being challenged. And I have challenged him to provide prove of his statements providing names and quotes, which he can't, so he won't.

Instead, this liar and coward gives us a "I will be on the road and unable to post" as he so frequently does when caught in a lie. At VCT, he just left the forum altogether after being caught, not once but twice.

Rob should wear that compulsive liar banner, until he proves these blatant lies.

 

You've made so many statements, assertions and allegations, that you have steadfastly refused to prove when challenged.

Singer should be required to prove his statements, but you are not subject to the same requirement?

Is that how you think the forums should work?

 

Singer just makes stuff up and declares it.

What I took away from the two table discussion was the obvious perspective that all counts are partial counts. That's so blessedly obvious, it's such a critical fulcrum around which everything spins, and yet I had never stated it that way.

I did the eyeball testing both in casinos and at home after measuring distances in casinos, and I suggest anyone on the fence just do the same. Go into a casino, plop down at an empty blackjack table in various seats, whip out a tape measure and measure distances to card locations on adjacent tables, then go home and duplicate the distances and see if you can discern the cards individually or as pips and paint. That doesn't mean you can do it in a live setting, but it provides the minimum proof of the possibility of doing it.

 

Every count IS a partial count. Once casinos stopped dealing the single deck game down to the last card and implemented multiple decks with a percentage cut off, every count used became a partial count. But that doesn't matter, you aren't attempting to identify what every remaining card is. You are trying to identify if the remaining cards are "rich" or depleted in aces and 10 value cards and partial counts adequately do that. AND that is precisely why "wonging in" (seeing limited cards) works (as proven by Stanford Wong).

But I don't want to get into all the math of it again. If Rob makes a statement that my knowledge of this is from books, "booklets" and discussions on forums from years ago, and I say there was never any discussion in any book or forum and challenge him to prove his false claim, he should be required to.

Smelly Belly, this isn't opinion. This isn't some claim of "I won this or that". This is a claim of hard evidence, where Rob says this information was all discussed in books. It wasn't and upon challenge he should be required to prove me wrong or shut up.

 

The fact that UNKewlJ discussed in the past "Wonging out" and "tracking two tables at the same time" repeatedly without a single mention of the overlying issue of what casinos even allow mid shoe entry is where he falls flat and it became clear to a lot of people a long time ago that he's just presenting theoretical play he read about somewhere.

accountinquestion on the UNKewl one: Literally, your story is something anyone who cares enough could figure out via books and reading the internet. While I find your stuff interesting to read, you've never said anything interesting except for some story you told me in private. I believed it but now I wonder if I wasn't just fed bullshit. At the time I thought you were a legitimate person and have taken things from that convo as true. I now believe this was a mistake.

accountinquestion on the UNKewl one: You on the other hand are not that believable

accountinquestion nails down how questionable UNKewlJ is: I actually thought you had credibility. I now regret repeating that story to others where I come across as "I have it on good authority" with what is likely a at best 50/50 story.

accountinquestion on how UNKewlJ must be a phony: All I know is if kewl was who he claims he would have packed up some time ago

 

Axelwolf to Mdog: Your post indicate a significant lack of knowledge when it comes to actual Advantage Play. DarkOz is absolutely correct when it comes to opportunities where -Tables can (Not all of them) generate significant amounts of +EV free play For both new members and old members.

Dark Oz to Mdog: All you have proven to date is you are a high roller welcome by Casinos.
Which claims point to you being a habitual loser that the casinos welcome back.

lilredrooster to Mdog: This thread is a really long story about a man who is very deeply in love with himself.

 

I deal in reality. I'm actually at the casinos playing, winning.

You go on with your stuff you read about in books , and most everyone by now understands that you're not a genuine player anyway. Even newcomers like SeedValue sniff you out instantly.

UNKewlJ played a bit here and there, ended up in the red, and gave up long ago, apparently! He belongs in the same category as PotheadV with his thinking that a million net worth means anything in terms of being able to play at MDawg's private reserved tables, level. These guys demonstrate a complete disconnect with reality - obviously, because they spend most all their time talking about casino play instead of actually playing.

 

You've made many claims where you've said that you had certain information in writing, but always refused to provide any evidence.

So then you put up or shut up...why aren't you subject to the same requirements as Singer?

 

You should know, right, Rob?

You're the one "denying" that the posts of others such as myself and KJ are true, and you have zero knowledge of the facts upon which to base such a claim; stated differently, much like your beloved butt plug you're pulling it out of your ass.

I tell you what: I'll give you three days to objectively prove the truth of your post, the one where you affirmatively claimed as a matter of fact that I sit around in my "cancer incontinence drawers."

To be clear: you posted that my health is so poor that I must wear and use Depends (or the equivalent brand of adult diaper) as you affirmatively claim that I have uncontrollable BM's due to illness.

This is your moment to shine, Rob: you can grab that brass ring and shout "I am redeemed!"

All you need to do is PROVE your bold claim of diaper necessitated incontinence as referenced above.

You can't, of course, but if by some miracle you could prove it withing three days from now I'll pay you $1.5 Million US dollars.

Heck, you won't even have to phony up a VP pick this time, and you'll actually get paid.

Better get on it, "Mr. Bond:" call in the chits from all your spook buddies; call out all the CIA assets, send them to Portland with listening devices and water boards: I'm sure you know the drill.

Of course, three days from now you'll have nothing but your dick in your hand, which is the same as having nothing.

Get going, sparky, time's a wastin'.

 

Caveman is a sock puppet of someone, having never posted before or after .

Now here is a suggestion concerning accountinquestion. I communicated privately with accountinquestion just this morning about an entirely different subject matter. But he did mention you at the end. I am not going to quote him, but he described you as a 3 letter word beginning with n and ending with t.

So instead of repeatedly quoting him out of context posting things he may have said in the midst of a heated discussion, on a forum he doesn't participate on, why don't you haul your ass over to VCT and we can have a discussion with the man. Oh you won't do that because Dan Druff won't agree to protect you like Shackleford does. That is why you left VCT.

 

I don't know what you are talking about? Information in writing? Are we talking about something someone else said, that it really isn't my place to divulge? No I won't share something like that? Are you talking about publicly available information in some report about Rob, that I agreed to a legally binding contract not to publicly post? No I won't do that. Otherwise explain what you are talking about.

BUT with Rob, none of that applies. He stated the information I shared was available in books and booklets for many years. I challenge him to prove that which he should be able to do with out stepping on anyone's toes or violating any legal binding agreement. Post the damn quotes and/or the book / booklet. He can't do that because it is a lie, so he pulls his run and hide act. Well at least we get a break from his bullshit for a week.

 

[QUOTE="MDawg]THE POINT HERE, is that this drug addict is more lost than I thought if he thinks that a mere one million net worth would allow him to play anywhere near the level at which I play! [/QUOTE]

Of course I could, if I chose to.

Then again I'd play for a little while and then leave.

I can easily afford that, but yeah, stretching high limit gambling for months on end would likely be beyond my means: not that such a notion would interest me.

I am not like you; you're a full blown degenerate gambler who is so addicted to gambling that he stays indefinitely in casinos.

I play for a few hours, then leave.

 

Not something that was said by someone else...you claimed to have seen documents.

You claimed to be divulging information contained within those documents.

But you didn't provide any proof that those documents exist, and that you've seen them.

 

That is part of it MisterV, but only part of it.

The other part is the the utter insecurity and narcissism of this person. Every single thing about this grand "adventure of" is about this person trying to prove he is better than everyone else. The pictures of suites, watches, money, chips, luggage, food, all of it. An Insecure person like I have never seen.

At the end of the day, all that stuff is only on loan to him. At the end of the day, ashes to ashes, dust to dust, he returns to the earth, no better, no different than the rest of us.